You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/17 16:03:30 UTC
internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0
(third round))
Marcus.
I ran into this on today's master. Did you follow up on this in 4.2?
Or do you have a ticket or wiki page for it?
tahnks
Daan
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. can't figure out how to deploy VPC. In 4.2 it tells me to jump
> through a few extra hoops regarding setting up internal loadbalancer
> service first, "Provider InternalLbVm should be enabled in at least
> one physical network of the zone specified", so I look at my physical
> network -> network service providers and see "Internal LB VM" is
> disabled, so I try to enable it and get "Provider is not ready, cannot
> Enable the provider, please configure the provider first". I'm stuck,
> I don't see anything in the UI that would provide a configuration
> dialog for the internal lb provider, nor do I see anything in the
> global options. It makes me wonder how upgrades will fare if VPCs are
> being used.
Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack
4.2.0 (third round))
Posted by Alena Prokharchyk <Al...@citrix.com>.
I do see the UUID being returned as a part of listNetworkServiceProvidersCmd call ("id" field):
{ "listnetworkserviceprovidersresponse" : { "count":8 ,"networkserviceprovider" : [ {"name":"InternalLbVm","physicalnetworkid":"235cd520-b73c-458b-aa69-14df2f4fe871","state":"Disabled","id":"83011ee3-e498-4a31-8ff0-ba44d3b571c3","servicelist":["Lb"]}, {"name":"VpcVirtualRouter","physicalnetworkid":"235cd520-b73c-458b-aa69-14df2f4fe871","state":"Enabled","id":"8204b150-bb74-4cce-b0f3-3624d978a7f1","servicelist":["Vpn","Dh
Btw, the UI should enable all in-built providers (VR, VPCVR, Internal LB) by default as a part of the zone creation. If UI doesn't do it, its a bug. If you use some API client, you have to make the calls explicitly.
-alena.
From: Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:29 AM
To: dev <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round))
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
<Al...@citrix.com>> wrote:
updateNetworkServiceProvider
ah, so this works even if the uuid is not returned in
listNetworkServiceProvidersCmd?
Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack
4.2.0 (third round))
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
<Al...@citrix.com> wrote:
> updateNetworkServiceProvider
ah, so this works even if the uuid is not returned in
listNetworkServiceProvidersCmd?
Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack
4.2.0 (third round))
Posted by Alena Prokharchyk <Al...@citrix.com>.
Daan, the API is "updateNetworkServiceProvider"
-Alena.
From: Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:17 AM
To: dev <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round))
Thanks Marcus,
this helps, I can now enable it in the interface after configuring it
as enabled. Somehow I still have to enable the InternalLbVm provider
in the physical network after configuring it as enabled and can't find
a api call to do this.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes, it should supposedly never happen under normal circumstances. The
issue I had was because I was using a Marvin zone config that needed
to be updated for the new feature. Added:
{
"broadcastdomainrange": "ZONE",
"name": "InternalLbVm"
}
This should be configured on zone setup as well. To fix it manually, I did:
# list internalloadbalancerelements
# configure internalloadbalancerelement enabled=true id=<the uuid>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Marcus.
I ran into this on today's master. Did you follow up on this in 4.2?
Or do you have a ticket or wiki page for it?
tahnks
Daan
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
2. can't figure out how to deploy VPC. In 4.2 it tells me to jump
through a few extra hoops regarding setting up internal loadbalancer
service first, "Provider InternalLbVm should be enabled in at least
one physical network of the zone specified", so I look at my physical
network -> network service providers and see "Internal LB VM" is
disabled, so I try to enable it and get "Provider is not ready, cannot
Enable the provider, please configure the provider first". I'm stuck,
I don't see anything in the UI that would provide a configuration
dialog for the internal lb provider, nor do I see anything in the
global options. It makes me wonder how upgrades will fare if VPCs are
being used.
Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack
4.2.0 (third round))
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Marcus,
this helps, I can now enable it in the interface after configuring it
as enabled. Somehow I still have to enable the InternalLbVm provider
in the physical network after configuring it as enabled and can't find
a api call to do this.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, it should supposedly never happen under normal circumstances. The
> issue I had was because I was using a Marvin zone config that needed
> to be updated for the new feature. Added:
>
> {
>
> "broadcastdomainrange": "ZONE",
>
> "name": "InternalLbVm"
>
> }
>
> This should be configured on zone setup as well. To fix it manually, I did:
>
> # list internalloadbalancerelements
>
> # configure internalloadbalancerelement enabled=true id=<the uuid>
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Marcus.
>>
>> I ran into this on today's master. Did you follow up on this in 4.2?
>> Or do you have a ticket or wiki page for it?
>>
>> tahnks
>> Daan
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2. can't figure out how to deploy VPC. In 4.2 it tells me to jump
>>> through a few extra hoops regarding setting up internal loadbalancer
>>> service first, "Provider InternalLbVm should be enabled in at least
>>> one physical network of the zone specified", so I look at my physical
>>> network -> network service providers and see "Internal LB VM" is
>>> disabled, so I try to enable it and get "Provider is not ready, cannot
>>> Enable the provider, please configure the provider first". I'm stuck,
>>> I don't see anything in the UI that would provide a configuration
>>> dialog for the internal lb provider, nor do I see anything in the
>>> global options. It makes me wonder how upgrades will fare if VPCs are
>>> being used.
Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack
4.2.0 (third round))
Posted by Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com>.
Yes, it should supposedly never happen under normal circumstances. The
issue I had was because I was using a Marvin zone config that needed
to be updated for the new feature. Added:
{
"broadcastdomainrange": "ZONE",
"name": "InternalLbVm"
}
This should be configured on zone setup as well. To fix it manually, I did:
# list internalloadbalancerelements
# configure internalloadbalancerelement enabled=true id=<the uuid>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marcus.
>
> I ran into this on today's master. Did you follow up on this in 4.2?
> Or do you have a ticket or wiki page for it?
>
> tahnks
> Daan
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2. can't figure out how to deploy VPC. In 4.2 it tells me to jump
>> through a few extra hoops regarding setting up internal loadbalancer
>> service first, "Provider InternalLbVm should be enabled in at least
>> one physical network of the zone specified", so I look at my physical
>> network -> network service providers and see "Internal LB VM" is
>> disabled, so I try to enable it and get "Provider is not ready, cannot
>> Enable the provider, please configure the provider first". I'm stuck,
>> I don't see anything in the UI that would provide a configuration
>> dialog for the internal lb provider, nor do I see anything in the
>> global options. It makes me wonder how upgrades will fare if VPCs are
>> being used.