You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by wo...@pta.de on 2007/10/11 14:56:37 UTC
[Trinidad] tr:panelPopup broken in Trinidad 1.2.2 with FF 2.x ?
Hi,
For your information, as I am not sure wether this is a known problem
or just a configuration issue on my side.
I tried a simple popup such as
<tr:panelPopup text="Auftragsselektion!" title="Gefundene Auftraege"
alignment="center" modal="true">
<tr:outputText value="Do you want to finish?" />
<trh:rowLayout>
<
tr:commandButton accessKey="1" text="1:Cancel"
action="fXAbbrechen"/>
<
tr:commandButton accessKey="2" text="2:Ok"
action="f1Change"/>
</trh:rowLayout>
</tr:panelPopup>
However, this only works in IE 7 but not in FF 2.x. In FF the behaviour is
strangely buggy: the mouse pointer
switches to a "prohibited" symbol and everything is disabled apart from
FF's close button. BTW there is no
Javascript error.
Any ideas regarding this behaviour?
Thanks,
Wolfgang.
Re: [Trinidad] tr:panelPopup broken in Trinidad 1.2.2 with FF 2.x ?
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
1.2.3 will have some large position fixes. 1.0.3 already has them.
On 10/11/07, wolfgang.toepfer@pta.de <wo...@pta.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For your information, as I am not sure wether this is a known problem
> or just a configuration issue on my side.
>
> I tried a simple popup such as
>
> <tr:panelPopup text="Auftragsselektion!" title="Gefundene Auftraege"
> alignment="center" modal="true">
>
> <tr:outputText value="Do you want to finish?" />
>
>
>
> <trh:rowLayout>
>
> <tr:commandButton accessKey="1" text="1:Cancel"
>
> action="fXAbbrechen"/>
>
> <tr:commandButton accessKey="2" text="2:Ok"
>
> action="f1Change"/>
> </trh:rowLayout>
>
> </tr:panelPopup>
>
> However, this only works in IE 7 but not in FF 2.x. In FF the behaviour is
> strangely buggy: the mouse pointer
> switches to a "prohibited" symbol and everything is disabled apart from FF's
> close button. BTW there is no
> Javascript error.
>
> Any ideas regarding this behaviour?
>
> Thanks,
> Wolfgang.
>
>