You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org> on 2006/10/17 16:35:48 UTC
[VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
The release candidate is available at
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
(It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the BUILDING.txt file
for the implementation source distribution)
It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
and the implementation is tagged at
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
repository and can be found at ...
the spec artifacts
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
the implementation parent pom artifacts
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
the sdo api implementation artifacts
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
the maven sdo plugin artifacts
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
the sdo tooling artifacts
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in the file at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
With 6+1s (1 non-binding) and no -1s I will take this vote forward to the
IPMC. I propose to deal with the slip I made with the missing Javadoc in
RC5a's sample source distro by taking forward RC5a with the sample source
distro substituted with that from RC5. Since there are no binary artifacts
in the sample source distro this is a risk free and easily verified step.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 17/10/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> The release candidate is available at
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the BUILDING.txtfile for the implementation source distribution)
> It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
>
> the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> and the implementation is tagged at
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
>
> The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> repository and can be found at ...
>
> the spec artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the implementation parent pom artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo api implementation artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the maven sdo plugin artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo tooling artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in the file
> at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
Re: Distros, was: Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
I guess I disagree, I think it is really nice to include at least some
pre-built samples with a binary distribution. You download and install the
thing and there's some sample that you can run that just works out of the
box with no messing about. Lots of projects do this, I think its really
helpful. You get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done it right and from
then on you can base new stuff on the what you know works and when something
stops working go back and see whats different. People deploying something
into a production environment are likely savvy enough to be able to delete
some samples from a distro where as complete newbies may struggle to build
things from src with ant or maven right from the first minute. Also right
now we've probably not so many people deploying this into production ;) When
thats more likely we could have several distro's aimed at different types of
users.
...ant
On 10/18/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2006, at 4:25 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
>
> > I had a combined samples and binary distro in RC2, but the
> > discussion of
> > that candidate (
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg09004.html)
> > resulted in me creating a separate distribution.
> >
> > As to you parent directory suggestion, I think it's a good stylistic
> > proposal. Currently the BUILDING.txt instructions tell you how to
> > overlay
> > the samples on the source distro. Given that I'm on RC5 I'd like
> > to propose
> > that we take this suggestion on board for M3 unless there's enough
> > strength
> > of feeling that I should take the time to restructure this now.
> > What do you
> > think?
>
> I don't think there's a "normal" or standard way to do this - each
> community is allowed to choose how it does these things. There's
> certainly no procedural issue here that warrants correction.
>
> Personally, I prefer separate distributions with clear purpose (e.g. -
> bin, -samples, -javadoc, -src) as it allows me to choose what I
> download/install rather than always getting a kitchen-sick distro
> that quite often includes all sorts of stuff that I am not interested
> in. For example, I do not want samples, javadoc, or test code when
> installing something in a production environment.
>
> I think distributing the samples separately is a really good idea.
> This is especially so when you are doing maintenance releases as the
> same set of samples should work against all "compatible" binary
> releases. The same goes for integration tests (and yes, I'd advocate
> a separate source distro for those). Keeping these separate from the
> binary distros helps prevents regressions in the mainline.
>
> Things are different when you're intending to burn lots of bits shiny
> plastic for people to use as coasters, but even then everything seems
> to have an installer that lets people choose what they want to
> install (showing that users want the flexibility to choose). Thing
> is, we're not doing that - we're internet based with online
> distribution.
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Distros, was: Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
On Oct 18, 2006, at 4:25 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
> I had a combined samples and binary distro in RC2, but the
> discussion of
> that candidate (
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg09004.html)
> resulted in me creating a separate distribution.
>
> As to you parent directory suggestion, I think it's a good stylistic
> proposal. Currently the BUILDING.txt instructions tell you how to
> overlay
> the samples on the source distro. Given that I'm on RC5 I'd like
> to propose
> that we take this suggestion on board for M3 unless there's enough
> strength
> of feeling that I should take the time to restructure this now.
> What do you
> think?
I don't think there's a "normal" or standard way to do this - each
community is allowed to choose how it does these things. There's
certainly no procedural issue here that warrants correction.
Personally, I prefer separate distributions with clear purpose (e.g. -
bin, -samples, -javadoc, -src) as it allows me to choose what I
download/install rather than always getting a kitchen-sick distro
that quite often includes all sorts of stuff that I am not interested
in. For example, I do not want samples, javadoc, or test code when
installing something in a production environment.
I think distributing the samples separately is a really good idea.
