You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@manifoldcf.apache.org by Dileepa Jayakody <dj...@zaizi.com> on 2016/01/26 09:20:30 UTC
Re: ManifoldCF transformation connector for Apache Stanbol
Hi All,
I have done the discussed modifications to the Stanbol connector. Now the
users can either define dereference fields or define a LDPath program to
extract entity properties from Stanbol entities and add them to the
document as fields.
The latest code is available here for your review:
https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
I have also written a blog post on how to configure the connector:
http://dileepajayakody.blogspot.com/2016/01/enhancing-documents-in-apache.html
Looking forward to your comments.
Thanks,
Dileepa
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> I will import this one, don't worry.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafa
> El El sáb, 12 dic 2015 a las 20:36, Dileepa Jayakody <dj...@zaizi.com>
> escribió:
>
> > Hi Karl,
> >
> > Yes, I will improve the code with Rafa's reviews and then we can import
> it
> > to mcf code base.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dileepa
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, it seems premature for me to try to import this from Github today,
> so
> > > I'll wait until the dust settles a bit further first.
> > >
> > > Karl
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Dileepa Jayakody <djayakody@zaizi.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks a lot Rafa for pointing that out. big miss as I didn't test
> the
> > > > LDPath configuration part yet. More improvements to be done.
> > > > I will do the required mprovements as pointed out.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Dileepa
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem is not in that part on the code, it is rather on this
> > part:
> > > > >
> > > > > if (entity != null) { Collection<String> properties = entity.
> > > > > getProperties(); for (String property : properties) { String
> > > > > targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property); Set<String>
> propValues =
> > > > > entityPropertyMap.get(targetFieldName); if (propValues == null) {
> > > > > propValues = new HashSet<String>(); } Collection<String>
> > > > entityPropValues =
> > > > > entity.getPropertyValues(property);
> > > propValues.addAll(entityPropValues);
> > > > > entityPropertyMap.put(targetFieldName, propValues); } }
> > > > > You are collecting from the EnhancementStructure response just only
> > the
> > > > > configured dereferenced fields and LDPath fields are ignored. Also,
> > > there
> > > > > is a potential bug in that code if there is no dereferencing field
> > > > > configured for a certain entity property here:
> > > > >
> > > > > String targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property);
> > > > >
> > > > > targetFieldName would be Null then. Instead of trying to index
> every
> > > > > property, you should just collect the configured ones by the user
> (or
> > > at
> > > > > least, if the user wants all of them, provide a configuration
> option
> > > for
> > > > > that).
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, going back to LDPath issue, please take into account that
> > when
> > > > you
> > > > > define a field you must use a custom Namespace and Prefix for later
> > > being
> > > > > able to retrieve that property from the entity. If you don't do
> that,
> > > > > Stanbol will provide a random namespace for that property. Check
> this
> > > > > example from RedLink SDK:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/redlink-gmbh/redlink-java-sdk/blob/master/src/test/java/io/redlink/sdk/AnalysisTest.java#L423-443
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope that helps
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:57 PM Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The next step would be to pull this code into an svn branch.
> This
> > is
> > > > > > something I can tackled after the 2.3 release candidate is put
> > > > together.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Karl
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Rafa,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing my code and for your feedback. Please see
> my
> > > > > > comments
> > > > > > > inline below.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This seems to be going in the right direction clearly now in
> my
> > > > > > opinion.
> > > > > > > > Quick comments after a first review:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Rejecting a document because it can't be enhanced is
> kind
> > of
> > > > > > tough.
> > > > > > > > You are preventing a document to be finally indexed
> because
> > > the
> > > > > > > > enhancement
> > > > > > > > didn't perform correctly, probably it is better just to
> let
> > > them
> > > > > > > > continue
> > > > > > > > the workflow within the system
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Got your point. Will remove that part from the code
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - As I can deduce for the code, you are correctly
> extracting
> > > the
> > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields, but you are not processing
> > at
> > > > all
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > LDPath results
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm passing the LDPath program as an enhancer parameter to
> > > Stanbol
> > > > to
> > > > > > > retrieve the enhancement result according to the LDPath program
> > > > (which
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > given as a text string in the connector UI).
> > > > > > > If the user has not defined a LDPath program and added
> derefence
> > > > fields
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > the UI instead, then the enhancement request will be built
> using
> > > the
> > > > > > > dereference fields as enhancer parameters.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If neither a LDPath or dereference fields are given in the
> > > > > transformation
> > > > > > > UI, then I just call the given enhancement chain without any
> > other
> > > > > > enhancer
> > > > > > > paramaters.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please refer below code segment where I do this and let me know
> > if
> > > it
> > > > > > needs
> > > > > > > more improvements.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > // ldpath program is given priority if it's set
> > > > > > > if (ldPath != null)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setLDpathProgram(ldPath).build();
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > else if (!derefFields.isEmpty())
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setDereferencingFields(
> > > > > > > derefFields.keySet()).build();
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).build();
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > eRes = enhancerClient.enhance(parameters);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Rafa
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:05 PM Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As per our discussion I have modified the Stanbol Connector
> > so
> > > > that
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > adds
> > > > > > > > > all extracted entity URIs and entity attributes to the
> > > repository
> > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > as fields.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On a separate branch I have committed this code to our
> github
> > > > > project
> > > > > > > > > sensefy-connectors.
> > > > > > > > > You can find the source code here:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > > > > > > > > Let me know your feedback.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will write a blog post on how to add it in a connection
> and
> > > get
> > > > > > > > > ehancement results and share it with you.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You cannot create sub-documents in a transformation
> > > connector.
> > > > > And
> > > > > > > > > adding
> > > > > > > > > > that capability to the framework is not possible; we
> would
> > be
> > > > > > missing
> > > > > > > > key
> > > > > > > > > > bookkeeping logic if that was allowed.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Karl,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the pointer.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol doesn't update an existing document, it
> > generates a
> > > > new
> > > > > > > > > response
> > > > > > > > > > > with requested enhancement details for the content
> > > enhansment
> > > > > > > > request.
> > > > > > > > > > > For example for a request like : "Paris is a city in
> > > France"
> > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > RDF
> > > > > > > > > > > response [1] is given by Stanbol.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In the Stanbol connector, enhancement artifacts such as
> > > > > > > > TextAnnotations
> > > > > > > > > > > and EntityAnnotations are extracted from the RDF
> > response,
> > > to
> > > > > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > entity abstractions and add them to the mcf repository
> > > > > document.
> > > > > > > > > > Currently
> > > > > > > > > > > in the Stanbol connector we have added these entity
> > > > > abstractions
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > JSON
> > > > > > > > > > > strings to a multi-valued 'entities' field in the
> > > repository
> > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > we parse that JSON in the SolrWrapper output connector
> to
> > > > index
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > separate
> > > > > > > > > > > Solr cores (primary documents, linked entities and
> entity
> > > > types
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > attributes).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Can we can have a primary repository document and
> create
> > > sub
> > > > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > the extracted entities? Is it possible to generate sub
> > > > > documents
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > repo-document in a transformation connector?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [1] Sample Stanbol response
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont": "http://dbpedia.org/ontology/",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:dateTime"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer": "http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/
> ",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:double"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub": "
> > > > > > > > > > http://stanbol.apache.org/ontology/entityhub/entityhub#
> > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/",
> > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "owl": "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#",
> > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema": "http://schema.org/",
> > > > > > > > > > > "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "@graph": [
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/France",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg
> > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg/200px-Flag_of_France.svg.png
> > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France, officially the French
> > Republic,
> > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > > unitary semi-presidential republic in Western Europe
> with
> > > > > several
> > > > > > > > > > > overseas territories and islands located on other
> > > continents
> > > > > and
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic oceans. Metropolitan
> > > France
> > > > > > > extends
> > > > > > > > > > > from the Mediterranean Sea to the English Channel and
> the
> > > > North
> > > > > > > Sea,
> > > > > > > > > > > and from the Rhine to the Atlantic Ocean. It is often
> > > > referred
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > l’Hexagone because of the geometric shape of its
> > > territory."
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Settlement",
> > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg/200px-Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "geo:lat": 48.8567,
> > > > > > > > > > > "geo:long": 2.3508,
> > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is the capital and largest
> city
> > of
> > > > > > France.
> > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > is situated on the river Seine, in northern France, at
> > the
> > > > > heart
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > the Île-de-France region (or Paris Region, French:
> Région
> > > > > > > > parisienne).
> > > > > > > > > > > As of January 2008 the city of Paris, within its
> > > > administrative
> > > > > > > > limits
> > > > > > > > > > > largely unchanged since 1860, has an estimated
> population
> > > of
> > > > > > > > 2,211,297
> > > > > > > > > > > and a metropolitan population of 12,089,098, and is one
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > most
> > > > > > > > > > > populated metropolitan areas in Europe."
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.6017613,
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 5,
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 0
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-b2855552-0e46-62f5-cd33-9f84ab32e547",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 1.0,
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/France
> > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-c50474e4-ea0e-03ff-5db5-a25f4c8dae45",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.25715446,
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Vichy France"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vichy_France",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-de07bc41-e4a1-f510-3f93-99ebfd8c39f4",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.1493264,
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris Commune"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris_Commune",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.99354976,
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 18,
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 12
> > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Repository connectors have an abstraction that allows
> > > them
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > > > > > compound documents (where a document has a primary
> > > > > identifier,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > > are subdocuments that share that primary identifier
> and
> > > > have
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > secondary
> > > > > > > > > > > > identifier). This sounds a bit like what you are
> > > > describing.
> > > > > > > Does
> > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > > > work by decorating an existing document, or does it
> > work
> > > by
> > > > > > > > > generating
> > > > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > > content for a document?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > While thanking you all for your input on Stanbol
> > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > > requirement, I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > would like to continue with modifying the Stanbol
> > > > connector
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > compatible with any output connector. If you guys
> can
> > > > give
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > guidance
> > > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > how the entity metadata should be added to the
> > > repository
> > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > modify the stanbol connector accordingly.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From Rafa's comments, I gathered we can add the
> > entity
> > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > repo.doc as key value pairs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > However this idea is not yet clear to me. There
> could
> > > be
> > > > > 'N'
> > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > entities in a document and each of them will have
> > some
> > > > > common
> > > > > > > > > > > attributes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > such as name, id, type and specific attributes for
> > > > > particular
> > > > > > > > > entity
> > > > > > > > > > > > type.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not clear on how to maintain that structure of
> N
> > > > number
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with their attributes in a repo.document as key
> value
> > > > pairs
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPath compatible for retrieval in an output
> > connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @Rafa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can please elaborate on your suggestion it
> > would
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > greatly
> > > > > > > > > > > > helpful
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > All other suggestions are also welcome.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I, too, agree. Somebody will need to turn this
> > > > connector
> > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > plays by the rules. It may be possible for
> someone
> > > on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > team
> > > > > > > > > > here
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that, but it won't be me; I'm seriously
> > overextended
> > > at
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > moment.
> > > > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be best if someone who knew the connector
> > well
> > > > > could
> > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > work.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Rafa Haro <
> > > > > > > > > rharoapache@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I must agree with Antonio. When I started to
> work
> > > on
> > > > > > this I
> > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > expecting
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the connector to work by just extracting the
> > > entities
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and put them as plain metadata of the
> documents,
> > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPATH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > queries configuration
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is probably ok for Sensefy but I don’t
> think
> > > > this
> > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > suitable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be included in the project. But this is only
> > my
> > > > > > opinion.
> > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > > > course,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version of the connector that fully respect the
> > > > > > ManifoldCF
> > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be more than welcome in my opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Antonio David
> > > Pérez
> > > > > > > Morales
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The removal of the SolrWrapper is a must. It
> > was
> > > a
> > > > > > > > > requirement
> > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > internal project which has nothing to do here
> > > with
> > > > a
> > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > > > > operation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold, so forcing the users to use Solr
> does
> > > not
> > > > > fit
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > philosophy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion, at this moment, a Stanbol
> > > connector
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > big
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency which will not fit almost any use
> > case
> > > > is
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > > > > useful.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should think a way to convert Stanbol
> > > connector
> > > > > > into
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Transformation connector without assuming
> that
> > a
> > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > output
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be used.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-11-13 11:20 GMT+01:00 Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I have developed a Stanbol connector for
> MCF.
> > > You
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > > check
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> github repo here:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It requires the SolrWrapper output connector
> > > which
> > > > > > > indexes
> > > > > > > > > > > > enhanced
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> documents, entities and entityTypes in
> > separate
> > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > cores.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> requires 3 separate solr cores configured
> > with a
> > > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > schema
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> primary documents, entities and entityTypes
> > > > > > separately.
> > > > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > done
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> our specific use-case.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The SolrWrapper code is here :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/output/mcf-solrwrapperconnector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Perhaps we can discuss and remove the
> Stanbol
> > > > > > > connector's
> > > > > > > > > > > > dependency
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> SolrWrapper and have it working with any
> > output
> > > > > > > connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Please note that the Stanbol connector
> > currently
> > > > > has a
> > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > UI
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (editSpecification) which I'm working on at
> > the
> > > > > > moment.
> > > > > > > > > After
> > > > > > > > > > > > fixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> will update here. And also I will provide
> > > > > > documentations
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > configuring
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> the connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Antonio
> David
> > > > Pérez
> > > > > > > > Morales
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> adperezmorales@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Joshua
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > It is not the list for that, but Marmotta
> is
> > > > > already
> > > > > > > > > > > integrated
> > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Stanbol. You can take a look at this issue
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1165
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Anyway, as I said this is not the list for
> > > that,
> > > > > so
> > > > > > > > let's
> > > > > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > proper
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > list for these things.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > 2015-07-09 15:29 GMT+02:00 Joshua Dunham <
> > > > > > > > > > > > joshua.dunham@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Hey Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > In case you were interested, I
> > pinged
> > > > the
> > > > > > > list a
> > > > > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > > > days
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ago
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for integration tips for Apache
> Marmotta.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I got some great tips on how to do this
> > > which
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > > you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Marmotta is a drop in replacement for
> > > Clarezza
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > easier
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for you to take this way.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm not a Java programmer but I'm
> bringing
> > > > this
> > > > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > development
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > staff at my company for assistance. If
> you
> > > > like
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Marmotta
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approach
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > may gain more traction solving the same
> > > > > > integration.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm also integrating Marmotta with
> Stanbol
> > > so
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > effect
> > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > except not using the Stanbol API for
> data
> > > > import
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > favor
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > -J
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:03 AM, Dileepa
> > > > Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks you for the feedback and
> offering
> > > > your
> > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Let me get back to you on where to
> start
> > > the
> > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > base.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > As the first step, I would like to
> start
> > > by
> > > > > > > > creating a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > diagram
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > for the connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I will send the diagram for your
> review
> > > > soon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > This message should be regarded as
> > > > > confidential.
> > > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > email in error please notify the
> sender
> > > and
> > > > > > > destroy
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Statements of intent shall only become
> > > > binding
> > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > > > > confirmed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and
> > > Wales
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is
> Brook
> > > > House,
> > > > > > 229
> > > > > > > > > > > Shepherds
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Road,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> This message should be regarded as
> > confidential.
> > > > If
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> email in error please notify the sender and
> > > > destroy
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Statements of intent shall only become
> binding
> > > > when
> > > > > > > > > confirmed
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales
> > > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook
> House,
> > > 229
> > > > > > > > Shepherds
> > > > > > > > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If
> > you
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy
> > it
> > > > > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when
> > > > > confirmed
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with
> the
> > > > > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229
> > > > > Shepherds
> > > > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you
> > > have
> > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it
> > > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when
> > > confirmed
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the
> > > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229
> > > Shepherds
> > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you
> have
> > > > > received
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it
> > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when
> confirmed
> > > in
> > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the
> > > > registration
> > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229
> Shepherds
> > > Bush
> > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have
> > > received
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it
> > immediately.
> > > > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed
> in
> > > hard
> > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the
> > registration
> > > > > number
> > > > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds
> Bush
> > > > Road,
> > > > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received
> > > this
> > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard
> > > copy
> > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > >
> > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration
> > number
> > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush
> Road,
> > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received
> this
> > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard
> copy
> > by an authorised signatory.
> >
> > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
> > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
> > London W6 7AN.
> >
>
--
------------------------------
This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
by an authorised signatory.
Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
London W6 7AN.
Re: ManifoldCF transformation connector for Apache Stanbol
Posted by Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>.
Hi Karl,
I have just talked with Dileepa and he will be doing the Pull Request, so I
will wait to it
Thanks Dileepa
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:45 PM Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The ticket for this is CONNECTORS-1181. If you are willing, please name
> the branch "branches/CONNECTORS-1181". Thanks!
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If you set up a pull request, and download a .diff, it should be easy to
> > confirm that this will "svn patch" onto a workarea.
> >
> > Karl
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Karl,
> >>
> >> I will proceed in the same way than the OpenNLP connector, so as I ask
> in
> >> the other email, should we do this using Pull request instead of
> manually
> >> importing the master branch of Dileepa's repo?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Rafa
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:07 PM Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Rafa,
> >> >
> >> > Any time you are ready, please import this into a branch. I'll need
> to
> >> > look over licensing and build before committing to trunk.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> > Karl
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> djayakody@zaizi.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi All,
> >> > >
> >> > > I have done the discussed modifications to the Stanbol connector.
> Now
> >> the
> >> > > users can either define dereference fields or define a LDPath
> program
> >> to
> >> > > extract entity properties from Stanbol entities and add them to the
> >> > > document as fields.
> >> > >
> >> > > The latest code is available here for your review:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> >> > >
> >> > > I have also written a blog post on how to configure the connector:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://dileepajayakody.blogspot.com/2016/01/enhancing-documents-in-apache.html
> >> > >
> >> > > Looking forward to your comments.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Dileepa
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Karl,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I will import this one, don't worry.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > Rafa
> >> > > > El El sáb, 12 dic 2015 a las 20:36, Dileepa Jayakody <
> >> > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> >> > > > escribió:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi Karl,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Yes, I will improve the code with Rafa's reviews and then we can
> >> > import
> >> > > > it
> >> > > > > to mcf code base.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks
> >> > > > > Dileepa
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Karl Wright <
> daddywri@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Ok, it seems premature for me to try to import this from
> Github
> >> > > today,
> >> > > > so
> >> > > > > > I'll wait until the dust settles a bit further first.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Karl
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> >> > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks a lot Rafa for pointing that out. big miss as I
> didn't
> >> > test
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > > LDPath configuration part yet. More improvements to be done.
> >> > > > > > > I will do the required mprovements as pointed out.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Regards,
> >> > > > > > > Dileepa
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Rafa Haro <
> rharo@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > The problem is not in that part on the code, it is rather
> on
> >> > this
> >> > > > > part:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > if (entity != null) { Collection<String> properties =
> >> entity.
> >> > > > > > > > getProperties(); for (String property : properties) {
> String
> >> > > > > > > > targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property); Set<String>
> >> > > > propValues =
> >> > > > > > > > entityPropertyMap.get(targetFieldName); if (propValues ==
> >> > null) {
> >> > > > > > > > propValues = new HashSet<String>(); } Collection<String>
> >> > > > > > > entityPropValues =
> >> > > > > > > > entity.getPropertyValues(property);
> >> > > > > > propValues.addAll(entityPropValues);
> >> > > > > > > > entityPropertyMap.put(targetFieldName, propValues); } }
> >> > > > > > > > You are collecting from the EnhancementStructure response
> >> just
> >> > > only
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields and LDPath fields are
> >> ignored.
> >> > > Also,
> >> > > > > > there
> >> > > > > > > > is a potential bug in that code if there is no
> dereferencing
> >> > > field
> >> > > > > > > > configured for a certain entity property here:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > String targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property);
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > targetFieldName would be Null then. Instead of trying to
> >> index
> >> > > > every
> >> > > > > > > > property, you should just collect the configured ones by
> the
> >> > user
> >> > > > (or
> >> > > > > > at
> >> > > > > > > > least, if the user wants all of them, provide a
> >> configuration
> >> > > > option
> >> > > > > > for
> >> > > > > > > > that).
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Anyway, going back to LDPath issue, please take into
> account
> >> > that
> >> > > > > when
> >> > > > > > > you
> >> > > > > > > > define a field you must use a custom Namespace and Prefix
> >> for
> >> > > later
> >> > > > > > being
> >> > > > > > > > able to retrieve that property from the entity. If you
> >> don't do
> >> > > > that,
> >> > > > > > > > Stanbol will provide a random namespace for that property.
> >> > Check
> >> > > > this
> >> > > > > > > > example from RedLink SDK:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/redlink-gmbh/redlink-java-sdk/blob/master/src/test/java/io/redlink/sdk/AnalysisTest.java#L423-443
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Hope that helps
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:57 PM Karl Wright <
> >> > daddywri@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > The next step would be to pull this code into an svn
> >> branch.
> >> > > > This
> >> > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > something I can tackled after the 2.3 release candidate
> is
> >> > put
> >> > > > > > > together.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > > > Karl
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> >> > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Rafa,
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing my code and for your feedback.
> >> Please
> >> > > see
> >> > > > my
> >> > > > > > > > > comments
> >> > > > > > > > > > inline below.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Rafa Haro <
> >> > rharo@apache.org
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to be going in the right direction
> clearly
> >> now
> >> > > in
> >> > > > my
> >> > > > > > > > > opinion.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Quick comments after a first review:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > - Rejecting a document because it can't be
> >> enhanced is
> >> > > > kind
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > > > tough.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > You are preventing a document to be finally
> indexed
> >> > > > because
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > enhancement
> >> > > > > > > > > > > didn't perform correctly, probably it is better
> >> just
> >> > to
> >> > > > let
> >> > > > > > them
> >> > > > > > > > > > > continue
> >> > > > > > > > > > > the workflow within the system
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Got your point. Will remove that part from the code
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > - As I can deduce for the code, you are correctly
> >> > > > extracting
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields, but you are not
> >> > > processing
> >> > > > > at
> >> > > > > > > all
> >> > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > LDPath results
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm passing the LDPath program as an enhancer
> >> parameter
> >> > to
> >> > > > > > Stanbol
> >> > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > retrieve the enhancement result according to the
> LDPath
> >> > > program
> >> > > > > > > (which
> >> > > > > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > > given as a text string in the connector UI).
> >> > > > > > > > > > If the user has not defined a LDPath program and added
> >> > > > derefence
> >> > > > > > > fields
> >> > > > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > > > the UI instead, then the enhancement request will be
> >> built
> >> > > > using
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > dereference fields as enhancer parameters.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > If neither a LDPath or dereference fields are given in
> >> the
> >> > > > > > > > transformation
> >> > > > > > > > > > UI, then I just call the given enhancement chain
> without
> >> > any
> >> > > > > other
> >> > > > > > > > > enhancer
> >> > > > > > > > > > paramaters.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Please refer below code segment where I do this and
> let
> >> me
> >> > > know
> >> > > > > if
> >> > > > > > it
> >> > > > > > > > > needs
> >> > > > > > > > > > more improvements.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > // ldpath program is given priority if
> it's
> >> set
> >> > > > > > > > > > if (ldPath != null)
> >> > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setLDpathProgram(ldPath).build();
> >> > > > > > > > > > }
> >> > > > > > > > > > else if (!derefFields.isEmpty())
> >> > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setDereferencingFields(
> >> > > > > > > > > > derefFields.keySet()).build();
> >> > > > > > > > > > }
> >> > > > > > > > > > else
> >> > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).build();
> >> > > > > > > > > > }
> >> > > > > > > > > > eRes = enhancerClient.enhance(parameters);
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Rafa
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:05 PM Dileepa Jayakody <
> >> > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > As per our discussion I have modified the Stanbol
> >> > > Connector
> >> > > > > so
> >> > > > > > > that
> >> > > > > > > > > it
> >> > > > > > > > > > > adds
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > all extracted entity URIs and entity attributes to
> >> the
> >> > > > > > repository
> >> > > > > > > > > > > document
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > as fields.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On a separate branch I have committed this code to
> >> our
> >> > > > github
> >> > > > > > > > project
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > sensefy-connectors.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > You can find the source code here:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know your feedback.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > I will write a blog post on how to add it in a
> >> > connection
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > > > get
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > ehancement results and share it with you.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Karl Wright <
> >> > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > You cannot create sub-documents in a
> >> transformation
> >> > > > > > connector.
