You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/09/17 04:14:57 UTC

[GitHub] zhijiangW commented on issue #6697: [hotfix][benchmarks] Add network broadcast benchmark

zhijiangW commented on issue #6697: [hotfix][benchmarks] Add network broadcast benchmark
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6697#issuecomment-421886999
 
 
   @pnowojski , I am supposed to cover the broadcast scenario benchmark later because of #6417, thanks for adding this timely. :)
   
   The codes look good to me, and I only have two additional concerns:  
   
   1. Actually there are two ways to realize broadcast semantics. The first way is via `RecordWriter#broadcastEmit()` as you realized in this PR. The other way is via `RecordWriter#emit(BroadcastChannelSelector)`, and in current `StreamNetworkBenchmarkEnvironment#createRecordWriter` we only define the `RoundRobinChannelSelector` for the writer. If we make the `ChannelSelector` as a parameter, we can also support other partitioner modes, such as `rebalance`, `forward`, etc. How do you consider these two ways?
   
   2. Do we need make the var `broadcastMode` as `@Param({"true","false"})` for covering the existing tests in `StreamNetworkThroughputBenchmarkTest`? Because currently there are no tests in the `StreamNetworkBroadcastThroughputBenchmarkTest`.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services