You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Daniel Kulp (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/01/24 20:43:49 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (CXF-389) Make org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl constructor generic

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Daniel Kulp resolved CXF-389.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed


The constructor was changed on 1/24/07.   Future builds should be OK.

> Make org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl constructor generic
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-389
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-389
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JAX-WS Runtime
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-M1
>            Reporter: Bharath Ganesh
>         Assigned To: Daniel Kulp
>             Fix For: 2.0-RC
>
>
> Bharath:
> Currently (in M1 release) the constructor of EndpointImpl looks like
> *public EndpointImpl(Bus b, Object implementor, JaxWsServiceFactoryBean
> serviceFactory).*
> Instead it would be better if it takes an AbstractJaxWsServiceFactoryBean
> instead of JaxWsServiceFactoryBean. This would be helpful for Provider based
> endpoints to use this contructor, since JaxWsServiceFactoryBean and
> ProviderServiceFactoryBean are subclasses of
> AbstractJaxWsServiceFactoryBean.
> Dan: 
> I think that would be fine. I don't see any code specific to to
> JaxWsServiceFactoryBean in the constructor. Could you create a JIRA issue
> for this please?
> Thanks,
> - Dan
> Daniel: 
> Not only possible, but definitely more "correct".   The internal field that is 
> set actually is an AbstractJaxWsServiceFactoryBean:
> private AbstractJaxWsServiceFactoryBean serviceFactory;
> .....
> this.serviceFactory = serviceFactory;
> Nothing in the constructor requires it to be the specific subclass.
> I'll go ahead and make that change. 
> Thanks!
> -- 
> J. Daniel Kulp

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.