> >> > > > > > > > And
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > adding
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > that capability to the framework is not
> possible;
> >> we
> >> > > > would
> >> > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > > > missing
> >> > > > > > > > > > > key
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > bookkeeping logic if that was allowed.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Dileepa
> Jayakody <
> >> > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Karl,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the pointer.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol doesn't update an existing document,
> it
> >> > > > > generates a
> >> > > > > > > new
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > response
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with requested enhancement details for the
> >> content
> >> > > > > > enhansment
> >> > > > > > > > > > > request.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example for a request like : "Paris is a
> >> city
> >> > in
> >> > > > > > France"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > following
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > RDF
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > response [1] is given by Stanbol.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Stanbol connector, enhancement
> artifacts
> >> > such
> >> > > as
> >> > > > > > > > > > > TextAnnotations
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and EntityAnnotations are extracted from the
> RDF
> >> > > > > response,
> >> > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > > generate
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > entity abstractions and add them to the mcf
> >> > > repository
> >> > > > > > > > document.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the Stanbol connector we have added these
> >> entity
> >> > > > > > > > abstractions
> >> > > > > > > > > as
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > JSON
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > strings to a multi-valued 'entities' field in
> >> the
> >> > > > > > repository
> >> > > > > > > > > > document
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we parse that JSON in the SolrWrapper output
> >> > > connector
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > > > index
> >> > > > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > separate
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Solr cores (primary documents, linked entities
> >> and
> >> > > > entity
> >> > > > > > > types
> >> > > > > > > > > > with
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > their
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attributes).
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we can have a primary repository document
> >> and
> >> > > > create
> >> > > > > > sub
> >> > > > > > > > > > > documents
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the extracted entities? Is it possible to
> >> generate
> >> > > sub
> >> > > > > > > > documents
> >> > > > > > > > > > for
> >> > > > > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo-document in a transformation connector?
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] Sample Stanbol response
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@context": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont": "http://dbpedia.org/ontology/
> ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:dateTime"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer": "
> >> > > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/
> >> > > > ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:double"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub": "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > http://stanbol.apache.org/ontology/entityhub/entityhub#
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl": "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs": "
> >> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
> >> > ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema": "http://schema.org/",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
> "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@graph": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "
> >> http://dbpedia.org/resource/France",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature
> ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg/200px-Flag_of_France.svg.png
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France, officially the
> French
> >> > > > > Republic,
> >> > > > > > > is a
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unitary semi-presidential republic in Western
> >> > Europe
> >> > > > with
> >> > > > > > > > several
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > overseas territories and islands located on
> >> other
> >> > > > > > continents
> >> > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic oceans.
> >> > > Metropolitan
> >> > > > > > France
> >> > > > > > > > > > extends
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the Mediterranean Sea to the English
> >> Channel
> >> > and
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > > North
> >> > > > > > > > > > Sea,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and from the Rhine to the Atlantic Ocean. It
> is
> >> > often
> >> > > > > > > referred
> >> > > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > as
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > l’Hexagone because of the geometric shape of
> its
> >> > > > > > territory."
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "
> http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris
> >> ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Settlement",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature
> ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg/200px-Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:lat": 48.8567,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:long": 2.3508,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is the capital and
> >> largest
> >> > > > city
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > > > France.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > It
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is situated on the river Seine, in northern
> >> France,
> >> > > at
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > heart
> >> > > > > > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Île-de-France region (or Paris Region,
> >> French:
> >> > > > Région
> >> > > > > > > > > > > parisienne).
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > As of January 2008 the city of Paris, within
> its
> >> > > > > > > administrative
> >> > > > > > > > > > > limits
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > largely unchanged since 1860, has an estimated
> >> > > > population
> >> > > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 2,211,297
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and a metropolitan population of 12,089,098,
> >> and is
> >> > > one
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > most
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > populated metropolitan areas in Europe."
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created":
> "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.6017613,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 5,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 0
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> "urn:enhancement-b2855552-0e46-62f5-cd33-9f84ab32e547",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created":
> "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 1.0,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/France
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature
> ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> "urn:enhancement-c50474e4-ea0e-03ff-5db5-a25f4c8dae45",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created":
> "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.25715446,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Vichy France"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vichy_France",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature
> ",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> "urn:enhancement-de07bc41-e4a1-f510-3f93-99ebfd8c39f4",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created":
> "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.1493264,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris Commune"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris_Commune",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created":
> "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.99354976,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 18,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 12
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Karl Wright <
> >> > > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Repository connectors have an abstraction
> that
> >> > > allows
> >> > > > > > them
> >> > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > generate
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compound documents (where a document has a
> >> > primary
> >> > > > > > > > identifier,
> >> > > > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > there
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are subdocuments that share that primary
> >> > identifier
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > > > > have
> >> > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > secondary
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > identifier). This sounds a bit like what
> you
> >> are
> >> > > > > > > describing.
> >> > > > > > > > > > Does
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > work by decorating an existing document, or
> >> does
> >> > it
> >> > > > > work
> >> > > > > > by
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > generating
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > all
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > content for a document?
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Dileepa
> >> Jayakody
> >> > <
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While thanking you all for your input on
> >> > Stanbol
> >> > > > > > > connector
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > requirement, I
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would like to continue with modifying the
> >> > Stanbol
> >> > > > > > > connector
> >> > > > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compatible with any output connector. If
> you
> >> > guys
> >> > > > can
> >> > > > > > > give
> >> > > > > > > > > some
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > guidance
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how the entity metadata should be added to
> >> the
> >> > > > > > repository
> >> > > > > > > > > > > document
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > I
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > can
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > modify the stanbol connector accordingly.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From Rafa's comments, I gathered we can
> add
> >> the
> >> > > > > entity
> >> > > > > > > > > metadata
> >> > > > > > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo.doc as key value pairs.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However this idea is not yet clear to me.
> >> There
> >> > > > could
> >> > > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > > 'N'
> >> > > > > > > > > > > number
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entities in a document and each of them
> will
> >> > have
> >> > > > > some
> >> > > > > > > > common
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attributes
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such as name, id, type and specific
> >> attributes
> >> > > for
> >> > > > > > > > particular
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > entity
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > type.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not clear on how to maintain that
> >> structure
> >> > > of
> >> > > > N
> >> > > > > > > number
> >> > > > > > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > entities
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with their attributes in a repo.document
> as
> >> key
> >> > > > value
> >> > > > > > > pairs
> >> > > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > make
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > them
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPath compatible for retrieval in an
> output
> >> > > > > connector.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Rafa
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can please elaborate on your
> >> suggestion
> >> > it
> >> > > > > would
> >> > > > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > > > > > greatly
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helpful
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to me.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All other suggestions are also welcome.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Karl
> >> Wright <
> >> > > > > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I, too, agree. Somebody will need to
> turn
> >> > this
> >> > > > > > > connector
> >> > > > > > > > > > into
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > one
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > plays by the rules. It may be possible
> >> for
> >> > > > someone
> >> > > > > > on
> >> > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > team
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > here
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that, but it won't be me; I'm seriously
> >> > > > > overextended
> >> > > > > > at
> >> > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > moment.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be best if someone who knew the
> >> > connector
> >> > > > > well
> >> > > > > > > > could
> >> > > > > > > > > do
> >> > > > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > work.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Rafa
> >> Haro <
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > rharoapache@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I must agree with Antonio. When I
> >> started
> >> > to
> >> > > > work
> >> > > > > > on
> >> > > > > > > > > this I
> >> > > > > > > > > > > was
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expecting
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the connector to work by just
> extracting
> >> > the
> >> > > > > > entities
> >> > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > entities
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and put them as plain metadata of the
> >> > > > documents,
> >> > > > > > > > probably
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > following
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPATH
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > queries configuration
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is probably ok for Sensefy but I
> >> don’t
> >> > > > think
> >> > > > > > > this
> >> > > > > > > > > > could
> >> > > > > > > > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suitable
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be included in the project. But
> this
> >> is
> >> > > only
> >> > > > > my
> >> > > > > > > > > opinion.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Of
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > course,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version of the connector that fully
> >> respect
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > ManifoldCF
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be more than welcome in my
> opinion
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:38 AM,
> >> Antonio
> >> > > David
> >> > > > > > Pérez
> >> > > > > > > > > > Morales
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The removal of the SolrWrapper is a
> >> must.
> >> > > It
> >> > > > > was
> >> > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > requirement
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > internal project which has nothing
> to
> >> do
> >> > > here
> >> > > > > > with
> >> > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > normal
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > operation
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold, so forcing the users to
> use
> >> > Solr
> >> > > > does
> >> > > > > > not
> >> > > > > > > > fit
> >> > > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > philosophy.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion, at this moment, a
> >> Stanbol
> >> > > > > > connector
> >> > > > > > > > with
> >> > > > > > > > > > > such
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > big
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency which will not fit almost
> >> any
> >> > > use
> >> > > > > case
> >> > > > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > not
> >> > > > > > > > > > > very
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > useful.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should think a way to convert
> >> Stanbol
> >> > > > > > connector
> >> > > > > > > > > into
> >> > > > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > normal
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Transformation connector without
> >> assuming
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > specific
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > output
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connector
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be used.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-11-13 11:20 GMT+01:00 Dileepa
> >> > > Jayakody <
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi guys,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I have developed a Stanbol
> connector
> >> for
> >> > > > MCF.
> >> > > > > > You
> >> > > >
Re: ManifoldCF transformation connector for Apache Stanbol
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
The ticket for this is CONNECTORS-1181. If you are willing, please name
the branch "branches/CONNECTORS-1181". Thanks!
Karl
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you set up a pull request, and download a .diff, it should be easy to
> confirm that this will "svn patch" onto a workarea.
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> I will proceed in the same way than the OpenNLP connector, so as I ask in
>> the other email, should we do this using Pull request instead of manually
>> importing the master branch of Dileepa's repo?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rafa
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:07 PM Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Rafa,
>> >
>> > Any time you are ready, please import this into a branch. I'll need to
>> > look over licensing and build before committing to trunk.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Karl
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <dj...@zaizi.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > I have done the discussed modifications to the Stanbol connector. Now
>> the
>> > > users can either define dereference fields or define a LDPath program
>> to
>> > > extract entity properties from Stanbol entities and add them to the
>> > > document as fields.
>> > >
>> > > The latest code is available here for your review:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
>> > >
>> > > I have also written a blog post on how to configure the connector:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://dileepajayakody.blogspot.com/2016/01/enhancing-documents-in-apache.html
>> > >
>> > > Looking forward to your comments.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Dileepa
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Karl,
>> > > >
>> > > > I will import this one, don't worry.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Rafa
>> > > > El El sáb, 12 dic 2015 a las 20:36, Dileepa Jayakody <
>> > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
>> > > > escribió:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Karl,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Yes, I will improve the code with Rafa's reviews and then we can
>> > import
>> > > > it
>> > > > > to mcf code base.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > Dileepa
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Ok, it seems premature for me to try to import this from Github
>> > > today,
>> > > > so
>> > > > > > I'll wait until the dust settles a bit further first.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Karl
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Dileepa Jayakody <
>> > > djayakody@zaizi.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks a lot Rafa for pointing that out. big miss as I didn't
>> > test
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > LDPath configuration part yet. More improvements to be done.
>> > > > > > > I will do the required mprovements as pointed out.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > > Dileepa
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > The problem is not in that part on the code, it is rather on
>> > this
>> > > > > part:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > if (entity != null) { Collection<String> properties =
>> entity.
>> > > > > > > > getProperties(); for (String property : properties) { String
>> > > > > > > > targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property); Set<String>
>> > > > propValues =
>> > > > > > > > entityPropertyMap.get(targetFieldName); if (propValues ==
>> > null) {
>> > > > > > > > propValues = new HashSet<String>(); } Collection<String>
>> > > > > > > entityPropValues =
>> > > > > > > > entity.getPropertyValues(property);
>> > > > > > propValues.addAll(entityPropValues);
>> > > > > > > > entityPropertyMap.put(targetFieldName, propValues); } }
>> > > > > > > > You are collecting from the EnhancementStructure response
>> just
>> > > only
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields and LDPath fields are
>> ignored.
>> > > Also,
>> > > > > > there
>> > > > > > > > is a potential bug in that code if there is no dereferencing
>> > > field
>> > > > > > > > configured for a certain entity property here:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > String targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property);
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > targetFieldName would be Null then. Instead of trying to
>> index
>> > > > every
>> > > > > > > > property, you should just collect the configured ones by the
>> > user
>> > > > (or
>> > > > > > at
>> > > > > > > > least, if the user wants all of them, provide a
>> configuration
>> > > > option
>> > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > that).
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Anyway, going back to LDPath issue, please take into account
>> > that
>> > > > > when
>> > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > define a field you must use a custom Namespace and Prefix
>> for
>> > > later
>> > > > > > being
>> > > > > > > > able to retrieve that property from the entity. If you
>> don't do
>> > > > that,
>> > > > > > > > Stanbol will provide a random namespace for that property.
>> > Check
>> > > > this
>> > > > > > > > example from RedLink SDK:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/redlink-gmbh/redlink-java-sdk/blob/master/src/test/java/io/redlink/sdk/AnalysisTest.java#L423-443
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hope that helps
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:57 PM Karl Wright <
>> > daddywri@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > The next step would be to pull this code into an svn
>> branch.
