You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> on 2007/07/25 17:46:10 UTC
301 almost ready
Hello everyone,
This is a heads up. As you may or may not know, the JSR-301 EG and
Oracle (who is leading the project) has been trying to move the JSR-301
R.I. Development branch to Apache. In particular Apache MyFaces. I am
please to announce that Oracle has gotten all the approvals it needs to
continue moving its current R.I. code to Apache and I hope to have a
patch submitted to MYFACES-1664 by the end of this week or the beginning
of the next. This code will be based off the second public draft of 301
draft which is in the process of being released as we speak. Although
this is a work in progress, it should allow the MyFaces renderkits and
the Apache community to begin portal development based off the new
standard and possibly influence the specification before it's released.
Because of how the JCP works, essentially the development work for the
R.I. can be done by the Apache MyFaces community. When the 301 code is
released, Oracle will need to take the release and publish it as the
official R.I. The JCP prefers that R.I.'s be managed by a company and I
believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of MyFaces
community.
We talked briefly on the dev list about adding this as a sub-package to
the MyFaces 1.2 project and I think that the response has been pretty
good. I'll let you know when I get the patch submitted and we can talk
about how to proceed with making this code available.
Thanks,
Scott
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
jup,
I have something more sitting in my queue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-13
(when it arrives, I will handle this)
-Matthias
On 7/26/07, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is some further information on "Intellectual Property Clearance".
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 7/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can move in
> the
> > > code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code grant.
> >
> > even a software grant has be to discussed on general@incubator as well.
> >
> > > The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that so far
> has
> > > developed the code is structured.
> > >
> > > Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by mostly
> persons
> > > who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does community
> building
> > > have to occurr?
> > >
> > > Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we both are active
> in
> > > the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would guess that
> also
> > > Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community will be able
> to
> > > handle the code easily.
> >
> > Scott is already ASF committer, like you and Stan.
> > Also others here, not committers (yet), have provided feedback
> > regarding JSF + portlet.
> > Form that side, all is fine :)
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > > I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant would be
> ok,
> > > what does everyone else think?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Dennis,
> > > >
> > > > I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said licensing for
> > > > the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to publish it
> under
> > > > the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to work out
> the
> > > > logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with the JCP.
> > > >
> > > > He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he would
> > > > like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at Apache
> > > > and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the TCK. But the
> > > > TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges compliance of
> > > > various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part
> > > > > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I
> > > > > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests
> > > > > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with
> that
> > > > > however.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
> > > > >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As
> > > > >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
> > > > >> specification which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know
> > > > >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
> > > > >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating
> > > > >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the
> > > > >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code
> > > > >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the
> > > > >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both the TCK
> > > > >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Scott
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Dennis Byrne wrote:
> > > > >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of
> > > > >>> MyFaces
> > > > >>> community.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If
> so,
> > > > >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code,
> > > > >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration
> > > > >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >>> Scott
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>> Dennis Byrne
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Cool Matthias, thanks. I'll make sure we have that all filled out by
the time I get the code.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> that would be nice.
> @Software-Grant: Schedule B of CCLA is in Omar's hands (at Oracle),
> the update is simple
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/26/07, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I will post a mail questioning whether this code-grant can come in via
>> IPC or as an incubation project to the incubator list.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On 7/26/07, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Martin,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the link. This is one of those strange cases where the
>> > project "could" be considered a part of MyFaces or it could be
>> > considered a new subproject. I think either way, this definitely
>> has to
>> > go before the incubator PMC.
>> >
>> > I did talk with Michael Freedman (the JSR-301project lead)
>> yesterday and
>> > it's looking like he's going to be handing the code over to me
>> sometime
>> > next week or early the week after as opposed to this week like I
>> > originally thought. Because the code was developed in-house at Oracle
>> > until the Apache community started expressing interest, he's just
>> trying
>> > to get stuff into a state where it could be reasonably handed off
>> and be
>> > able to be supported and enhanced by the community. Still, it looks
>> > like we have some footwork that needs to be done with incubator or
>> > whatnot but I think it would be valuable to start figuring out where
>> > this donation is going to go so that when we do get the code, we
>> can hit
>> > the ground running. What do you guys think? Is this something we can
>> > figure out before the code donation is made or do we need to have the
>> > code donation first?
>> >
>> > Scott
>> >
>> > Martin Marinschek wrote:
>> > > Here is some further information on "Intellectual Property
>> Clearance".
