You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Cliff Woolley <jw...@virginia.edu> on 2003/09/01 01:12:25 UTC

Re: Time for 2.2?

On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Erik Abele wrote:

> Just to prevent any misunderstandings: are we talking about a 2.2
> *alpha* or *beta* release here, or what will it be called? If it's in
> any way marked as *unstable*, then a clear +1 from my side. The recent
> changes are definitely worth to get tested in the wild, IMHO.

The alphas/betas will be called 2.1.x.  2.2.0 wouldn't be released until
2.1.x releases were declared stable.  So, basically, yes.

Re: Time for 2.2?

Posted by Astrid Keßler <ke...@kess-net.de>.

>> Just to prevent any misunderstandings: are we talking about a 2.2
>> *alpha* or *beta* release here, or what will it be called? If it's in
>> any way marked as *unstable*, then a clear +1 from my side. The recent
>> changes are definitely worth to get tested in the wild, IMHO.

> The alphas/betas will be called 2.1.x.  2.2.0 wouldn't be released until
> 2.1.x releases were declared stable.  So, basically, yes.

+1 from me

Kess