You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net> on 2006/04/25 19:36:14 UTC
Re: more questions on training spamassassin
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:30:47AM -0700, Webmaster wrote:
> In my setup, the server running spamassassin is different than the server
> delivering the final e-mail. This means a few extra headers will be added
> by the time the clients see the e-mail.
> So my question is, is it even worthwhile to train spamassassin manually in
> this scenario ?
If you're just talking about adding in some Received headers and the usual
stuff associated with delivery, that's fine. If something massive happens
between receiving the mail and delivering it, that's a different issue.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"And, although some really nasty mind-games were played, no entities were
physically harmed during the making of this interactive entertainment
(except for the botched special-effect on the bunny rabbit that went so
horribly wrong and really bummed everyone out, no thanks to Mr. Boomer)."
- From the 7th Guest
RE: more questions on training spamassassin
Posted by Webmaster <we...@hostation.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@kluge.net]
> Sent: April 25, 2006 10:36 AM
> To: Spamassassin Users List
> Subject: Re: more questions on training spamassassin
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:30:47AM -0700, Webmaster wrote:
> > In my setup, the server running spamassassin is different than the
> > server delivering the final e-mail. This means a few extra headers
> > will be added by the time the clients see the e-mail.
> > So my question is, is it even worthwhile to train spamassassin
> > manually in this scenario ?
>
> If you're just talking about adding in some Received headers
> and the usual stuff associated with delivery, that's fine.
> If something massive happens between receiving the mail and
> delivering it, that's a different issue.
>
Yep, just a few received headers.
Thanks.