This is especially so when you are doing maintenance releases as the
same set of samples should work against all "compatible" binary
releases. The same goes for integration tests (and yes, I'd advocate
a separate source distro for those). Keeping these separate from the
binary distros helps prevents regressions in the mainline.
Things are different when you're intending to burn lots of bits shiny
plastic for people to use as coasters, but even then everything seems
to have an installer that lets people choose what they want to
install (showing that users want the flexibility to choose). Thing
is, we're not doing that - we're internet based with online
distribution.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
Actually, reading Ant's note again and my reply, a minor corection --- I
had a separate samples distribution in RC2, but it had its binary
dependencies included. The result of the discussion following that release
candidate is what we have now.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 18/10/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I had a combined samples and binary distro in RC2, but the discussion of
> that candidate (http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg09004.html
> ) resulted in me creating a separate distribution.
>
> As to you parent directory suggestion, I think it's a good stylistic
> proposal. Currently the BUILDING.txt instructions tell you how to overlay
> the samples on the source distro. Given that I'm on RC5 I'd like to propose
> that we take this suggestion on board for M3 unless there's enough strength
> of feeling that I should take the time to restructure this now. What do you
> think?
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
> On 18/10/06, ant elder < ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I've not been paying as much attention as i should have to the SDO
> > distribution discussions so this is the first i've reviewed so sorry if
> > these questions have been discussed earlier - why is there a separate
> > samples distro? Isn't it more usual to bundle samples with the binary
> > distro? Also, with all the distro's should they all have a common top
> > level
> > folder, tuscany-sdo or some such, so its clear where they go, and also
> > be
> > structured so each distro can be unziped over each other with
> > bin/src/samples all ending up in the right place?
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 10/17/06, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> > > The release candidate is available at
> > > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/ ><
> > > http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> > > (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the
> > BUILDING.txtfile
> > > for the implementation source distribution)
> > > It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
> >
> > >
> > > the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> > >
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > >
> > > and the implementation is tagged at
> > > < http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> > > repository and can be found at ...
> > >
> > > the spec artifacts
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > >
> > > the implementation parent pom artifacts
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > >
> > > the sdo api implementation artifacts
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > >
> > > the maven sdo plugin artifacts
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > >
> > > the sdo tooling artifacts
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > >
> > > The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in the
> > file
> > > at
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
> > >
> > >
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/ >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
I had a combined samples and binary distro in RC2, but the discussion of
that candidate (
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg09004.html)
resulted in me creating a separate distribution.
As to you parent directory suggestion, I think it's a good stylistic
proposal. Currently the BUILDING.txt instructions tell you how to overlay
the samples on the source distro. Given that I'm on RC5 I'd like to propose
that we take this suggestion on board for M3 unless there's enough strength
of feeling that I should take the time to restructure this now. What do you
think?
Regards, Kelvin.
On 18/10/06, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry I've not been paying as much attention as i should have to the SDO
> distribution discussions so this is the first i've reviewed so sorry if
> these questions have been discussed earlier - why is there a separate
> samples distro? Isn't it more usual to bundle samples with the binary
> distro? Also, with all the distro's should they all have a common top
> level
> folder, tuscany-sdo or some such, so its clear where they go, and also be
> structured so each distro can be unziped over each other with
> bin/src/samples all ending up in the right place?
>
> ...ant
>
> On 10/17/06, kelvin goodson < kelvingoodson@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> > The release candidate is available at
> > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/><
> > http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> > (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the
> BUILDING.txtfile
> > for the implementation source distribution)
> > It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
> >
> > the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> >
> > and the implementation is tagged at
> > < http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> >
> >
> > The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> > repository and can be found at ...
> >
> > the spec artifacts
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> >
> > the implementation parent pom artifacts
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> >
> > the sdo api implementation artifacts
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> >
> > the maven sdo plugin artifacts
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> >
> > the sdo tooling artifacts
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> >
> > The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in the
> file
> > at
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
> >
> >
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Sorry I've not been paying as much attention as i should have to the SDO
distribution discussions so this is the first i've reviewed so sorry if
these questions have been discussed earlier - why is there a separate
samples distro? Isn't it more usual to bundle samples with the binary
distro? Also, with all the distro's should they all have a common top level
folder, tuscany-sdo or some such, so its clear where they go, and also be
structured so each distro can be unziped over each other with
bin/src/samples all ending up in the right place?
...ant
On 10/17/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> The release candidate is available at
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/><
> http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the BUILDING.txtfile
> for the implementation source distribution)
> It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
>
> the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> and the implementation is tagged at
> < http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
>
>
> The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> repository and can be found at ...
