[jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-2495) Sqoop2: Provide simple test that can validate if connector is reasonably formed

["Sqoop QA bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15396718#comment-15396718 ] 

Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-2495:
-------------------------------------

Testing file [SQOOP-2495.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12792353/SQOOP-2495.patch] against branch sqoop2 took 0:00:55.172554.

{color:red}Overall:{color} -1 due to an error(s), see details below:

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch add/modify test case
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} License check passed
{color:red}ERROR:{color} failed to build with patch (exit code 1, [report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/2408/artifact/patch-process/install.txt])

Console output is available [here|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/2408/console].

This message is automatically generated.

> Sqoop2: Provide simple test that can validate if connector is reasonably formed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-2495
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2495
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.99.6
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>             Fix For: 1.99.8
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-2495.patch
>
>
> On internal hackathon we we're hacking Sqoop 2 connector with [~singhashish] and we went through few troubles that we should address.
> We have a lot of requirements for Sqoop connectors that are only documented but not enforced by the code, for example:
> * Resource bundles need to have names for all properties in configuration objects
> * Configuration objects needs to be properly annotated
> If either of those is incorrect then we happily load the connector just to throw some random exceptions during runtime. We should provide simple test case that all connectors can reuse to validate that connector is properly formed as Sqoop expects.
> (Which still doesn't mean that the connector will work as we can't guarantee that extractor/loader is properly implemented. But we can at least help people to not see random exceptions such as those described in SQOOP-2494).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)