You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> on 2008/12/03 23:22:47 UTC

Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch

Hi guys,

What's the timeframe on this merge?

Thanks,
Alex

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de> wrote:

> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> There are two branches, apacheds-mina2 and ads-mina2.0. I guess one of
>>> them is obsolete. Shouldn't we remove it?
>>>
>> No, in fact, both are necessary. The ads-mina2.0 branch is equivalent to
>> apacheds-with-dependencies. The other one (apacheds-mina2) is the apacheds
>> sub-project.
>>
>> I should have named the first branch ads-mina2-with-dependencies, making
>> things crystal clear...
>>
>
> Thanks for clarification, Emmanuel
>
>

Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch

Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Excellent - thanks for the update.

Alex

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> What's the timeframe on this merge?
>>
>>
> Hi Alex,
>
> if we exclude the 72 hours for a vote on MINA 2.0.0-M4, we currently have 7
> issues for this version, 3 of them being bugs. One affects the statemachine,
> and as we received no answer from the guy who wrote this part, I think we
> can differ its resolution (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-604), another one is about
> the TraficClass usage (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-539)
> : totally useless IMHO, and the last one is a bit more annoying, but we may
> have a way to workaround it (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-632).
>
> If we postpone the 4 other issues, which are not really important, then we
> can have a version by monday.
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>

Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch

Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> What's the timeframe on this merge?
>   
Hi Alex,

if we exclude the 72 hours for a vote on MINA 2.0.0-M4, we currently 
have 7 issues for this version, 3 of them being bugs. One affects the 
statemachine, and as we received no answer from the guy who wrote this 
part, I think we can differ its resolution 
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-604), another one is 
about the TraficClass usage 
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-539) : totally useless 
IMHO, and the last one is a bit more annoying, but we may have a way to 
workaround it (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-632).

If we postpone the 4 other issues, which are not really important, then 
we can have a version by monday.

-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org