You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/08/12 11:30:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (CAMEL-15386) Camel-Opentelemetry and Camel-opentracing: Semantic conventions are going to diverge

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-15386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-15386.
---------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 3.x)
                   3.5.0
       Resolution: Fixed

> Camel-Opentelemetry and Camel-opentracing: Semantic conventions are going to diverge
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-15386
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-15386
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: camel-opentelemetry, camel-opentracing
>            Reporter: Andrea Cosentino
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.5.0
>
>
> I was trying to update to opentelemetry 0.7 and noticed some breaking changes. It seems the semantic conventions are going change between opentracing and opentelemetry
> [https://github.com/opentracing/specification/blob/1.1/semantic_conventions.md]
> [https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/master/specification/trace/semantic_conventions/database.md#notes-and-well-known-identifiers-for-dbsystem]
> The problem we have is the fact that we are sharing stuff between opentracing and opentelemetry through the camel-tracing component and since they removed the DB_TYPE and DB_INSTANCE, we need to find a different way or a workaround
> [https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java/commit/8525405239173cb8cb6eb4e72cc421b37a8ab2fb]
> [~rubensvp]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)