>> > > > This
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > something I can tackled after the 2.3 release candidate is
>> > put
>> > > > > > > together.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > Karl
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
>> > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Rafa,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing my code and for your feedback.
>> Please
>> > > see
>> > > > my
>> > > > > > > > > comments
>> > > > > > > > > > inline below.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Rafa Haro <
>> > rharo@apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to be going in the right direction clearly
>> now
>> > > in
>> > > > my
>> > > > > > > > > opinion.
>> > > > > > > > > > > Quick comments after a first review:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > - Rejecting a document because it can't be
>> enhanced is
>> > > > kind
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > tough.
>> > > > > > > > > > > You are preventing a document to be finally indexed
>> > > > because
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > enhancement
>> > > > > > > > > > > didn't perform correctly, probably it is better
>> just
>> > to
>> > > > let
>> > > > > > them
>> > > > > > > > > > > continue
>> > > > > > > > > > > the workflow within the system
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Got your point. Will remove that part from the code
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > - As I can deduce for the code, you are correctly
>> > > > extracting
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields, but you are not
>> > > processing
>> > > > > at
>> > > > > > > all
>> > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > LDPath results
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > I'm passing the LDPath program as an enhancer
>> parameter
>> > to
>> > > > > > Stanbol
>> > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > retrieve the enhancement result according to the LDPath
>> > > program
>> > > > > > > (which
>> > > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > > given as a text string in the connector UI).
>> > > > > > > > > > If the user has not defined a LDPath program and added
>> > > > derefence
>> > > > > > > fields
>> > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > the UI instead, then the enhancement request will be
>> built
>> > > > using
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > dereference fields as enhancer parameters.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > If neither a LDPath or dereference fields are given in
>> the
>> > > > > > > > transformation
>> > > > > > > > > > UI, then I just call the given enhancement chain without
>> > any
>> > > > > other
>> > > > > > > > > enhancer
>> > > > > > > > > > paramaters.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Please refer below code segment where I do this and let
>> me
>> > > know
>> > > > > if
>> > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > > needs
>> > > > > > > > > > more improvements.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > // ldpath program is given priority if it's
>> set
>> > > > > > > > > > if (ldPath != null)
>> > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setLDpathProgram(ldPath).build();
>> > > > > > > > > > }
>> > > > > > > > > > else if (!derefFields.isEmpty())
>> > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setDereferencingFields(
>> > > > > > > > > > derefFields.keySet()).build();
>> > > > > > > > > > }
>> > > > > > > > > > else
>> > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).build();
>> > > > > > > > > > }
>> > > > > > > > > > eRes = enhancerClient.enhance(parameters);
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > > > Rafa
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:05 PM Dileepa Jayakody <
>> > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > As per our discussion I have modified the Stanbol
>> > > Connector
>> > > > > so
>> > > > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > > > > adds
>> > > > > > > > > > > > all extracted entity URIs and entity attributes to
>> the
>> > > > > > repository
>> > > > > > > > > > > document
>> > > > > > > > > > > > as fields.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > On a separate branch I have committed this code to
>> our
>> > > > github
>> > > > > > > > project
>> > > > > > > > > > > > sensefy-connectors.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > You can find the source code here:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know your feedback.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > I will write a blog post on how to add it in a
>> > connection
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > get
>> > > > > > > > > > > > ehancement results and share it with you.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Karl Wright <
>> > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > You cannot create sub-documents in a
>> transformation
>> > > > > > connector.
>> > > > > > > > And
>> > > > > > > > > > > > adding
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > that capability to the framework is not possible;
>> we
>> > > > would
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > missing
>> > > > > > > > > > > key
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > bookkeeping logic if that was allowed.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
>> > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Karl,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the pointer.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol doesn't update an existing document, it
>> > > > > generates a
>> > > > > > > new
>> > > > > > > > > > > > response
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with requested enhancement details for the
>> content
>> > > > > > enhansment
>> > > > > > > > > > > request.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example for a request like : "Paris is a
>> city
>> > in
>> > > > > > France"
>> > > > > > > > > > > following
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > RDF
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > response [1] is given by Stanbol.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Stanbol connector, enhancement artifacts
>> > such
>> > > as
>> > > > > > > > > > > TextAnnotations
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and EntityAnnotations are extracted from the RDF
>> > > > > response,
>> > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > generate
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > entity abstractions and add them to the mcf
>> > > repository
>> > > > > > > > document.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the Stanbol connector we have added these
>> entity
>> > > > > > > > abstractions
>> > > > > > > > > as
>> > > > > > > > > > > > JSON
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > strings to a multi-valued 'entities' field in
>> the
>> > > > > > repository
>> > > > > > > > > > document
>> > > > > > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we parse that JSON in the SolrWrapper output
>> > > connector
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > > index
>> > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > separate
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Solr cores (primary documents, linked entities
>> and
>> > > > entity
>> > > > > > > types
>> > > > > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > their
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attributes).
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we can have a primary repository document
>> and
>> > > > create
>> > > > > > sub
>> > > > > > > > > > > documents
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the extracted entities? Is it possible to
>> generate
>> > > sub
>> > > > > > > > documents
>> > > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo-document in a transformation connector?
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] Sample Stanbol response
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@context": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont": "http://dbpedia.org/ontology/",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:dateTime"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer": "
>> > > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/
>> > > > ",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:double"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub": "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > http://stanbol.apache.org/ontology/entityhub/entityhub#
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl": "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs": "
>> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
>> > ",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema": "http://schema.org/",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@graph": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "
>> http://dbpedia.org/resource/France",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg
>> > > > > > > > > > > > ",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg/200px-Flag_of_France.svg.png
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France, officially the French
>> > > > > Republic,
>> > > > > > > is a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unitary semi-presidential republic in Western
>> > Europe
>> > > > with
>> > > > > > > > several
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > overseas territories and islands located on
>> other
>> > > > > > continents
>> > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic oceans.
>> > > Metropolitan
>> > > > > > France
>> > > > > > > > > > extends
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the Mediterranean Sea to the English
>> Channel
>> > and
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > North
>> > > > > > > > > > Sea,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and from the Rhine to the Atlantic Ocean. It is
>> > often
>> > > > > > > referred
>> > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > as
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > l’Hexagone because of the geometric shape of its
>> > > > > > territory."
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris
>> ",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Settlement",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg/200px-Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:lat": 48.8567,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:long": 2.3508,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is the capital and
>> largest
>> > > > city
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > France.
>> > > > > > > > > > > It
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is situated on the river Seine, in northern
>> France,
>> > > at
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > heart
>> > > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Île-de-France region (or Paris Region,
>> French:
>> > > > Région
>> > > > > > > > > > > parisienne).
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > As of January 2008 the city of Paris, within its
>> > > > > > > administrative
>> > > > > > > > > > > limits
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > largely unchanged since 1860, has an estimated
>> > > > population
>> > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > > 2,211,297
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and a metropolitan population of 12,089,098,
>> and is
>> > > one
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > most
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > populated metropolitan areas in Europe."
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
>> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.6017613,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 5,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 0
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
>> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-b2855552-0e46-62f5-cd33-9f84ab32e547",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 1.0,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
>> > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/France
>> > > > > > > > > > > > ",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
>> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-c50474e4-ea0e-03ff-5db5-a25f4c8dae45",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.25715446,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Vichy France"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vichy_France",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
>> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-de07bc41-e4a1-f510-3f93-99ebfd8c39f4",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.1493264,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris Commune"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris_Commune",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
>> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.99354976,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 18,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 12
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Karl Wright <
>> > > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Repository connectors have an abstraction that
>> > > allows
>> > > > > > them
>> > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > generate
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compound documents (where a document has a
>> > primary
>> > > > > > > > identifier,
>> > > > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > there
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are subdocuments that share that primary
>> > identifier
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > > have
>> > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > secondary
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > identifier). This sounds a bit like what you
>> are
>> > > > > > > describing.
>> > > > > > > > > > Does
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > work by decorating an existing document, or
>> does
>> > it
>> > > > > work
>> > > > > > by
>> > > > > > > > > > > > generating
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > all
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > content for a document?
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Dileepa
>> Jayakody
>> > <
>> > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While thanking you all for your input on
>> > Stanbol
>> > > > > > > connector
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > requirement, I
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would like to continue with modifying the
>> > Stanbol
>> > > > > > > connector
>> > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compatible with any output connector. If you
>> > guys
>> > > > can
>> > > > > > > give
>> > > > > > > > > some
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > guidance
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how the entity metadata should be added to
>> the
>> > > > > > repository
>> > > > > > > > > > > document
>> > > > > > > > > > > > I
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > can
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > modify the stanbol connector accordingly.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From Rafa's comments, I gathered we can add
>> the
>> > > > > entity
>> > > > > > > > > metadata
>> > > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo.doc as key value pairs.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However this idea is not yet clear to me.
>> There
>> > > > could
>> > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > 'N'
>> > > > > > > > > > > number
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entities in a document and each of them will
>> > have
>> > > > > some
>> > > > > > > > common
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attributes
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such as name, id, type and specific
>> attributes
>> > > for
>> > > > > > > > particular
>> > > > > > > > > > > > entity
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > type.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not clear on how to maintain that
>> structure
>> > > of
>> > > > N
>> > > > > > > number
>> > > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > entities
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with their attributes in a repo.document as
>> key
>> > > > value
>> > > > > > > pairs
>> > > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > make
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > them
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPath compatible for retrieval in an output
>> > > > > connector.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Rafa
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can please elaborate on your
>> suggestion
>> > it
>> > > > > would
>> > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > > greatly
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helpful
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to me.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All other suggestions are also welcome.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Karl
>> Wright <
>> > > > > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I, too, agree. Somebody will need to turn
>> > this
>> > > > > > > connector
>> > > > > > > > > > into
>> > > > > > > > > > > > one
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > plays by the rules. It may be possible
>> for
>> > > > someone
>> > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > team
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > here
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that, but it won't be me; I'm seriously
>> > > > > overextended
>> > > > > > at
>> > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > moment.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be best if someone who knew the
>> > connector
>> > > > > well
>> > > > > > > > could
>> > > > > > > > > do
>> > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > work.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Rafa
>> Haro <
>> > > > > > > > > > > > rharoapache@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I must agree with Antonio. When I
>> started
>> > to
>> > > > work
>> > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > this I
>> > > > > > > > > > > was
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expecting
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the connector to work by just extracting
>> > the
>> > > > > > entities
>> > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > entities
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and put them as plain metadata of the
>> > > > documents,
>> > > > > > > > probably
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > following
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPATH
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > queries configuration
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is probably ok for Sensefy but I
>> don’t
>> > > > think
>> > > > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > > could
>> > > > > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suitable
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be included in the project. But this
>> is
>> > > only
>> > > > > my
>> > > > > > > > > opinion.
>> > > > > > > > > > > Of
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > course,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version of the connector that fully
>> respect
>> > > the
>> > > > > > > > > ManifoldCF
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be more than welcome in my opinion
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:38 AM,
>> Antonio
>> > > David
>> > > > > > Pérez
>> > > > > > > > > > Morales
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The removal of the SolrWrapper is a
>> must.
>> > > It
>> > > > > was
>> > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > requirement
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > internal project which has nothing to
>> do
>> > > here
>> > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > normal
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > operation
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold, so forcing the users to use
>> > Solr
>> > > > does
>> > > > > > not
>> > > > > > > > fit
>> > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > philosophy.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion, at this moment, a
>> Stanbol
>> > > > > > connector
>> > > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > > > such
>> > > > > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > big
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency which will not fit almost
>> any
>> > > use
>> > > > > case
>> > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > not
>> > > > > > > > > > > very
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > useful.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should think a way to convert
>> Stanbol
>> > > > > > connector
>> > > > > > > > > into
>> > > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > normal
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Transformation connector without
>> assuming
>> > > > that
>> > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > specific
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > output
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connector
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be used.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-11-13 11:20 GMT+01:00 Dileepa
>> > > Jayakody <
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi guys,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I have developed a Stanbol connector
>> for
>> > > > MCF.
>> > > > > > You
>> > > > > > > > can
>> > > > > > > > > > > check
>> > > > > > > > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > out
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> github repo here:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It requires the SolrWrapper output
>> > > connector
>> > > > > > which
>> > > > > > > > > > indexes
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enhanced
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> documents, entities and entityTypes
>> in
>> > > > > separate
>> > > > > > > Solr
>> > > > > > > > > > > cores.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> requires 3 separate solr cores
>> > configured
>> > > > > with a
>> > > > > > > > > > specific
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Solr
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > schema
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> primary documents, entities and
>> > > entityTypes
>> > > > > > > > > separately.
