You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by TJ Kolev <tj...@gmail.com> on 2010/03/26 20:23:29 UTC
Which is the stable release?
Greetings!
Let's say I was recommended Lucene and want to use it. So I go to
http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/. These are the things I find less than
optimal:
- It does not say loud and clear which is the latest stable release.
- The news from 17 Feburary [sic] 2010 imply 2.9.1 is the latest release.
- Scroll down, click link for zipped stable release. Looks like the file is
for release 2.0, dated 11 March 2007 - three years ago.
How about putting a nice clean link/button to the side, near the top of the
page that says "Download the latest 2.9.1 release"?
So in the end how do I download compiled assemblies for 2.9.1? Or is 2.0
from 2007 really the latest stable release? Or may be it is 2.9.2?
Regards,
tjk :)
RE: Which is the stable release?
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
> DIGY - I know you've ported over many of the 2.9.2 changes into the
> trunk - are there any left outstanding?
No, all diff's in Lucene.java 2.9.2 are ported. No waiting issue.
Current state is ready for a realase.
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgarski@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:05 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Which is the stable release?
An official release of 2.9 is overdue and is needed to allow us to move
forward with 3.0.
DIGY - I know you've ported over many of the 2.9.2 changes into the
trunk - are there any left outstanding?
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:hm@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:46 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
Subject: Re: Which is the stable release?
I had the same problem when I started. It seems the tags in the
Subversion
tree are the way to go. I don't mind compiling the source code.
For starters it definitely would be nice to have a version marked as the
latest stable version together with binaries on the web site. I wonder
how
many people give up on Lucene.Net immediately because they can't figure
out
where to start. I almost would have.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 15:23, TJ Kolev <tj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Let's say I was recommended Lucene and want to use it. So I go to
> http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/. These are the things I find less
> than
> optimal:
> - It does not say loud and clear which is the latest stable release.
> - The news from 17 Feburary [sic] 2010 imply 2.9.1 is the latest
release.
> - Scroll down, click link for zipped stable release. Looks like the
file
> is
> for release 2.0, dated 11 March 2007 - three years ago.
>
> How about putting a nice clean link/button to the side, near the top
of the
> page that says "Download the latest 2.9.1 release"?
>
> So in the end how do I download compiled assemblies for 2.9.1? Or is
2.0
> from 2007 really the latest stable release? Or may be it is 2.9.2?
>
> Regards,
> tjk :)
>
--
Hans Merkl
Right On Point, LLC
215 Victor Parkway, Suite E
Annapolis, MD 21403
Phone: (443) 951-4324
E-Mail: hmerkl@rightonpoint.us
RE: Which is the stable release?
Posted by Michael Garski <mg...@myspace-inc.com>.
An official release of 2.9 is overdue and is needed to allow us to move
forward with 3.0.
DIGY - I know you've ported over many of the 2.9.2 changes into the
trunk - are there any left outstanding?
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:hm@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:46 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
Subject: Re: Which is the stable release?
I had the same problem when I started. It seems the tags in the
Subversion
tree are the way to go. I don't mind compiling the source code.
For starters it definitely would be nice to have a version marked as the
latest stable version together with binaries on the web site. I wonder
how
many people give up on Lucene.Net immediately because they can't figure
out
where to start. I almost would have.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 15:23, TJ Kolev <tj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Let's say I was recommended Lucene and want to use it. So I go to
> http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/. These are the things I find less
> than
> optimal:
> - It does not say loud and clear which is the latest stable release.
> - The news from 17 Feburary [sic] 2010 imply 2.9.1 is the latest
release.
> - Scroll down, click link for zipped stable release. Looks like the
file
> is
> for release 2.0, dated 11 March 2007 - three years ago.
>
> How about putting a nice clean link/button to the side, near the top
of the
> page that says "Download the latest 2.9.1 release"?
>
> So in the end how do I download compiled assemblies for 2.9.1? Or is
2.0
> from 2007 really the latest stable release? Or may be it is 2.9.2?
>
> Regards,
> tjk :)
>
--
Hans Merkl
Right On Point, LLC
215 Victor Parkway, Suite E
Annapolis, MD 21403
Phone: (443) 951-4324
E-Mail: hmerkl@rightonpoint.us
Re: Which is the stable release?
Posted by Hans Merkl <hm...@hmerkl.com>.
I had the same problem when I started. It seems the tags in the Subversion
tree are the way to go. I don't mind compiling the source code.
For starters it definitely would be nice to have a version marked as the
latest stable version together with binaries on the web site. I wonder how
many people give up on Lucene.Net immediately because they can't figure out
where to start. I almost would have.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 15:23, TJ Kolev <tj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Let's say I was recommended Lucene and want to use it. So I go to
> http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/. These are the things I find less
> than
> optimal:
> - It does not say loud and clear which is the latest stable release.
> - The news from 17 Feburary [sic] 2010 imply 2.9.1 is the latest release.
> - Scroll down, click link for zipped stable release. Looks like the file
> is
> for release 2.0, dated 11 March 2007 - three years ago.
>
> How about putting a nice clean link/button to the side, near the top of the
> page that says "Download the latest 2.9.1 release"?
>
> So in the end how do I download compiled assemblies for 2.9.1? Or is 2.0
> from 2007 really the latest stable release? Or may be it is 2.9.2?
>
> Regards,
> tjk :)
>
--
Hans Merkl
Right On Point, LLC
215 Victor Parkway, Suite E
Annapolis, MD 21403
Phone: (443) 951-4324
E-Mail: hmerkl@rightonpoint.us