>> > >
>> > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
>> > >
>> > > regards,
>> > >
>> > > Martin
>> > >
>> > > On 7/26/07, *Matthias Wessendorf* <matzew@apache.org
>> > > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how
>> we can
>> > > move in the
>> > > > code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus
>> code
>> > > grant.
>> > >
>> > > even a software grant has be to discussed on
>> general@incubator as
>> > > well.
>> > >
>> > > > The question that we'll need to answer is how the community
>> that
>> > > so far has
>> > > > developed the code is structured.
>> > > >
>> > > > Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by
>> > > mostly persons
>> > > > who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does
>> > > community building
>> > > > have to occurr?
>> > > >
>> > > > Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we
>> both are
>> > > active in
>> > > > the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would
>> guess
>> > > that also
>> > > > Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community
>> will
>> > > be able to
>> > > > handle the code easily.
>> > >
>> > > Scott is already ASF committer, like you and Stan.
>> > > Also others here, not committers (yet), have provided feedback
>> > > regarding JSF + portlet.
>> > > Form that side, all is fine :)
>> > >
>> > > -Matthias
>> > >
>> > > > I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant
>> > > would be ok,
>> > > > what does everyone else think?
>> > > >
>> > > > regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Martin
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com
>> > > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > > > Dennis,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said
>> > > licensing for
>> > > > > the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to
>> > > publish it under
>> > > > > the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to
>> > > work out the
>> > > > > logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with
>> > > the JCP.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked
>> out, he
>> > > would
>> > > > > like to contribute some testing code to the subproject
>> here at
>> > > Apache
>> > > > > and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the
>> > > TCK. But the
>> > > > > TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges
>> > > compliance of
>> > > > > various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Scott
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> > > > > > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be
>> made
>> > > as part
>> > > > > > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this
>> project
>> > > and I
>> > > > > > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then
>> the tests
>> > > > > > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to
>> help
>> > > with that
>> > > > > > however.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Scott
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> > > > > >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced
>> > > using the
>> > > > > >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the
>> > > copyrights. As
>> > > > > >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
>> > > > > >> specification which is developed by the Java Community
>> > > EG. I know
>> > > > > >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and
>> so am I
>> > > > > >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit
>> we'll be
>> > > donating
>> > > > > >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces
>> has
>> > > with the
>> > > > > >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because
>> the
>> > > code
>> > > > > >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the
>> R.I., the
>> > > > > >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence
>> both
>> > > the TCK
>> > > > > >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Scott
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Dennis Byrne wrote:
>> > > > > >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle,
>> but the
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as
>> > > part of
>> > > > > >>> MyFaces
>> > > > > >>> community.
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK
>> > > licensing? If so,
>> > > > > >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to
>> > > the code,
>> > > > > >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous
>> > > integration
>> > > > > >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > > > >>> Scott
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> --
>> > > > > >>> Dennis Byrne
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.irian.at
>> > > >
>> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
>> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
>> > > > Courses in English and German
>> > > >
>> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Matthias Wessendorf
>> > >
>> > > further stuff:
>> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > http://www.irian.at
>> > >
>> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
>> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
>> > > Courses in English and German
>> > >
>> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>
>
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
that would be nice.
@Software-Grant: Schedule B of CCLA is in Omar's hands (at Oracle),
the update is simple
-Matthias
On 7/26/07, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will post a mail questioning whether this code-grant can come in via
> IPC or as an incubation project to the incubator list.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/26/07, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> > Thanks for the link. This is one of those strange cases where the
> > project "could" be considered a part of MyFaces or it could be
> > considered a new subproject. I think either way, this definitely has to
> > go before the incubator PMC.
> >
> > I did talk with Michael Freedman (the JSR-301project lead) yesterday and
> > it's looking like he's going to be handing the code over to me sometime
> > next week or early the week after as opposed to this week like I
> > originally thought. Because the code was developed in-house at Oracle
> > until the Apache community started expressing interest, he's just trying
> > to get stuff into a state where it could be reasonably handed off and be
> > able to be supported and enhanced by the community. Still, it looks
> > like we have some footwork that needs to be done with incubator or
> > whatnot but I think it would be valuable to start figuring out where
> > this donation is going to go so that when we do get the code, we can hit
> > the ground running. What do you guys think? Is this something we can
> > figure out before the code donation is made or do we need to have the
> > code donation first?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > > Here is some further information on "Intellectual Property Clearance".
> > >
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/26/07, *Matthias Wessendorf* <matzew@apache.org
> > > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can
> > > move in the
> > > > code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code
> > > grant.