>> > > > > > > > > > > This
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > was
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > done
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> our specific use-case.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The SolrWrapper code is here :
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/output/mcf-solrwrapperconnector
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Perhaps we can discuss and remove the
>> > > > Stanbol
>> > > > > > > > > > connector's
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> SolrWrapper and have it working with
>> any
>> > > > > output
>> > > > > > > > > > connector.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Please note that the Stanbol
>> connector
>> > > > > currently
>> > > > > > > > has a
>> > > > > > > > > > bug
>> > > > > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UI
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (editSpecification) which I'm
>> working on
>> > > at
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > moment.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > After
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fixing
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that I
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> will update here. And also I will
>> > provide
>> > > > > > > > > documentations
>> > > > > > > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > configuring
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> the connector.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Dileepa
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:36 PM,
>> Antonio
>> > > > David
>> > > > > > > Pérez
>> > > > > > > > > > > Morales
>> > > > > > > > > > > > <
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> adperezmorales@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Joshua
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > It is not the list for that, but
>> > > Marmotta
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > > > already
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > integrated
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Stanbol. You can take a look at
>> this
>> > > issue
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1165
>> > > > > > > > > .
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Anyway, as I said this is not the
>> list
>> > > for
>> > > > > > that,
>> > > > > > > > so
>> > > > > > > > > > > let's
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > use
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > proper
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > list for these things.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Regards
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > 2015-07-09 15:29 GMT+02:00 Joshua
>> > > Dunham <
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > joshua.dunham@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Hey Dileepa,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > In case you were
>> interested, I
>> > > > > pinged
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > list a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > few
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ago
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > asking
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for integration tips for Apache
>> > > > Marmotta.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I got some great tips on how to
>> do
>> > > this
>> > > > > > which
>> > > > > > > > > could
>> > > > > > > > > > > help
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Marmotta is a drop in replacement
>> > for
>> > > > > > Clarezza
>> > > > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > may
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > easier
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for you to take this way.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm not a Java programmer but I'm
>> > > > bringing
>> > > > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > > > problem
>> > > > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > development
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > staff at my company for
>> assistance.
>> > If
>> > > > you
>> > > > > > > like
>> > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approach
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> we
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > may gain more traction solving
>> the
>> > > same
>> > > > > > > > > integration.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm also integrating Marmotta
>> with
>> > > > Stanbol
>> > > > > > so
>> > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > effect
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > would
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > same
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > except not using the Stanbol API
>> for
>> > > > data
>> > > > > > > import
>> > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > favor
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > -J
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:03 AM,
>> > Dileepa
>> > > > > > > Jayakody <
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks you for the feedback and
>> > > > offering
>> > > > > > > your
>> > > > > > > > > help
>> > > > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Let me get back to you on
>> where to
>> > > > start
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > code
>> > > > > > > > > > > > base.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > As the first step, I would
>> like to
>> > > > start
>> > > > > > by
>> > > > > > > > > > > creating a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > diagram
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > for the connector.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I will send the diagram for
>> your
>> > > > review
>> > > > > > > soon.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: ManifoldCF transformation connector for Apache Stanbol
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
If you set up a pull request, and download a .diff, it should be easy to
confirm that this will "svn patch" onto a workarea.
Karl
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> I will proceed in the same way than the OpenNLP connector, so as I ask in
> the other email, should we do this using Pull request instead of manually
> importing the master branch of Dileepa's repo?
>
> Cheers,
> Rafa
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:07 PM Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rafa,
> >
> > Any time you are ready, please import this into a branch. I'll need to
> > look over licensing and build before committing to trunk.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Karl
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <dj...@zaizi.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I have done the discussed modifications to the Stanbol connector. Now
> the
> > > users can either define dereference fields or define a LDPath program
> to
> > > extract entity properties from Stanbol entities and add them to the
> > > document as fields.
> > >
> > > The latest code is available here for your review:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > >
> > > I have also written a blog post on how to configure the connector:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://dileepajayakody.blogspot.com/2016/01/enhancing-documents-in-apache.html
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your comments.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dileepa
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Karl,
> > > >
> > > > I will import this one, don't worry.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Rafa
> > > > El El sáb, 12 dic 2015 a las 20:36, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Karl,
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, I will improve the code with Rafa's reviews and then we can
> > import
> > > > it
> > > > > to mcf code base.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Dileepa
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, it seems premature for me to try to import this from Github
> > > today,
> > > > so
> > > > > > I'll wait until the dust settles a bit further first.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Karl
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot Rafa for pointing that out. big miss as I didn't
> > test
> > > > the
> > > > > > > LDPath configuration part yet. More improvements to be done.
> > > > > > > I will do the required mprovements as pointed out.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The problem is not in that part on the code, it is rather on
> > this
> > > > > part:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > if (entity != null) { Collection<String> properties = entity.
> > > > > > > > getProperties(); for (String property : properties) { String
> > > > > > > > targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property); Set<String>
> > > > propValues =
> > > > > > > > entityPropertyMap.get(targetFieldName); if (propValues ==
> > null) {
> > > > > > > > propValues = new HashSet<String>(); } Collection<String>
> > > > > > > entityPropValues =
> > > > > > > > entity.getPropertyValues(property);
> > > > > > propValues.addAll(entityPropValues);
> > > > > > > > entityPropertyMap.put(targetFieldName, propValues); } }
> > > > > > > > You are collecting from the EnhancementStructure response
> just
> > > only
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields and LDPath fields are ignored.
> > > Also,
> > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > is a potential bug in that code if there is no dereferencing
> > > field
> > > > > > > > configured for a certain entity property here:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > String targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > targetFieldName would be Null then. Instead of trying to
> index
> > > > every
> > > > > > > > property, you should just collect the configured ones by the
> > user
> > > > (or
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > least, if the user wants all of them, provide a configuration
> > > > option
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > that).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Anyway, going back to LDPath issue, please take into account
> > that
> > > > > when
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > define a field you must use a custom Namespace and Prefix for
> > > later
> > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > able to retrieve that property from the entity. If you don't
> do
> > > > that,
> > > > > > > > Stanbol will provide a random namespace for that property.
> > Check
> > > > this
> > > > > > > > example from RedLink SDK:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/redlink-gmbh/redlink-java-sdk/blob/master/src/test/java/io/redlink/sdk/AnalysisTest.java#L423-443
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hope that helps
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:57 PM Karl Wright <
> > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The next step would be to pull this code into an svn
> branch.
> > > > This
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > something I can tackled after the 2.3 release candidate is
> > put
> > > > > > > together.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Rafa,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing my code and for your feedback.
> Please
> > > see
> > > > my
> > > > > > > > > comments
> > > > > > > > > > inline below.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Rafa Haro <
> > rharo@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to be going in the right direction clearly
> now
> > > in
> > > > my
> > > > > > > > > opinion.
> > > > > > > > > > > Quick comments after a first review:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - Rejecting a document because it can't be enhanced
> is
> > > > kind
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > tough.
> > > > > > > > > > > You are preventing a document to be finally indexed
> > > > because
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > enhancement
> > > > > > > > > > > didn't perform correctly, probably it is better just
> > to
> > > > let
> > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > > continue
> > > > > > > > > > > the workflow within the system
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Got your point. Will remove that part from the code
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - As I can deduce for the code, you are correctly
> > > > extracting
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields, but you are not
> > > processing
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > LDPath results
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm passing the LDPath program as an enhancer parameter
> > to
> > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > retrieve the enhancement result according to the LDPath
> > > program
> > > > > > > (which
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > given as a text string in the connector UI).
> > > > > > > > > > If the user has not defined a LDPath program and added
> > > > derefence
> > > > > > > fields
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > the UI instead, then the enhancement request will be
> built
> > > > using
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > dereference fields as enhancer parameters.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If neither a LDPath or dereference fields are given in
> the
> > > > > > > > transformation
> > > > > > > > > > UI, then I just call the given enhancement chain without
> > any
> > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > enhancer
> > > > > > > > > > paramaters.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please refer below code segment where I do this and let
> me
> > > know
> > > > > if
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > needs
> > > > > > > > > > more improvements.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > // ldpath program is given priority if it's
> set
> > > > > > > > > > if (ldPath != null)
> > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setLDpathProgram(ldPath).build();
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > else if (!derefFields.isEmpty())
> > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setDereferencingFields(
> > > > > > > > > > derefFields.keySet()).build();
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).build();
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > eRes = enhancerClient.enhance(parameters);
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > Rafa
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:05 PM Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > As per our discussion I have modified the Stanbol
> > > Connector
> > > > > so
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > adds
> > > > > > > > > > > > all extracted entity URIs and entity attributes to
> the
> > > > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > > > as fields.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On a separate branch I have committed this code to
> our
> > > > github
> > > > > > > > project
> > > > > > > > > > > > sensefy-connectors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > You can find the source code here:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know your feedback.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I will write a blog post on how to add it in a
> > connection
> > > > and
> > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > > ehancement results and share it with you.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You cannot create sub-documents in a transformation
> > > > > > connector.
> > > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > > > > > > adding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that capability to the framework is not possible;
> we
> > > > would
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > missing
> > > > > > > > > > > key
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bookkeeping logic if that was allowed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Karl,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the pointer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol doesn't update an existing document, it
> > > > > generates a
> > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > > response
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with requested enhancement details for the
> content
> > > > > > enhansment
> > > > > > > > > > > request.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example for a request like : "Paris is a city
> > in
> > > > > > France"
> > > > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > RDF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > response [1] is given by Stanbol.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Stanbol connector, enhancement artifacts
> > such
> > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > TextAnnotations
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and EntityAnnotations are extracted from the RDF
> > > > > response,
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > entity abstractions and add them to the mcf
> > > repository
> > > > > > > > document.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the Stanbol connector we have added these
> entity
> > > > > > > > abstractions
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSON
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > strings to a multi-valued 'entities' field in the
> > > > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we parse that JSON in the SolrWrapper output
> > > connector
> > > > to
> > > > > > > index
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > separate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Solr cores (primary documents, linked entities
> and
> > > > entity
> > > > > > > types
> > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attributes).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we can have a primary repository document and
> > > > create
> > > > > > sub
> > > > > > > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the extracted entities? Is it possible to
> generate
> > > sub
> > > > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo-document in a transformation connector?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] Sample Stanbol response
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont": "http://dbpedia.org/ontology/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:dateTime"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer": "
> > > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/
> > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:double"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub": "
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > http://stanbol.apache.org/ontology/entityhub/entityhub#
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl": "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs": "
> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
> > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema": "http://schema.org/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@graph": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/France
> ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg
> > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg/200px-Flag_of_France.svg.png
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France, officially the French
> > > > > Republic,
> > > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unitary semi-presidential republic in Western
> > Europe
> > > > with
> > > > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > overseas territories and islands located on other
> > > > > > continents
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic oceans.
> > > Metropolitan
> > > > > > France
> > > > > > > > > > extends
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the Mediterranean Sea to the English Channel
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > > > North
> > > > > > > > > > Sea,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and from the Rhine to the Atlantic Ocean. It is
> > often
> > > > > > > referred
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > l’Hexagone because of the geometric shape of its
> > > > > > territory."
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris
> ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Settlement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg/200px-Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:lat": 48.8567,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:long": 2.3508,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is the capital and
> largest
> > > > city
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > France.
> > > > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is situated on the river Seine, in northern
> France,
> > > at
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > heart
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Île-de-France region (or Paris Region,
> French:
> > > > Région
> > > > > > > > > > > parisienne).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > As of January 2008 the city of Paris, within its
> > > > > > > administrative
> > > > > > > > > > > limits
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > largely unchanged since 1860, has an estimated
> > > > population
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > 2,211,297
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and a metropolitan population of 12,089,098, and
> is
> > > one
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > most
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > populated metropolitan areas in Europe."
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.6017613,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 5,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 0
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-b2855552-0e46-62f5-cd33-9f84ab32e547",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 1.0,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/France
> > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-c50474e4-ea0e-03ff-5db5-a25f4c8dae45",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.25715446,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Vichy France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vichy_France",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-de07bc41-e4a1-f510-3f93-99ebfd8c39f4",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.1493264,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris Commune"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris_Commune",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.99354976,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 18,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 12
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Repository connectors have an abstraction that
> > > allows
> > > > > > them
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compound documents (where a document has a
> > primary
> > > > > > > > identifier,
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are subdocuments that share that primary
> > identifier
> > > > and
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > secondary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > identifier). This sounds a bit like what you
> are
> > > > > > > describing.
