Re: Taking notice of community comments

[Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>]

Hi Enis,

.gitignore files have now been added back into SVN area. Apologies for
taking so long to get this reverted.

Committed @ r1227267 in trunk

Thanks

Lewis
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
<le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK so to clarify.
>
> I've removed the extra jar files which were littering the place. I've
> also removed the .gitignore files whereever I saw them. I'll revert
> the .gitignore files for the reasons you mention as they are more than
> justified Enis.
>
> Thanks
>
> Lewis
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Lewis for taking care of this. I agree that we should remove the
>> extra jars, and cleanup the unnecessary files. The only thing is that,
>> since we should continue supporting the git repo, when you check out the
>> code from git://git.apache.org/gora.gitthat we should be able to compile
>> and run the unit tests.
>>
>> We may opt to keep the .gitignore (and similar) files in the repo, but not
>> release them in the tarball, but it is too much of a hassle to maintain
>> this. Besides I think of .gitignore files as a part of the code (since it
>> configures your build structure), so we can release them together with the
>> code in the tarball.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Enis
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Enis,
>>>
>>> No I'm not using Git, but realise that a few of you were/are,
>>> therefore I am more than happy for you to revert the changes I made to
>>> suit those Git repos users.
>>>
>>> If there is anything else I can do then please say and I will help to
>>> make the necessary changes.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I think we should keep the .gitignore files, and revert the commit for
>>> > this. The git/svn flame wars is still very hot in members@, but even if
>>> we
>>> > will not have read/write git access, we will always have at least
>>> read-only
>>> > git access at git.apache.org. Some people (like me) prefer to use git as
>>> > their main tool, and we have a git repo at
>>> > git://git.apache.org/gora.gitthat we should support. Besides, the
>>> > release CAN and SHOULD include the
>>> > .gitignore files for git to work correctly.
>>> >
>>> > Normally, we do not need more than the top level .gitignore, but since
>>> for
>>> > the build to work with ant, we needed those empty dirs at
>>> > (gora-xxx/lib-ext, etc), and since git does not track empty dirs, the
>>> > default way to add them to repo is to add an empty .gitignore. Now that
>>> we
>>> > have switched to maven, we probably do not need some of those dirs, so I
>>> > propose to revert the commit, and selectively do remove the ones not
>>> > needed. One more reason to revert the change is that the patch for issue
>>> > GORA-63 seems to be accidentally committed at
>>> > gora-core/src/main/java/org/apache/gora/compiler/GoraCompiler.java.
>>> >
>>> > Lewis, are you using the git repo. If not, I can do the changes if you
>>> > prefer.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Enis
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>>> > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> You should be able to see this has now been addressed and Committed @
>>> >> revision 1213062 in trunk.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks
>>> >>
>>> >> Lewis
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
>>> >> <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > OK please see below
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Yeah we can remove the .gitnore files, feel free to svn remove them,
>>> +1.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > will do
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I'd like to move away from having any of these files in trunk since
>>> we
>>> >> >> don't
>>> >> >> need them as they are all available on Central right? Let's get rid
>>> of
>>> >> >> them...
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Yeah, we've moved completely away from the cassandra and hector
>>> versions
>>> >> and
>>> >> > now support 1.X, in addition this thrift jar looks pretty our of
>>> place as
>>> >> > I've upgraded the HBase dependency to 0.90.4 (latest stable as well).
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'll look into it and get a Jira logged and patch submitted.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ta
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Cheers,
>>> >> >> Chris
>>> >> >>
>>> >> > Thanks
>>> >> > Lewis
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Lewis
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Lewis
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lewis
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lewis



-- 
Lewis