> > >
> > > even a software grant has be to discussed on general@incubator as
> > > well.
> > >
> > > > The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that
> > > so far has
> > > > developed the code is structured.
> > > >
> > > > Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by
> > > mostly persons
> > > > who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does
> > > community building
> > > > have to occurr?
> > > >
> > > > Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we both are
> > > active in
> > > > the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would guess
> > > that also
> > > > Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community will
> > > be able to
> > > > handle the code easily.
> > >
> > > Scott is already ASF committer, like you and Stan.
> > > Also others here, not committers (yet), have provided feedback
> > > regarding JSF + portlet.
> > > Form that side, all is fine :)
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > > I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant
> > > would be ok,
> > > > what does everyone else think?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com
> > > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > Dennis,
> > > > >
> > > > > I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said
> > > licensing for
> > > > > the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to
> > > publish it under
> > > > > the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to
> > > work out the
> > > > > logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with
> > > the JCP.
> > > > >
> > > > > He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he
> > > would
> > > > > like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at
> > > Apache
> > > > > and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the
> > > TCK. But the
> > > > > TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges
> > > compliance of
> > > > > various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > > > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made
> > > as part
> > > > > > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project
> > > and I
> > > > > > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests
> > > > > > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help
> > > with that
> > > > > > however.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scott
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > > >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced
> > > using the
> > > > > >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the
> > > copyrights. As
> > > > > >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
> > > > > >> specification which is developed by the Java Community
> > > EG. I know
> > > > > >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
> > > > > >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be
> > > donating
> > > > > >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has
> > > with the
> > > > > >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the
> > > code
> > > > > >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the
> > > > > >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both
> > > the TCK
> > > > > >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Scott
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Dennis Byrne wrote:
> > > > > >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as
> > > part of
> > > > > >>> MyFaces
> > > > > >>> community.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK
> > > licensing? If so,
> > > > > >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to
> > > the code,
> > > > > >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous
> > > integration
> > > > > >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>> Scott
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>> Dennis Byrne
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
I will post a mail questioning whether this code-grant can come in via
IPC or as an incubation project to the incubator list.
regards,
Martin
On 7/26/07, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Thanks for the link. This is one of those strange cases where the
> project "could" be considered a part of MyFaces or it could be
> considered a new subproject. I think either way, this definitely has to
> go before the incubator PMC.
>
> I did talk with Michael Freedman (the JSR-301project lead) yesterday and
> it's looking like he's going to be handing the code over to me sometime
> next week or early the week after as opposed to this week like I
> originally thought. Because the code was developed in-house at Oracle
> until the Apache community started expressing interest, he's just trying
> to get stuff into a state where it could be reasonably handed off and be
> able to be supported and enhanced by the community. Still, it looks
> like we have some footwork that needs to be done with incubator or
> whatnot but I think it would be valuable to start figuring out where
> this donation is going to go so that when we do get the code, we can hit
> the ground running. What do you guys think? Is this something we can
> figure out before the code donation is made or do we need to have the
> code donation first?
>
> Scott
>
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > Here is some further information on "Intellectual Property Clearance".
> >
> > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/26/07, *Matthias Wessendorf* <matzew@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > > this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can
> > move in the
> > > code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code
> > grant.
> >
> > even a software grant has be to discussed on general@incubator as
> > well.
> >
> > > The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that
> > so far has
> > > developed the code is structured.
> > >
> > > Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by
> > mostly persons
> > > who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does
> > community building
> > > have to occurr?
> > >
> > > Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we both are
> > active in
> > > the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would guess
> > that also
> > > Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community will
> > be able to
> > > handle the code easily.
> >
> > Scott is already ASF committer, like you and Stan.
> > Also others here, not committers (yet), have provided feedback
> > regarding JSF + portlet.
> > Form that side, all is fine :)
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > > I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant
> > would be ok,
> > > what does everyone else think?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > Dennis,
> > > >
> > > > I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said
> > licensing for
> > > > the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to
> > publish it under
> > > > the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to
> > work out the
> > > > logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with
> > the JCP.
