You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Victor Mote <vi...@outfitr.com> on 2002/11/18 19:47:22 UTC

[PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

Keiron Liddle wrote (while committing patch from "Bug" 14606):

> patch committed.
> The changed dtd was not committed, mainly because I had some
> trouble with the
> patch and didn't put it in.
> Should we instead change all dtd declarations for all xml
> documents to keep it
> consistent.

I did not realize until I looked right now that I failed to use the -u
option on my diff. Sorry about that.

Yes, we should change all of the declarations to be consistent. I'll go
ahead & do that en masse instead of piecemeal.

Victor Mote


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

Posted by Victor Mote <vi...@outfitr.com>.
Keiron Liddle wrote:

> I'm not really sure what is the source of the problem.
> A few of the patches had hunks failing and some worked with fuzz
> offsets. One error meesage I got was that it couldn't find the ">"
> character on line 9, so I went to line 9 and found the ">" character, of
> course it was really looking for "> ".

Well, that was probably my bad for not using the universal diff format (I
need to start doing these at 2pm instead of 2am). The behavior I saw a few
minutes ago makes me think that IE may be getting confused by the fact that
these patches are for XML files, and that it is treating them as such
instead of as plain old text files.

> Maybe archiving the patch might work better.

I'll try to remember to do that.

> Anyway there are better ways of solving this problem.

I do not understand.

Victor Mote


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

Posted by Keiron Liddle <ke...@aftexsw.com>.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 18:59, Victor Mote wrote:
> Keiron Liddle wrote:
> 
> > Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with
> > downloading via IE.
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out -- I didn't realize there was a problem. I do
> use IE to upload the attachments through Bugzilla. Do you think that is the
> source of the problem? Also, since I don't see it, I don't know what problem
> you are seeing. Is it best practice to use a different browser?

I'm not really sure what is the source of the problem.
A few of the patches had hunks failing and some worked with fuzz
offsets. One error meesage I got was that it couldn't find the ">"
character on line 9, so I went to line 9 and found the ">" character, of
course it was really looking for "> ".

Maybe archiving the patch might work better.

Anyway there are better ways of solving this problem.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

Posted by Victor Mote <vi...@outfitr.com>.
Keiron Liddle wrote:

> Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with
> downloading via IE.

Thanks for pointing this out -- I didn't realize there was a problem. I do
use IE to upload the attachments through Bugzilla. Do you think that is the
source of the problem? Also, since I don't see it, I don't know what problem
you are seeing. Is it best practice to use a different browser?

Victor Mote


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

Posted by Keiron Liddle <ke...@aftexsw.com>.
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 19:47, Victor Mote wrote:
> I did not realize until I looked right now that I failed to use the -u
> option on my diff. Sorry about that.
> 
> Yes, we should change all of the declarations to be consistent. I'll go
> ahead & do that en masse instead of piecemeal.

Thanks, all done.
Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with
downloading via IE.

Hopefully I got it all correct.

> Victor Mote



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org