>
> the spec artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the implementation parent pom artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo api implementation artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the maven sdo plugin artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo tooling artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in the file
> at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
I seem to have inadvertantly disenfranchised myself ;-) here's my +1
On 17/10/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> The release candidate is available at
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the BUILDING.txtfile for the implementation source distribution)
> It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
>
> the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> and the implementation is tagged at
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
>
> The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> repository and can be found at ...
>
> the spec artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the implementation parent pom artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo api implementation artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the maven sdo plugin artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo tooling artifacts
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in the file
> at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
Thanks Kelvin, that cleared up my issue: +1
--
Jeremy
On Oct 19, 2006, at 6:20 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
> My recent note in this thread announcing release RC5a is confusing,
> apologies; it's my mail client. The link in my "sent mail" looks very
> different from how it appears in the incoming mail of colleagues.
> Please
> ensure that when you follow the link you end up at the RC5a
> directory. I
> think this problem has arisen because I cut and pasted from my
> previous emal
> and appended an "a", so I will attempt to include the link here
> once again,
> but as a 1st generation cut and paste.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
>
> On 19/10/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have refreshed this release candidate as
>> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a<http://
>> people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
>> I have added the appropriate licenses to the LICENSE.txt file
>> I have taken the opportunity to remove two spurious documentation
>> files
>> that I had meant to remove before, but these are the only changes
>> between
>> RC5 and RC5a. I have updated and resigned the deployed binary
>> artifacts as
>> listed in the root of this thread. Should I re-initiate this
>> vote, or can
>> it proceed from here?
>>
>> Regards, Kelvin.
>>
>> On 18/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm afraid the LICENSE.txt file in the sdo-impl distribution
>> does not
>> > contain the text of the EPL/CPL for EMF. It is referenced by link
>> > from the NOTICE file but legal best-practice says that the text of
>> > all licenses should be included in the distribution.
>> >
>> > Sorry to do this but -1.
>> > --
>> > Jeremy
>> >
>> > On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:35 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
>> >
>> > > Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
>> > > The release candidate is available at
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://
>> people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
>> > <http://
>> > > people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/ >
>> > > (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the
>> > > BUILDING.txt file
>> > > for the implementation source distribution)
>> > > It was produced from source code at the following tagged
>> locations ...
>> >
>> > >
>> > > the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
>> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/
>> spec/
>> > > sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>> > >
>> > > and the implementation is tagged at
>> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-
>> M2.rat>
>> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/
>> > > 1.0-incubator-M2/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache
>> incubator maven
>> > > repository and can be found at ...
>> > >
>> > > the spec artifacts
>> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/
>> sdo-
>> > > api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
>> > >
>> > > the implementation parent pom artifacts
>> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/
>> apache/
>> > > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>> > >
>> > > the sdo api implementation artifacts
>> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/
>> apache/
>> > > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
>> > >
>> > > the maven sdo plugin artifacts
>> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/
>> apache/
>> > > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
>> > >
>> > > the sdo tooling artifacts
>> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/
>> apache/
>> > > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
>> > >
>> > > The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in
>> > > the file at
>> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
My recent note in this thread announcing release RC5a is confusing,
apologies; it's my mail client. The link in my "sent mail" looks very
different from how it appears in the incoming mail of colleagues. Please
ensure that when you follow the link you end up at the RC5a directory. I
think this problem has arisen because I cut and pasted from my previous emal
and appended an "a", so I will attempt to include the link here once again,
but as a 1st generation cut and paste.
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/
Regards, Kelvin.
On 19/10/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have refreshed this release candidate as
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> I have added the appropriate licenses to the LICENSE.txt file
> I have taken the opportunity to remove two spurious documentation files
> that I had meant to remove before, but these are the only changes between
> RC5 and RC5a. I have updated and resigned the deployed binary artifacts as
> listed in the root of this thread. Should I re-initiate this vote, or can
> it proceed from here?
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
> On 18/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm afraid the LICENSE.txt file in the sdo-impl distribution does not
> > contain the text of the EPL/CPL for EMF. It is referenced by link
> > from the NOTICE file but legal best-practice says that the text of
> > all licenses should be included in the distribution.
> >
> > Sorry to do this but -1.
