You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com> on 2007/03/23 14:58:23 UTC

Re: svn commit: propchange - r24045 - svn:log

On 3/23/07, lundblad@tigris.org <lu...@tigris.org> wrote:
> Author: lundblad
> Revision: 24045
> Property Name: svn:log
> Action: modified
>
> Property diff:
> --- old property value
> +++ new property value
> @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
>  Split a file into two.
>
> -Suggested by: sanity
> -

Hey!  I got a chuckle out of that - I don't think we need to be so
overly pedantic with our log messages that we can't have some fun with
it.  -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: propchange - r24045 - svn:log

Posted by John Peacock <jp...@rowman.com>.
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Great fun!  If there's a concern about the contribulyzer, maybe we can use
> something the tool won't catch:
> 
>    Suggest3d by: sanity
> 

Would that be consider the "sanity clause"?

<DUCKS and RUNS AWAY FAST>

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: propchange - r24045 - svn:log

Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Peter Lundblad wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz writes:
>>> (BTW, it was my own message I edited, if you didn't notice;)
>> Oh, I know.  I'm just pointing out that such self-censoring seems to
>> be a buzzkill.  -- justin
> 
> OK, it's back.  I just have nothing to do, so why not propedit for a while
> ;)

Great fun!  If there's a concern about the contribulyzer, maybe we can use
something the tool won't catch:

   Suggest3d by: sanity

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand


Re: svn commit: propchange - r24045 - svn:log

Posted by Peter Lundblad <pl...@google.com>.
Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> > (BTW, it was my own message I edited, if you didn't notice;)
> 
> Oh, I know.  I'm just pointing out that such self-censoring seems to
> be a buzzkill.  -- justin

OK, it's back.  I just have nothing to do, so why not propedit for a while
;)

Sorry for the spam, folks,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: propchange - r24045 - svn:log

Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
On 3/23/07, Peter Lundblad <pl...@google.com> wrote:
> Heh, the fun was for the list;)  Question is if we should confuse our
> script that lists who did what, though that might be even more fun;)

If the scripts can't handle a little fun, then they aren't worth having.  =)

> (BTW, it was my own message I edited, if you didn't notice;)

Oh, I know.  I'm just pointing out that such self-censoring seems to
be a buzzkill.  -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: propchange - r24045 - svn:log

Posted by Peter Lundblad <pl...@google.com>.
Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> On 3/23/07, lundblad@tigris.org <lu...@tigris.org> wrote:
> > Author: lundblad
> > Revision: 24045
> > Property Name: svn:log
> > Action: modified
> >
> > Property diff:
> > --- old property value
> > +++ new property value
> > @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
> >  Split a file into two.
> >
> > -Suggested by: sanity
> > -
> 
> Hey!  I got a chuckle out of that - I don't think we need to be so
> overly pedantic with our log messages that we can't have some fun with
> it.  -- justin
> 

Heh, the fun was for the list;)  Question is if we should confuse our
script that lists who did what, though that might be even more fun;)
(BTW, it was my own message I edited, if you didn't notice;)

Thanks,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org