> > > >
> > > > He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he
> > would
> > > > like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at
> > Apache
> > > > and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the
> > TCK. But the
> > > > TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges
> > compliance of
> > > > various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made
> > as part
> > > > > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project
> > and I
> > > > > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests
> > > > > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help
> > with that
> > > > > however.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced
> > using the
> > > > >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the
> > copyrights. As
> > > > >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
> > > > >> specification which is developed by the Java Community
> > EG. I know
> > > > >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
> > > > >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be
> > donating
> > > > >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has
> > with the
> > > > >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the
> > code
> > > > >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the
> > > > >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both
> > the TCK
> > > > >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Scott
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Dennis Byrne wrote:
> > > > >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as
> > part of
> > > > >>> MyFaces
> > > > >>> community.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK
> > licensing? If so,
> > > > >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to
> > the code,
> > > > >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous
> > integration
> > > > >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >>> Scott
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>> Dennis Byrne
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Martin,
Thanks for the link. This is one of those strange cases where the
project "could" be considered a part of MyFaces or it could be
considered a new subproject. I think either way, this definitely has to
go before the incubator PMC.
I did talk with Michael Freedman (the JSR-301project lead) yesterday and
it's looking like he's going to be handing the code over to me sometime
next week or early the week after as opposed to this week like I
originally thought. Because the code was developed in-house at Oracle
until the Apache community started expressing interest, he's just trying
to get stuff into a state where it could be reasonably handed off and be
able to be supported and enhanced by the community. Still, it looks
like we have some footwork that needs to be done with incubator or
whatnot but I think it would be valuable to start figuring out where
this donation is going to go so that when we do get the code, we can hit
the ground running. What do you guys think? Is this something we can
figure out before the code donation is made or do we need to have the
code donation first?
Scott
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> Here is some further information on "Intellectual Property Clearance".
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/26/07, *Matthias Wessendorf* <matzew@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> > this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can
> move in the
> > code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code
> grant.
>
> even a software grant has be to discussed on general@incubator as
> well.
>
> > The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that
> so far has
> > developed the code is structured.
> >
> > Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by
> mostly persons
> > who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does
> community building
> > have to occurr?
> >
> > Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we both are
> active in
> > the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would guess
> that also
> > Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community will
> be able to
> > handle the code easily.
>
> Scott is already ASF committer, like you and Stan.
> Also others here, not committers (yet), have provided feedback
> regarding JSF + portlet.
> Form that side, all is fine :)
>
> -Matthias
>
> > I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant
> would be ok,
> > what does everyone else think?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > Dennis,
> > >
> > > I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said
> licensing for
> > > the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to
> publish it under
> > > the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to
> work out the
> > > logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with
> the JCP.
> > >
> > > He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he
> would
> > > like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at
> Apache
> > > and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the
> TCK. But the
> > > TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges
> compliance of
> > > various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made
> as part
> > > > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project
> and I
> > > > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests
> > > > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help
> with that
> > > > however.
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced
> using the
> > > >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the
> copyrights. As
> > > >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
> > > >> specification which is developed by the Java Community
> EG. I know
> > > >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
> > > >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be
> donating
> > > >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
> > > >>
> > > >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has
> with the
> > > >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the
> code
> > > >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the
> > > >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both
> the TCK
> > > >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
> > > >>
> > > >> Scott
> > > >>
> > > >> Dennis Byrne wrote:
> > > >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
> > > >>>
> > > >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as
> part of
> > > >>> MyFaces
> > > >>> community.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK
> licensing? If so,
> > > >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to
> the code,
> > > >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous
> integration
> > > >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Scott
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Dennis Byrne
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Here is some further information on "Intellectual Property Clearance".
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
regards,
Martin
On 7/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can move in
> the
> > code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code grant.
>
> even a software grant has be to discussed on general@incubator as well.
>
> > The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that so far
> has
> > developed the code is structured.
> >
> > Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by mostly
> persons
> > who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does community
> building
> > have to occurr?
> >
> > Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we both are active
> in
> > the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would guess that
> also
> > Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community will be able
> to
> > handle the code easily.
>
> Scott is already ASF committer, like you and Stan.
> Also others here, not committers (yet), have provided feedback
> regarding JSF + portlet.
> Form that side, all is fine :)
>
> -Matthias
>
> > I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant would be
> ok,
> > what does everyone else think?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dennis,
> > >
> > > I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said licensing for
> > > the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to publish it
> under
> > > the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to work out
> the
> > > logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with the JCP.
> > >
> > > He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he would
> > > like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at Apache
> > > and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the TCK. But the
> > > TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges compliance of
> > > various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part
> > > > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I
> > > > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests
> > > > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with
> that
> > > > however.