> > > > > > > > > > Does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > work by decorating an existing document, or
> does
> > it
> > > > > work
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > > generating
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > content for a document?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Dileepa
> Jayakody
> > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While thanking you all for your input on
> > Stanbol
> > > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > requirement, I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would like to continue with modifying the
> > Stanbol
> > > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compatible with any output connector. If you
> > guys
> > > > can
> > > > > > > give
> > > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > guidance
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how the entity metadata should be added to
> the
> > > > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > modify the stanbol connector accordingly.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From Rafa's comments, I gathered we can add
> the
> > > > > entity
> > > > > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo.doc as key value pairs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However this idea is not yet clear to me.
> There
> > > > could
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > 'N'
> > > > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entities in a document and each of them will
> > have
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > > common
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attributes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such as name, id, type and specific
> attributes
> > > for
> > > > > > > > particular
> > > > > > > > > > > > entity
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > type.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not clear on how to maintain that
> structure
> > > of
> > > > N
> > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with their attributes in a repo.document as
> key
> > > > value
> > > > > > > pairs
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPath compatible for retrieval in an output
> > > > > connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Rafa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can please elaborate on your
> suggestion
> > it
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > greatly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helpful
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All other suggestions are also welcome.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Karl Wright
> <
> > > > > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I, too, agree. Somebody will need to turn
> > this
> > > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > plays by the rules. It may be possible for
> > > > someone
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > team
> > > > > > > > > > > > > here
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that, but it won't be me; I'm seriously
> > > > > overextended
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > moment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be best if someone who knew the
> > connector
> > > > > well
> > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > work.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Rafa Haro
> <
> > > > > > > > > > > > rharoapache@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I must agree with Antonio. When I started
> > to
> > > > work
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > this I
> > > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expecting
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the connector to work by just extracting
> > the
> > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and put them as plain metadata of the
> > > > documents,
> > > > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPATH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > queries configuration
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is probably ok for Sensefy but I
> don’t
> > > > think
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suitable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be included in the project. But this
> is
> > > only
> > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > opinion.
> > > > > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > course,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version of the connector that fully
> respect
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > ManifoldCF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be more than welcome in my opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Antonio
> > > David
> > > > > > Pérez
> > > > > > > > > > Morales
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The removal of the SolrWrapper is a
> must.
> > > It
> > > > > was
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > requirement
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > internal project which has nothing to
> do
> > > here
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > operation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold, so forcing the users to use
> > Solr
> > > > does
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > fit
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > philosophy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion, at this moment, a
> Stanbol
> > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > big
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency which will not fit almost
> any
> > > use
> > > > > case
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > useful.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should think a way to convert
> Stanbol
> > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Transformation connector without
> assuming
> > > > that
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > > > > output
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be used.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-11-13 11:20 GMT+01:00 Dileepa
> > > Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I have developed a Stanbol connector
> for
> > > > MCF.
> > > > > > You
> > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > check
> > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> github repo here:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It requires the SolrWrapper output
> > > connector
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > indexes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enhanced
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> documents, entities and entityTypes in
> > > > > separate
> > > > > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > > > > cores.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> requires 3 separate solr cores
> > configured
> > > > > with a
> > > > > > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > schema
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> primary documents, entities and
> > > entityTypes
> > > > > > > > > separately.
> > > > > > > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > done
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> our specific use-case.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The SolrWrapper code is here :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/output/mcf-solrwrapperconnector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Perhaps we can discuss and remove the
> > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > connector's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> SolrWrapper and have it working with
> any
> > > > > output
> > > > > > > > > > connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Please note that the Stanbol connector
> > > > > currently
> > > > > > > > has a
> > > > > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UI
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (editSpecification) which I'm working
> on
> > > at
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > moment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > After
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> will update here. And also I will
> > provide
> > > > > > > > > documentations
> > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > configuring
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> the connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:36 PM,
> Antonio
> > > > David
> > > > > > > Pérez
> > > > > > > > > > > Morales
> > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> adperezmorales@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Joshua
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > It is not the list for that, but
> > > Marmotta
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > already
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > integrated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Stanbol. You can take a look at this
> > > issue
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1165
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Anyway, as I said this is not the
> list
> > > for
> > > > > > that,
> > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > > let's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > proper
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > list for these things.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > 2015-07-09 15:29 GMT+02:00 Joshua
> > > Dunham <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > joshua.dunham@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Hey Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > In case you were
> interested, I
> > > > > pinged
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > list a
> > > > > > > > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ago
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for integration tips for Apache
> > > > Marmotta.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I got some great tips on how to do
> > > this
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Marmotta is a drop in replacement
> > for
> > > > > > Clarezza
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > easier
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for you to take this way.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm not a Java programmer but I'm
> > > > bringing
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > development
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > staff at my company for
> assistance.
> > If
> > > > you
> > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approach
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > may gain more traction solving the
> > > same
> > > > > > > > > integration.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm also integrating Marmotta with
> > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > effect
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > except not using the Stanbol API
> for
> > > > data
> > > > > > > import
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > favor
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > -J
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:03 AM,
> > Dileepa
> > > > > > > Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks you for the feedback and
> > > > offering
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Let me get back to you on where
> to
> > > > start
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > > > base.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > As the first step, I would like
> to
> > > > start
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > creating a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > diagram
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > for the connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I will send the diagram for your
> > > > review
> > > > > > > soon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> >
>
Re: ManifoldCF transformation connector for Apache Stanbol
Posted by Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>.
Hi Karl,
I will proceed in the same way than the OpenNLP connector, so as I ask in
the other email, should we do this using Pull request instead of manually
importing the master branch of Dileepa's repo?
Cheers,
Rafa
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:07 PM Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafa,
>
> Any time you are ready, please import this into a branch. I'll need to
> look over licensing and build before committing to trunk.
>
> Thanks!
> Karl
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <dj...@zaizi.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have done the discussed modifications to the Stanbol connector. Now the
> > users can either define dereference fields or define a LDPath program to
> > extract entity properties from Stanbol entities and add them to the
> > document as fields.
> >
> > The latest code is available here for your review:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> >
> > I have also written a blog post on how to configure the connector:
> >
> >
> http://dileepajayakody.blogspot.com/2016/01/enhancing-documents-in-apache.html
> >
> > Looking forward to your comments.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dileepa
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Karl,
> > >
> > > I will import this one, don't worry.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Rafa
> > > El El sáb, 12 dic 2015 a las 20:36, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Karl,
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I will improve the code with Rafa's reviews and then we can
> import
> > > it
> > > > to mcf code base.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Dileepa
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, it seems premature for me to try to import this from Github
> > today,
> > > so
> > > > > I'll wait until the dust settles a bit further first.
> > > > >
> > > > > Karl
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks a lot Rafa for pointing that out. big miss as I didn't
> test
> > > the
> > > > > > LDPath configuration part yet. More improvements to be done.
> > > > > > I will do the required mprovements as pointed out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The problem is not in that part on the code, it is rather on
> this
> > > > part:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if (entity != null) { Collection<String> properties = entity.
> > > > > > > getProperties(); for (String property : properties) { String
> > > > > > > targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property); Set<String>
> > > propValues =
> > > > > > > entityPropertyMap.get(targetFieldName); if (propValues ==
> null) {
> > > > > > > propValues = new HashSet<String>(); } Collection<String>
> > > > > > entityPropValues =
> > > > > > > entity.getPropertyValues(property);
> > > > > propValues.addAll(entityPropValues);
> > > > > > > entityPropertyMap.put(targetFieldName, propValues); } }
> > > > > > > You are collecting from the EnhancementStructure response just
> > only
> > > > the
> > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields and LDPath fields are ignored.
> > Also,
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > is a potential bug in that code if there is no dereferencing
> > field
> > > > > > > configured for a certain entity property here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > String targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > targetFieldName would be Null then. Instead of trying to index
> > > every
> > > > > > > property, you should just collect the configured ones by the
> user
> > > (or
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > least, if the user wants all of them, provide a configuration
> > > option
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > that).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anyway, going back to LDPath issue, please take into account
> that
> > > > when
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > define a field you must use a custom Namespace and Prefix for
> > later
> > > > > being
> > > > > > > able to retrieve that property from the entity. If you don't do
> > > that,
> > > > > > > Stanbol will provide a random namespace for that property.
> Check
> > > this
> > > > > > > example from RedLink SDK:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/redlink-gmbh/redlink-java-sdk/blob/master/src/test/java/io/redlink/sdk/AnalysisTest.java#L423-443
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hope that helps
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:57 PM Karl Wright <
> daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The next step would be to pull this code into an svn branch.
> > > This
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > something I can tackled after the 2.3 release candidate is
> put
> > > > > > together.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Rafa,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing my code and for your feedback. Please
> > see
> > > my
> > > > > > > > comments
> > > > > > > > > inline below.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Rafa Haro <
> rharo@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This seems to be going in the right direction clearly now
> > in
> > > my
> > > > > > > > opinion.
> > > > > > > > > > Quick comments after a first review:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > - Rejecting a document because it can't be enhanced is
> > > kind
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > tough.
> > > > > > > > > > You are preventing a document to be finally indexed
> > > because
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > enhancement
> > > > > > > > > > didn't perform correctly, probably it is better just
> to
> > > let
> > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > continue
> > > > > > > > > > the workflow within the system
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Got your point. Will remove that part from the code
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > - As I can deduce for the code, you are correctly
> > > extracting
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields, but you are not
> > processing
> > > > at
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > LDPath results
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm passing the LDPath program as an enhancer parameter
> to
> > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > retrieve the enhancement result according to the LDPath
> > program
> > > > > > (which
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > given as a text string in the connector UI).
> > > > > > > > > If the user has not defined a LDPath program and added
> > > derefence
> > > > > > fields
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the UI instead, then the enhancement request will be built
> > > using
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > dereference fields as enhancer parameters.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If neither a LDPath or dereference fields are given in the
> > > > > > > transformation
> > > > > > > > > UI, then I just call the given enhancement chain without
> any
> > > > other
> > > > > > > > enhancer
> > > > > > > > > paramaters.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please refer below code segment where I do this and let me
> > know
> > > > if
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > needs
> > > > > > > > > more improvements.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > // ldpath program is given priority if it's set
> > > > > > > > > if (ldPath != null)
> > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setLDpathProgram(ldPath).build();
> > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > else if (!derefFields.isEmpty())
> > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setDereferencingFields(
> > > > > > > > > derefFields.keySet()).build();
> > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).build();
> > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > eRes = enhancerClient.enhance(parameters);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > Rafa
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:05 PM Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > As per our discussion I have modified the Stanbol
> > Connector
> > > > so
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > adds
> > > > > > > > > > > all extracted entity URIs and entity attributes to the
> > > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > > as fields.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On a separate branch I have committed this code to our
> > > github
> > > > > > > project
> > > > > > > > > > > sensefy-connectors.
> > > > > > > > > > > You can find the source code here:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > > > > > > > > > > Let me know your feedback.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I will write a blog post on how to add it in a
> connection
> > > and
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > ehancement results and share it with you.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You cannot create sub-documents in a transformation
> > > > > connector.
> > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > > > > > adding
> > > > > > > > > > > > that capability to the framework is not possible; we
> > > would
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > missing
> > > > > > > > > > key
> > > > > > > > > > > > bookkeeping logic if that was allowed.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Karl,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the pointer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol doesn't update an existing document, it
> > > > generates a
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > response
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with requested enhancement details for the content
> > > > > enhansment
> > > > > > > > > > request.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > For example for a request like : "Paris is a city
> in
> > > > > France"
> > > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > > RDF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > response [1] is given by Stanbol.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > In the Stanbol connector, enhancement artifacts
> such
> > as
> > > > > > > > > > TextAnnotations
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and EntityAnnotations are extracted from the RDF
> > > > response,
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > entity abstractions and add them to the mcf
> > repository
> > > > > > > document.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Currently
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in the Stanbol connector we have added these entity
> > > > > > > abstractions
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > JSON
> > > > > > > > > > > > > strings to a multi-valued 'entities' field in the
> > > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > we parse that JSON in the SolrWrapper output
> > connector
> > > to
> > > > > > index
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > separate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Solr cores (primary documents, linked entities and
> > > entity
> > > > > > types
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > > attributes).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we can have a primary repository document and
> > > create
> > > > > sub
> > > > > > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the extracted entities? Is it possible to generate
> > sub
> > > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > repo-document in a transformation connector?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] Sample Stanbol response
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont": "http://dbpedia.org/ontology/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:dateTime"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer": "
> > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/
> > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:double"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub": "
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > http://stanbol.apache.org/ontology/entityhub/entityhub#
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl": "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
> ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema": "http://schema.org/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@graph": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/France",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg
> > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg/200px-Flag_of_France.svg.png
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France, officially the French
> > > > Republic,
> > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unitary semi-presidential republic in Western
> Europe
> > > with
> > > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > > > > > > overseas territories and islands located on other
> > > > > continents
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic oceans.
