You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> on 2006/10/27 21:03:29 UTC

Time to get rid of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec?

I've been doing some thinking about the openejb corba dependencies.  The 
project is still carrying a dependency on the geronimo-corba_2.3_spec 
jar file, plus now has a dependency on the yoko-corba-spec jar file.  
However, except for its use in compiling the openejb2 code, the 
geronimo-corba_2.3_spec jar is non-functional because it's not getting 
placed on the endorsed.dirs path.  This jar gets loaded as overhead, but 
non of the classes will ever be used because the yoko ones will be 
picked up by the system class loader. 

As an experiment, I replaced all of the geronimo-corba_2.3_spec 
dependencies with the yoko version, and everything appears to build and 
run just fine.  I think maybe it's time to scrap that particular jar.

Rick

Re: Time to get rid of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec?

Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 10/30/06, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok, JIRA opened and patches uploaded.  I'm going to need somebody to
>> commit these for me.
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-301
>
> Downloaded 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12343896/OPENEJB-301.patch, 
>
> patched, built and committed as revision 469139.
>
> Will you handle Geronimo or do you need some help?
I can handle the Geronimo.  Thanks for doing the openejb patch so quickly.

>
> Thanks Rick!
>
> Jacek
>


Re: Time to get rid of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec?

Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 10/30/06, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, JIRA opened and patches uploaded.  I'm going to need somebody to
> commit these for me.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-301

Downloaded http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12343896/OPENEJB-301.patch,
patched, built and committed as revision 469139.

Will you handle Geronimo or do you need some help?

Thanks Rick!

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl

Re: Time to get rid of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec?

Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Ok, JIRA opened and patches uploaded.  I'm going to need somebody to 
commit these for me. 

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-301

Rick

Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 10/27/06, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As an experiment, I replaced all of the geronimo-corba_2.3_spec
>> dependencies with the yoko version, and everything appears to build and
>> run just fine.  I think maybe it's time to scrap that particular jar.
>
> +100000
>
> Report it in JIRA and go for it.
>
> Jacek
>


Re: Time to get rid of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec?

Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 10/27/06, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As an experiment, I replaced all of the geronimo-corba_2.3_spec
> dependencies with the yoko version, and everything appears to build and
> run just fine.  I think maybe it's time to scrap that particular jar.

+100000

Report it in JIRA and go for it.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl

Re: Time to get rid of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec?

Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
Sounds good.

-dain

On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> I've been doing some thinking about the openejb corba  
> dependencies.  The project is still carrying a dependency on the  
> geronimo-corba_2.3_spec jar file, plus now has a dependency on the  
> yoko-corba-spec jar file.  However, except for its use in compiling  
> the openejb2 code, the geronimo-corba_2.3_spec jar is non- 
> functional because it's not getting placed on the endorsed.dirs  
> path.  This jar gets loaded as overhead, but non of the classes  
> will ever be used because the yoko ones will be picked up by the  
> system class loader.
> As an experiment, I replaced all of the geronimo-corba_2.3_spec  
> dependencies with the yoko version, and everything appears to build  
> and run just fine.  I think maybe it's time to scrap that  
> particular jar.
>
> Rick