> > --
> > Jeremy
> >
> > On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:35 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
> >
> > > Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> > > The release candidate is available at
> > > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> > <http://
> > > people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/ >
> > > (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the
> > > BUILDING.txt file
> > > for the implementation source distribution)
> > > It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
> >
> > >
> > > the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/
> > > sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> > >
> > > and the implementation is tagged at
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/
> > > 1.0-incubator-M2/
> > >
> > >
> > > The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> > > repository and can be found at ...
> > >
> > > the spec artifacts
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-
> > > api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
> > >
> > > the implementation parent pom artifacts
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> > > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> > >
> > > the sdo api implementation artifacts
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> > > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
> > >
> > > the maven sdo plugin artifacts
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> > > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
> > >
> > > the sdo tooling artifacts
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> > > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
> > >
> > > The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in
> > > the file at
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
> > >
> > >
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
I have refreshed this release candidate as
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
I have added the appropriate licenses to the LICENSE.txt file
I have taken the opportunity to remove two spurious documentation files that
I had meant to remove before, but these are the only changes between RC5 and
RC5a. I have updated and resigned the deployed binary artifacts as listed
in the root of this thread. Should I re-initiate this vote, or can it
proceed from here?
Regards, Kelvin.
On 18/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I'm afraid the LICENSE.txt file in the sdo-impl distribution does not
> contain the text of the EPL/CPL for EMF. It is referenced by link
> from the NOTICE file but legal best-practice says that the text of
> all licenses should be included in the distribution.
>
> Sorry to do this but -1.
> --
> Jeremy
>
> On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:35 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
>
> > Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> > The release candidate is available at
> > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://
> > people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> > (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the
> > BUILDING.txt file
> > for the implementation source distribution)
> > It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
> >
> > the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/
> > sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > and the implementation is tagged at
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/
> > 1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> >
> > The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> > repository and can be found at ...
> >
> > the spec artifacts
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-
> > api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > the implementation parent pom artifacts
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > the sdo api implementation artifacts
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > the maven sdo plugin artifacts
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > the sdo tooling artifacts
> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> > tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in
> > the file at
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
> >
> >
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
I'm afraid the LICENSE.txt file in the sdo-impl distribution does not
contain the text of the EPL/CPL for EMF. It is referenced by link
from the NOTICE file but legal best-practice says that the text of
all licenses should be included in the distribution.
Sorry to do this but -1.
--
Jeremy
On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:35 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> The release candidate is available at
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://
> people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the
> BUILDING.txt file
> for the implementation source distribution)
> It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
>
> the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/
> sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> and the implementation is tagged at
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/
> 1.0-incubator-M2/
>
>
> The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> repository and can be found at ...
>
> the spec artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-
> api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the implementation parent pom artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo api implementation artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the maven sdo plugin artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo tooling artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
> tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in
> the file at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by Pete Robbins <ro...@googlemail.com>.
+1. Looks good to me
On 23/10/06, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "kelvin goodson" <ke...@apache.org>
> To: "tuscany-dev" <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 7:35 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
>
>
> > Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> > The release candidate is available at
> > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> > (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the BUILDING.txt
> > file
> > for the implementation source distribution)
> > It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
> >
> > the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > and the implementation is tagged at
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> >
> > The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> > repository and can be found at ...
> >
> > the spec artifacts
> >
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > the implementation parent pom artifacts
> >
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > the sdo api implementation artifacts
> >
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > the maven sdo plugin artifacts
> >
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > the sdo tooling artifacts
> >
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
> >
> > The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in the
> file
> > at
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
> >
> >
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Pete
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2
Posted by Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com>.
+1 for me, but I think that you should also throw the sample JavaDoc into
the binary distribution of the final drop.
Frank.
kelvingoodson@gmail.com wrote on 10/17/2006 10:35:48 AM:
> Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2:
> The release candidate is available at
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/<http://people.
> apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
> (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the BUILDING.txt
file
> for the implementation source distribution)
> It was produced from source code at the following tagged locations ...
>
> the SDO 2.0.1 spec source is tagged at
> https://svn.apache.
> org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/spec/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> and the implementation is tagged at
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejboynes/rat/tuscany-M2/buildtools-M2.rat>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.
> 0-incubator-M2/
>
>
> The binary artifacts have been deployed to the apache incubator maven
> repository and can be found at ...
>
> the spec artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/commonj/sdo-
> api-r2.0.1/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the implementation parent pom artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-
> repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo api implementation artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-
> repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-impl/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the maven sdo plugin artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-
> repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-plugin/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> the sdo tooling artifacts
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-
> repository/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/tuscany-sdo-tools/1.0-incubator-M2/
>
> The public key for verifying all these artifacts is contained in the
file at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org