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
> > > >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As
> > > >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
> > > >> specification which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know
> > > >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
> > > >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating
> > > >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
> > > >>
> > > >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the
> > > >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code
> > > >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the
> > > >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both the TCK
> > > >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
> > > >>
> > > >> Scott
> > > >>
> > > >> Dennis Byrne wrote:
> > > >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
> > > >>>
> > > >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of
> > > >>> MyFaces
> > > >>> community.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If
> so,
> > > >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code,
> > > >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration
> > > >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Scott
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Dennis Byrne
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
> this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can move in the
> code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code grant.
even a software grant has be to discussed on general@incubator as well.
> The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that so far has
> developed the code is structured.
>
> Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by mostly persons
> who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does community building
> have to occurr?
>
> Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we both are active in
> the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would guess that also
> Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community will be able to
> handle the code easily.
Scott is already ASF committer, like you and Stan.
Also others here, not committers (yet), have provided feedback
regarding JSF + portlet.
Form that side, all is fine :)
-Matthias
> I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant would be ok,
> what does everyone else think?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dennis,
> >
> > I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said licensing for
> > the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to publish it under
> > the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to work out the
> > logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with the JCP.
> >
> > He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he would
> > like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at Apache
> > and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the TCK. But the
> > TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges compliance of
> > various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part
> > > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I
> > > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests
> > > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with that
> > > however.
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
> > >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As
> > >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
> > >> specification which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know
> > >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
> > >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating
> > >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
> > >>
> > >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the
> > >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code
> > >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the
> > >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both the TCK
> > >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
> > >>
> > >> Scott
> > >>
> > >> Dennis Byrne wrote:
> > >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
> > >>>
> > >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of
> > >>> MyFaces
> > >>> community.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so,
> > >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code,
> > >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration
> > >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Scott
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Dennis Byrne
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi guys,
this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can move in the
code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code grant.
The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that so far has
developed the code is structured.
Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by mostly persons
who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does community building
have to occurr?
Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we both are active in
the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would guess that also
Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community will be able to
handle the code easily.
I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant would be ok,
what does everyone else think?
regards,
Martin
On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dennis,
>
> I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said licensing for
> the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to publish it under
> the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to work out the
> logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with the JCP.
>
> He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he would
> like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at Apache
> and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the TCK. But the
> TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges compliance of
> various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
>
> Scott
>
> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part
> > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I
> > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests
> > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with that
> > however.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
> >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As
> >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
> >> specification which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know
> >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
> >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating
> >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
> >>
> >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the
> >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code
> >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the
> >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both the TCK
> >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >> Dennis Byrne wrote:
> >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
> >>>
> >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of
> >>> MyFaces
> >>> community.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so,
> >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code,
> >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration
> >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Scott
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Dennis Byrne
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Dennis,
I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said licensing for
the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to publish it under
the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to work out the
logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with the JCP.
He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he would
like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at Apache
and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the TCK. But the
TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges compliance of
various implementations so we need to play nicely with them.
Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part
> of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I
> have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests
> provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with that
> however.
>
> Scott
>
> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
>> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As
>> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
>> specification which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know
>> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
>> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating
>> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
>>
>> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the
>> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code
>> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the
>> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both the TCK
>> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> Dennis Byrne wrote:
>>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
>>>
>>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of
>>> MyFaces
>>> community.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so,
>>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code,
>>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration
>>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dennis Byrne
>>
>>
>
>
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part of
the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I have
hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests provided by
the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with that however.
Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As
> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the
> specification which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know
> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I
> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating
> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process.
>
> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the
> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code
> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the Apache
> community has a much better chance to influence both the TCK and the
> future of the standard Portlet Bridge.
>
> Scott
>
> Dennis Byrne wrote:
>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
>>
>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of MyFaces
>> community.
>>
>>
>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so,
>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code, and
>> a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration loop
>> right next the unit tests. Thanks
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dennis Byrne
>
>
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As per
agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the specification
which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know Martin is on the
Expert Group representing Apache and so am I (representing Trinidad and
the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating soon). So the TCK can be
influenced though that process.
IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the JSF
TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code developed by
the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the Apache community has
a much better chance to influence both the TCK and the future of the
standard Portlet Bridge.
Scott
Dennis Byrne wrote:
> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
>
> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of MyFaces
> community.
>
>
> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so,
> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code, and
> a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration loop
> right next the unit tests. Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
> --
> Dennis Byrne
Re: 301 almost ready
Posted by Dennis Byrne <de...@apache.org>.
believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of MyFaces
> community.
Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so, what
are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code, and a license
that lets us keep this in the continuous integration loop right next the
unit tests. Thanks
Thanks,
> Scott
>
--
Dennis Byrne