> > Metropolitan
> > > > > France
> > > > > > > > > extends
> > > > > > > > > > > > > from the Mediterranean Sea to the English Channel
> and
> > > the
> > > > > > North
> > > > > > > > > Sea,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and from the Rhine to the Atlantic Ocean. It is
> often
> > > > > > referred
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > l’Hexagone because of the geometric shape of its
> > > > > territory."
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Settlement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg/200px-Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:lat": 48.8567,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:long": 2.3508,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is the capital and largest
> > > city
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > France.
> > > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is situated on the river Seine, in northern France,
> > at
> > > > the
> > > > > > > heart
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Île-de-France region (or Paris Region, French:
> > > Région
> > > > > > > > > > parisienne).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > As of January 2008 the city of Paris, within its
> > > > > > administrative
> > > > > > > > > > limits
> > > > > > > > > > > > > largely unchanged since 1860, has an estimated
> > > population
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > 2,211,297
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and a metropolitan population of 12,089,098, and is
> > one
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > most
> > > > > > > > > > > > > populated metropolitan areas in Europe."
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.6017613,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 5,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 0
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-b2855552-0e46-62f5-cd33-9f84ab32e547",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 1.0,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/France
> > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-c50474e4-ea0e-03ff-5db5-a25f4c8dae45",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.25715446,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Vichy France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vichy_France",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-de07bc41-e4a1-f510-3f93-99ebfd8c39f4",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.1493264,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris Commune"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris_Commune",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.99354976,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 18,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 12
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Repository connectors have an abstraction that
> > allows
> > > > > them
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > compound documents (where a document has a
> primary
> > > > > > > identifier,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are subdocuments that share that primary
> identifier
> > > and
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > secondary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > identifier). This sounds a bit like what you are
> > > > > > describing.
> > > > > > > > > Does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > work by decorating an existing document, or does
> it
> > > > work
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > generating
> > > > > > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > content for a document?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Dileepa Jayakody
> <
> > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While thanking you all for your input on
> Stanbol
> > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > requirement, I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would like to continue with modifying the
> Stanbol
> > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compatible with any output connector. If you
> guys
> > > can
> > > > > > give
> > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > guidance
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how the entity metadata should be added to the
> > > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > modify the stanbol connector accordingly.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From Rafa's comments, I gathered we can add the
> > > > entity
> > > > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo.doc as key value pairs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However this idea is not yet clear to me. There
> > > could
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > 'N'
> > > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entities in a document and each of them will
> have
> > > > some
> > > > > > > common
> > > > > > > > > > > > > attributes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such as name, id, type and specific attributes
> > for
> > > > > > > particular
> > > > > > > > > > > entity
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > type.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not clear on how to maintain that structure
> > of
> > > N
> > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with their attributes in a repo.document as key
> > > value
> > > > > > pairs
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPath compatible for retrieval in an output
> > > > connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Rafa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can please elaborate on your suggestion
> it
> > > > would
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > greatly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > helpful
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All other suggestions are also welcome.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I, too, agree. Somebody will need to turn
> this
> > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > plays by the rules. It may be possible for
> > > someone
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > team
> > > > > > > > > > > > here
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that, but it won't be me; I'm seriously
> > > > overextended
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > moment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be best if someone who knew the
> connector
> > > > well
> > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > work.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Rafa Haro <
> > > > > > > > > > > rharoapache@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I must agree with Antonio. When I started
> to
> > > work
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > > this I
> > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expecting
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the connector to work by just extracting
> the
> > > > > entities
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and put them as plain metadata of the
> > > documents,
> > > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPATH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > queries configuration
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is probably ok for Sensefy but I don’t
> > > think
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suitable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be included in the project. But this is
> > only
> > > > my
> > > > > > > > opinion.
> > > > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > course,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version of the connector that fully respect
> > the
> > > > > > > > ManifoldCF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be more than welcome in my opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Antonio
> > David
> > > > > Pérez
> > > > > > > > > Morales
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The removal of the SolrWrapper is a must.
> > It
> > > > was
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > requirement
> > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > internal project which has nothing to do
> > here
> > > > > with
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > operation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold, so forcing the users to use
> Solr
> > > does
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > fit
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > philosophy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion, at this moment, a Stanbol
> > > > > connector
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > big
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency which will not fit almost any
> > use
> > > > case
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > useful.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should think a way to convert Stanbol
> > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Transformation connector without assuming
> > > that
> > > > a
> > > > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > > > output
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be used.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-11-13 11:20 GMT+01:00 Dileepa
> > Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I have developed a Stanbol connector for
> > > MCF.
> > > > > You
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > check
> > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> github repo here:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It requires the SolrWrapper output
> > connector
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > indexes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > enhanced
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> documents, entities and entityTypes in
> > > > separate
> > > > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > > > cores.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> requires 3 separate solr cores
> configured
> > > > with a
> > > > > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > schema
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> primary documents, entities and
> > entityTypes
> > > > > > > > separately.
> > > > > > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > done
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> our specific use-case.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The SolrWrapper code is here :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/output/mcf-solrwrapperconnector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Perhaps we can discuss and remove the
> > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > connector's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> SolrWrapper and have it working with any
> > > > output
> > > > > > > > > connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Please note that the Stanbol connector
> > > > currently
> > > > > > > has a
> > > > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > UI
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (editSpecification) which I'm working on
> > at
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > moment.
> > > > > > > > > > > After
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> will update here. And also I will
> provide
> > > > > > > > documentations
> > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > configuring
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> the connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Antonio
> > > David
> > > > > > Pérez
> > > > > > > > > > Morales
> > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> adperezmorales@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Joshua
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > It is not the list for that, but
> > Marmotta
> > > is
> > > > > > > already
> > > > > > > > > > > > > integrated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Stanbol. You can take a look at this
> > issue
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1165
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Anyway, as I said this is not the list
> > for
> > > > > that,
> > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > let's
> > > > > > > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > proper
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > list for these things.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > 2015-07-09 15:29 GMT+02:00 Joshua
> > Dunham <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > joshua.dunham@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Hey Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > In case you were interested, I
> > > > pinged
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > list a
> > > > > > > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > days
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ago
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for integration tips for Apache
> > > Marmotta.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I got some great tips on how to do
> > this
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > > > > you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Marmotta is a drop in replacement
> for
> > > > > Clarezza
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > easier
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for you to take this way.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm not a Java programmer but I'm
> > > bringing
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > development
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > staff at my company for assistance.
> If
> > > you
> > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approach
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > may gain more traction solving the
> > same
> > > > > > > > integration.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm also integrating Marmotta with
> > > Stanbol
> > > > > so
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > effect
> > > > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > except not using the Stanbol API for
> > > data
> > > > > > import
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > favor
> > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > -J
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:03 AM,
> Dileepa
> > > > > > Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks you for the feedback and
> > > offering
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Let me get back to you on where to
> > > start
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > > base.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > As the first step, I would like to
> > > start
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > creating a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > diagram
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > for the connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I will send the diagram for your
> > > review
> > > > > > soon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
>
Re: ManifoldCF transformation connector for Apache Stanbol
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Rafa,
Any time you are ready, please import this into a branch. I'll need to
look over licensing and build before committing to trunk.
Thanks!
Karl
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <dj...@zaizi.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have done the discussed modifications to the Stanbol connector. Now the
> users can either define dereference fields or define a LDPath program to
> extract entity properties from Stanbol entities and add them to the
> document as fields.
>
> The latest code is available here for your review:
>
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
>
> I have also written a blog post on how to configure the connector:
>
> http://dileepajayakody.blogspot.com/2016/01/enhancing-documents-in-apache.html
>
> Looking forward to your comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Dileepa
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Karl,
> >
> > I will import this one, don't worry.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rafa
> > El El sáb, 12 dic 2015 a las 20:36, Dileepa Jayakody <
> djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Karl,
> > >
> > > Yes, I will improve the code with Rafa's reviews and then we can import
> > it
> > > to mcf code base.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Dileepa
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, it seems premature for me to try to import this from Github
> today,
> > so
> > > > I'll wait until the dust settles a bit further first.
> > > >
> > > > Karl
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> djayakody@zaizi.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks a lot Rafa for pointing that out. big miss as I didn't test
> > the
> > > > > LDPath configuration part yet. More improvements to be done.
> > > > > I will do the required mprovements as pointed out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Dileepa
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The problem is not in that part on the code, it is rather on this
> > > part:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (entity != null) { Collection<String> properties = entity.
> > > > > > getProperties(); for (String property : properties) { String
> > > > > > targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property); Set<String>
> > propValues =
> > > > > > entityPropertyMap.get(targetFieldName); if (propValues == null) {
> > > > > > propValues = new HashSet<String>(); } Collection<String>
> > > > > entityPropValues =
> > > > > > entity.getPropertyValues(property);
> > > > propValues.addAll(entityPropValues);
> > > > > > entityPropertyMap.put(targetFieldName, propValues); } }
> > > > > > You are collecting from the EnhancementStructure response just
> only
> > > the
> > > > > > configured dereferenced fields and LDPath fields are ignored.
> Also,
> > > > there
> > > > > > is a potential bug in that code if there is no dereferencing
> field
> > > > > > configured for a certain entity property here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > String targetFieldName = derefFields.get(property);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > targetFieldName would be Null then. Instead of trying to index
> > every
> > > > > > property, you should just collect the configured ones by the user
> > (or
> > > > at
> > > > > > least, if the user wants all of them, provide a configuration
> > option
> > > > for
> > > > > > that).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway, going back to LDPath issue, please take into account that
> > > when
> > > > > you
> > > > > > define a field you must use a custom Namespace and Prefix for
> later
> > > > being
> > > > > > able to retrieve that property from the entity. If you don't do
> > that,
> > > > > > Stanbol will provide a random namespace for that property. Check
> > this
> > > > > > example from RedLink SDK:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/redlink-gmbh/redlink-java-sdk/blob/master/src/test/java/io/redlink/sdk/AnalysisTest.java#L423-443
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hope that helps
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:57 PM Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The next step would be to pull this code into an svn branch.
> > This
> > > is
> > > > > > > something I can tackled after the 2.3 release candidate is put
> > > > > together.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Rafa,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing my code and for your feedback. Please
> see
> > my
> > > > > > > comments
> > > > > > > > inline below.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Rafa Haro <rharo@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This seems to be going in the right direction clearly now
> in
> > my
> > > > > > > opinion.
> > > > > > > > > Quick comments after a first review:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - Rejecting a document because it can't be enhanced is
> > kind
> > > of
> > > > > > > tough.
> > > > > > > > > You are preventing a document to be finally indexed
> > because
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > enhancement
> > > > > > > > > didn't perform correctly, probably it is better just to
> > let
> > > > them
> > > > > > > > > continue
> > > > > > > > > the workflow within the system
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Got your point. Will remove that part from the code
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - As I can deduce for the code, you are correctly
> > extracting
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > configured dereferenced fields, but you are not
> processing
> > > at
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > LDPath results
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm passing the LDPath program as an enhancer parameter to
> > > > Stanbol
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > retrieve the enhancement result according to the LDPath
> program
> > > > > (which
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > given as a text string in the connector UI).
> > > > > > > > If the user has not defined a LDPath program and added
> > derefence
> > > > > fields
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the UI instead, then the enhancement request will be built
> > using
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > dereference fields as enhancer parameters.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If neither a LDPath or dereference fields are given in the
> > > > > > transformation
> > > > > > > > UI, then I just call the given enhancement chain without any
> > > other
> > > > > > > enhancer
> > > > > > > > paramaters.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please refer below code segment where I do this and let me
> know
> > > if
> > > > it
> > > > > > > needs
> > > > > > > > more improvements.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > // ldpath program is given priority if it's set
> > > > > > > > if (ldPath != null)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setLDpathProgram(ldPath).build();
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > else if (!derefFields.isEmpty())
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).setDereferencingFields(
> > > > > > > > derefFields.keySet()).build();
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > parameters =
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > EnhancerParameters.builder().setChain(chain).setContent(content).build();
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > eRes = enhancerClient.enhance(parameters);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > Rafa
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:05 PM Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As per our discussion I have modified the Stanbol
> Connector
> > > so
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > adds
> > > > > > > > > > all extracted entity URIs and entity attributes to the
> > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > as fields.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On a separate branch I have committed this code to our
> > github
> > > > > > project
> > > > > > > > > > sensefy-connectors.
> > > > > > > > > > You can find the source code here:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/feature/SENSEFY-1453-modify-stanbol-connector/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > > > > > > > > > Let me know your feedback.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I will write a blog post on how to add it in a connection
> > and
> > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > ehancement results and share it with you.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You cannot create sub-documents in a transformation
> > > > connector.
