You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Dimitri Yioulos <dy...@firstbhph.com> on 2006/11/16 15:29:15 UTC
SA scoring my domain mail
Hi all.
Recently, I upgraded from spamassassin-3.0.4 tp spamassassin-3.1.7. Whereas
previously I had whitelisted my domain so that SA wouldn't score mail coming
from my domain, after the upgrade it is. How can I correct this?
Thanks.
Dimitri
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: SA scoring my domain mail
Posted by Dimitri Yioulos <dy...@firstbhph.com>.
On Thursday 16 November 2006 9:49 am, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:29:15AM -0500, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > Recently, I upgraded from spamassassin-3.0.4 tp spamassassin-3.1.7.
> > Whereas previously I had whitelisted my domain so that SA wouldn't score
> > mail coming from my domain, after the upgrade it is. How can I correct
> > this?
>
> You probably "whitelisted" your domain in whatever you use to call SA. SA
> has no ability to not "score mail" if mail is passed to it.
Thanks, Theo. I guess it's a MailScanner question. Wasn't sure where to ask.
Dimitri
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: RelayChecker too slow?
Posted by Kosmaj <ko...@yahoo.com>.
Thanks for your help!
With relaychecker_reduced_dns set to 1 JSA successfully
processed next 150 messages without a single time-out fialure!
While RC worked and was hit many times.
Kosmaj
--- John Rudd <jr...@ucsc.edu> wrote:
> Kosmaj wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm new to the list. I joined a week ago.
> > I'm using 3.1.7 on Windows through JSpamAssassin and
> > Outlook Express. I'm not using Bayes yet.
> > A few days ago in order to fight stock and gif spam
> > I installed as my first plug-ins ImageInfo and RelayChecker-0.3.
> > I was very happy with RC because in a number of cases it
> > was the only rule capable to detect spam. But then
> > I noticed that I have more undetected spam, without
> > any SA header, with only "+OK nnn octets" signature
> > by JSA. I disabled RC and in last 2 hrs I got SA header in
> > every message. JSA has an internal timeout of 20 sec
> > which I cannot change without rebuilding the whole
> > application. Is there a way to speed up RC?
> > I'm running the default setup with:
> > relaychecker_pass_auth 0
> > relaychecker_reduced_dns 0
>
> try setting that last one to 1.
>
> relaychecker_reduced_dns 1
>
>
> Let me know how that goes.
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link
$200,000 mortgage for $660/ mo -
30/15 yr fixed, reduce debt -
http://yahoo.ratemarketplace.com
Re: RelayChecker too slow?
Posted by John Rudd <jr...@ucsc.edu>.
Kosmaj wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm new to the list. I joined a week ago.
> I'm using 3.1.7 on Windows through JSpamAssassin and
> Outlook Express. I'm not using Bayes yet.
> A few days ago in order to fight stock and gif spam
> I installed as my first plug-ins ImageInfo and RelayChecker-0.3.
> I was very happy with RC because in a number of cases it
> was the only rule capable to detect spam. But then
> I noticed that I have more undetected spam, without
> any SA header, with only "+OK nnn octets" signature
> by JSA. I disabled RC and in last 2 hrs I got SA header in
> every message. JSA has an internal timeout of 20 sec
> which I cannot change without rebuilding the whole
> application. Is there a way to speed up RC?
> I'm running the default setup with:
> relaychecker_pass_auth 0
> relaychecker_reduced_dns 0
try setting that last one to 1.
relaychecker_reduced_dns 1
Let me know how that goes.
RelayChecker too slow?
Posted by Kosmaj <ko...@yahoo.com>.
Hello,
I'm new to the list. I joined a week ago.
I'm using 3.1.7 on Windows through JSpamAssassin and
Outlook Express. I'm not using Bayes yet.
A few days ago in order to fight stock and gif spam
I installed as my first plug-ins ImageInfo and RelayChecker-0.3.
I was very happy with RC because in a number of cases it
was the only rule capable to detect spam. But then
I noticed that I have more undetected spam, without
any SA header, with only "+OK nnn octets" signature
by JSA. I disabled RC and in last 2 hrs I got SA header in
every message. JSA has an internal timeout of 20 sec
which I cannot change without rebuilding the whole
application. Is there a way to speed up RC?
I'm running the default setup with:
relaychecker_pass_auth 0
relaychecker_reduced_dns 0
OTOH, in ImageInfo I changed the rule for DC_GIF_UNO_LARGO
by reducing minimum __GIF_AREA_ from 180k to 40k pixels.
I collected about 10 different spam GIFs and found only
two of them larger than 180k pixels.
Any hints about speeding up RC, or using other rules
(plug-ins) instead will be greatly appreciated.
[I'm not using Razor and DCC since I read that it's
hard to have them running on Windows. BTW, I handle about
400 mails a day, 80% of them are spam.]
Thanks,
Kosmaj
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link
Compare mortgage rates for today.
Get up to 5 free quotes.
Www2.nextag.com
Re: SA scoring my domain mail
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:29:15AM -0500, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Recently, I upgraded from spamassassin-3.0.4 tp spamassassin-3.1.7. Whereas
> previously I had whitelisted my domain so that SA wouldn't score mail coming
> from my domain, after the upgrade it is. How can I correct this?
You probably "whitelisted" your domain in whatever you use to call SA. SA has
no ability to not "score mail" if mail is passed to it.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"I see! So the cockpits are going to be filled with drunks with guns ...
Co-pilot, switch seats with me! I can't get another DUI! and if the
cop gets nosy, plug him!" - Lewis Black, The Daily Show 2002.07.17