You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/12/31 17:26:14 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (POOL-178) Common interfaces and abstract classes for BOP and BKOP

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Phil Steitz closed POOL-178.
----------------------------

> Common interfaces and abstract classes for BOP and BKOP
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: POOL-178
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-178
>             Project: Commons Pool
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
>            Reporter: Gary Gregory
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>         Attachments: POOL-178.diff
>
>
> I have created a patch that IMO should make it easier for us to further refactor code.
> In brief, OP/BOP and KOP/BKOP do not have a common parent interface/class. This patch remedies this by pulling up the close/clear/getNumActive/getNumIdle methods into a new interface and class.
> This seems not very controversial (to me at least), so I would like to commit it (unless riots spread from Paris to this list.)
> Thoughts?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)