> > > > > > And
> > > > > > > > > > adding
> > > > > > > > > > > that capability to the framework is not possible; we
> > would
> > > be
> > > > > > > missing
> > > > > > > > > key
> > > > > > > > > > > bookkeeping logic if that was allowed.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Karl,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the pointer.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol doesn't update an existing document, it
> > > generates a
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > response
> > > > > > > > > > > > with requested enhancement details for the content
> > > > enhansment
> > > > > > > > > request.
> > > > > > > > > > > > For example for a request like : "Paris is a city in
> > > > France"
> > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > RDF
> > > > > > > > > > > > response [1] is given by Stanbol.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > In the Stanbol connector, enhancement artifacts such
> as
> > > > > > > > > TextAnnotations
> > > > > > > > > > > > and EntityAnnotations are extracted from the RDF
> > > response,
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > entity abstractions and add them to the mcf
> repository
> > > > > > document.
> > > > > > > > > > > Currently
> > > > > > > > > > > > in the Stanbol connector we have added these entity
> > > > > > abstractions
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > JSON
> > > > > > > > > > > > strings to a multi-valued 'entities' field in the
> > > > repository
> > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > we parse that JSON in the SolrWrapper output
> connector
> > to
> > > > > index
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > separate
> > > > > > > > > > > > Solr cores (primary documents, linked entities and
> > entity
> > > > > types
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > attributes).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Can we can have a primary repository document and
> > create
> > > > sub
> > > > > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > the extracted entities? Is it possible to generate
> sub
> > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > repo-document in a transformation connector?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > [1] Sample Stanbol response
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont": "http://dbpedia.org/ontology/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:dateTime"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer": "
> http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/
> > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:double"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "xsd:int"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub": "
> > > > > > > > > > >
> http://stanbol.apache.org/ontology/entityhub/entityhub#
> > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": "@id"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "owl": "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema": "http://schema.org/",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@graph": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/France",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg
> > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/Flag_of_France.svg/200px-Flag_of_France.svg.png
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France, officially the French
> > > Republic,
> > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > unitary semi-presidential republic in Western Europe
> > with
> > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > > > > > overseas territories and islands located on other
> > > > continents
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic oceans.
> Metropolitan
> > > > France
> > > > > > > > extends
> > > > > > > > > > > > from the Mediterranean Sea to the English Channel and
> > the
> > > > > North
> > > > > > > > Sea,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and from the Rhine to the Atlantic Ocean. It is often
> > > > > referred
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > l’Hexagone because of the geometric shape of its
> > > > territory."
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@id": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Settlement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "foaf:depiction": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> > > > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg/200px-Paris_-_Eiffelturm_und_Marsfeld2.jpg
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:lat": 48.8567,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "geo:long": 2.3508,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:comment": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is the capital and largest
> > city
> > > of
> > > > > > > France.
> > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > is situated on the river Seine, in northern France,
> at
> > > the
> > > > > > heart
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Île-de-France region (or Paris Region, French:
> > Région
> > > > > > > > > parisienne).
> > > > > > > > > > > > As of January 2008 the city of Paris, within its
> > > > > administrative
> > > > > > > > > limits
> > > > > > > > > > > > largely unchanged since 1860, has an estimated
> > population
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > > 2,211,297
> > > > > > > > > > > > and a metropolitan population of 12,089,098, and is
> one
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > most
> > > > > > > > > > > > populated metropolitan areas in Europe."
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "rdfs:label": [
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "fr",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.6017613,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 5,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 0
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-b2855552-0e46-62f5-cd33-9f84ab32e547",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 1.0,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/France
> > > > > > > > > > ",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-c50474e4-ea0e-03ff-5db5-a25f4c8dae45",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.25715446,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Vichy France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vichy_France",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "http://www.opengis.net/gml/_Feature",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-de07bc41-e4a1-f510-3f93-99ebfd8c39f4",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:EntityAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.748Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitytagging.impl.NamedEntityTaggingEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:relation":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> "urn:enhancement-8db13707-1ecd-b4df-90ad-52447c8f2c84",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.1493264,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-label": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris Commune"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-reference": "
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris_Commune",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:entity-type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dbp-ont:PopulatedPlace",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Country",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "schema:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "owl:Thing"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "entityhub:site": "dbpedia"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@id":
> > > > > > > > "urn:enhancement-e9c9c187-2d69-2c1f-6552-e76111430d4a",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@type": [
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:Enhancement",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:TextAnnotation"
> > > > > > > > > > > > ],
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:created": "2015-12-07T11:22:07.740Z",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:creator":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.opennlp.impl.NamedEntityExtractionEnhancementEngine",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "dc:type": "dbp-ont:Place",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:confidence": 0.99354976,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:end": 18,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:extracted-from":
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > "urn:content-item-sha1-c8ae372ed26679df14da13050dd432fd32c527e3",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selected-text": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:selection-context": {
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@language": "en",
> > > > > > > > > > > > "@value": "Paris is in France"
> > > > > > > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > > > > > > "enhancer:start": 12
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Repository connectors have an abstraction that
> allows
> > > > them
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > compound documents (where a document has a primary
> > > > > > identifier,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > are subdocuments that share that primary identifier
> > and
> > > > > have
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > secondary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > identifier). This sounds a bit like what you are
> > > > > describing.
> > > > > > > > Does
> > > > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > > > > work by decorating an existing document, or does it
> > > work
> > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > generating
> > > > > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > content for a document?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Dileepa Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > While thanking you all for your input on Stanbol
> > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > requirement, I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > would like to continue with modifying the Stanbol
> > > > > connector
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > compatible with any output connector. If you guys
> > can
> > > > > give
> > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > > guidance
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > how the entity metadata should be added to the
> > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > modify the stanbol connector accordingly.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > From Rafa's comments, I gathered we can add the
> > > entity
> > > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo.doc as key value pairs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > However this idea is not yet clear to me. There
> > could
> > > > be
> > > > > > 'N'
> > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > entities in a document and each of them will have
> > > some
> > > > > > common
> > > > > > > > > > > > attributes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > such as name, id, type and specific attributes
> for
> > > > > > particular
> > > > > > > > > > entity
> > > > > > > > > > > > > type.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not clear on how to maintain that structure
> of
> > N
> > > > > number
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with their attributes in a repo.document as key
> > value
> > > > > pairs
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPath compatible for retrieval in an output
> > > connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Rafa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can please elaborate on your suggestion it
> > > would
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > greatly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > helpful
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > All other suggestions are also welcome.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Karl Wright <
> > > > > > > > daddywri@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I, too, agree. Somebody will need to turn this
> > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > plays by the rules. It may be possible for
> > someone
> > > > on
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > team
> > > > > > > > > > > here
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that, but it won't be me; I'm seriously
> > > overextended
> > > > at
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > moment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be best if someone who knew the connector
> > > well
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > work.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karl
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Rafa Haro <
> > > > > > > > > > rharoapache@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I must agree with Antonio. When I started to
> > work
> > > > on
> > > > > > > this I
> > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > expecting
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the connector to work by just extracting the
> > > > entities
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > entities
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and put them as plain metadata of the
> > documents,
> > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDPATH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > queries configuration
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is probably ok for Sensefy but I don’t
> > think
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > suitable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be included in the project. But this is
> only
> > > my
> > > > > > > opinion.
> > > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > course,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version of the connector that fully respect
> the
> > > > > > > ManifoldCF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be more than welcome in my opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Antonio
> David
> > > > Pérez
> > > > > > > > Morales
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The removal of the SolrWrapper is a must.
> It
> > > was
> > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > requirement
> > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > internal project which has nothing to do
> here
> > > > with
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > operation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold, so forcing the users to use Solr
> > does
> > > > not
> > > > > > fit
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifold
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > philosophy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion, at this moment, a Stanbol
> > > > connector
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > big
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency which will not fit almost any
> use
> > > case
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > useful.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should think a way to convert Stanbol
> > > > connector
> > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Transformation connector without assuming
> > that
> > > a
> > > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > > output
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be used.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-11-13 11:20 GMT+01:00 Dileepa
> Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I have developed a Stanbol connector for
> > MCF.
> > > > You
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > check
> > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> github repo here:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/transformation/mcf-stanbol-connector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It requires the SolrWrapper output
> connector
> > > > which
> > > > > > > > indexes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > enhanced
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> documents, entities and entityTypes in
> > > separate
> > > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > > cores.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> requires 3 separate solr cores configured
> > > with a
> > > > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > schema
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> primary documents, entities and
> entityTypes
> > > > > > > separately.
> > > > > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > done
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> our specific use-case.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The SolrWrapper code is here :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zaizi/sensefy-connectors/tree/master/output/mcf-solrwrapperconnector
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Perhaps we can discuss and remove the
> > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > connector's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> SolrWrapper and have it working with any
> > > output
> > > > > > > > connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Please note that the Stanbol connector
> > > currently
> > > > > > has a
> > > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > UI
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (editSpecification) which I'm working on
> at
> > > the
> > > > > > > moment.
> > > > > > > > > > After
> > > > > > > > > > > > > fixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> will update here. And also I will provide
> > > > > > > documentations
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > configuring
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> the connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Antonio
> > David
> > > > > Pérez
> > > > > > > > > Morales
> > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> adperezmorales@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Joshua
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > It is not the list for that, but
> Marmotta
> > is
> > > > > > already
> > > > > > > > > > > > integrated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Stanbol. You can take a look at this
> issue
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1165
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Anyway, as I said this is not the list
> for
> > > > that,
> > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > let's
> > > > > > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > proper
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > list for these things.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > 2015-07-09 15:29 GMT+02:00 Joshua
> Dunham <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > joshua.dunham@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Hey Dileepa,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > In case you were interested, I
> > > pinged
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > list a
> > > > > > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > > > > days
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ago
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for integration tips for Apache
> > Marmotta.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I got some great tips on how to do
> this
> > > > which
> > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > > > you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Marmotta is a drop in replacement for
> > > > Clarezza
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > Stanbol
> > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > easier
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > for you to take this way.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm not a Java programmer but I'm
> > bringing
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > development
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > staff at my company for assistance. If
> > you
> > > > > like
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approach
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > may gain more traction solving the
> same
> > > > > > > integration.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm also integrating Marmotta with
> > Stanbol
> > > > so
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > effect
> > > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > except not using the Stanbol API for
> > data
> > > > > import
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > favor
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marmotta.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > -J
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:03 AM, Dileepa
> > > > > Jayakody <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > djayakody@zaizi.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks you for the feedback and
> > offering
> > > > > your
> > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Let me get back to you on where to
> > start
> > > > the
> > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > base.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > As the first step, I would like to
> > start
> > > > by
> > > > > > > > > creating a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architecture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > diagram
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > for the connector.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I will send the diagram for your
> > review
> > > > > soon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Dileepa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > This message should be regarded as
> > > > > > confidential.
> > > > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > email in error please notify the
> > sender
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > destroy
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Statements of intent shall only
> become
> > > > > binding
> > > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > > > > > confirmed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England
> and
> > > > Wales
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is
> > Brook
> > > > > House,
> > > > > > > 229
> > > > > > > > > > > > Shepherds
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Road,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> This message should be regarded as
> > > confidential.
> > > > > If
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> email in error please notify the sender
> and
> > > > > destroy
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Statements of intent shall only become
> > binding
> > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > > confirmed
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and
> Wales
> > > > with
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook
> > House,
> > > > 229
> > > > > > > > > Shepherds
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential.
> If
> > > you
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > email in error please notify the sender and
> destroy
> > > it
> > > > > > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding
> when
> > > > > > confirmed
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with
> > the
> > > > > > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House,
> 229
> > > > > > Shepherds
> > > > > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If
> you
> > > > have
> > > > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy
> it
> > > > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when
> > > > confirmed
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the
> > > > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229
> > > > Shepherds
> > > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you
> > have
> > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it
> > > > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when
> > confirmed
> > > > in
> > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the
> > > > > registration
> > > > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229
> > Shepherds
> > > > Bush
> > > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have
> > > > received
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it
> > > immediately.
> > > > > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed
> > in
> > > > hard
> > > > > > > copy
> > > > > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the
> > > registration
> > > > > > number
> > > > > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds
> > Bush
> > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have
> received
> > > > this
> > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in
> hard
> > > > copy
> > > > > by an authorised signatory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration
> > > number
> > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush
> > Road,
> > > > > London W6 7AN.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received
> > this
> > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard
> > copy
> > > by an authorised signatory.
> > >
> > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration
> number
> > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
> > > London W6 7AN.
> > >
> >
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
> by an authorised signatory.
>
> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
> London W6 7AN.
>