You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@fineract.apache.org by James Dailey <jd...@apache.org> on 2024/01/05 11:12:08 UTC
[VOTE] Archive CN repos
Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w the
Fineract-CN project?
discussion was held on list in December.
Vote +1 , -1, or 0
Members of PMC indicate as binding
Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
Posted by Javier Borkenztain <ja...@fiter.io>.
+1 binding
[image: Logo] <https://www.fiter.io>
*Javier Borkenztain* *| CEO*
*e:* javier@fiter.io
*w:* fiter.io <http://www.fiter.io>
*m:* +598 97980801
[image: twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/Fiter_io> [image: youtube icon]
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfWztdFtHI3PwaSLAEcwTNQ> [image: linkedin
icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/fiter-io>
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 08:14 James Dailey <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w the
> Fineract-CN project?
> discussion was held on list in December.
>
> Vote +1 , -1, or 0
> Members of PMC indicate as binding
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
Posted by James Dailey <ja...@gmail.com>.
Voting closed after four days. Results:
+1 binding. Five votes. (Petri, James, Aleks, Javier, Bharath)
+1 community. (Honest)
-1 binding. One vote. (Avik)
We have the necessary quorum (six binding votes), the resolution has passed
by more than 2/3rd majority, and I will be informing Infra.
In this case, we are proceeding without unanimous agreement. While this is
not ideal, I thank everyone for giving their opinions honestly.
Hopefully we move forward together.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 10:48 AM Honest Chirozva <ho...@taatconsulting.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> *From: *Avik Ganguly <av...@fynarfin.io>
> *Sent: *Sunday, 07 January 2024 16:05
> *To: *dev@fineract.apache.org
> *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
>
>
>
> -1 binding
>
>
>
> All repos should not be archived (Ex:- accounting, template, provisioner).
> Regression across modules, flaky integration tests, difficult to refactor
> code are consequences of the architecture and current architecture is not a
> long term sustainable solution.
>
>
>
> New modules like overdraft/buy now pay later or scalable
> savings/current/checking accounts should not be built in Fineract just
> because of maturity of reporting module, UI components and other similar
> reasoning.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Dailey <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> (Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <bg...@mifos.org> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <
> cheetah@monkeysintown.com> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w the
> Fineract-CN project?
>
> discussion was held on list in December.
>
>
>
> Vote +1 , -1, or 0
>
> Members of PMC indicate as binding
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
Posted by Honest Chirozva <ho...@taatconsulting.com>.
+1
From: Avik Ganguly<ma...@fynarfin.io>
Sent: Sunday, 07 January 2024 16:05
To: dev@fineract.apache.org<ma...@fineract.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
-1 binding
All repos should not be archived (Ex:- accounting, template, provisioner). Regression across modules, flaky integration tests, difficult to refactor code are consequences of the architecture and current architecture is not a long term sustainable solution.
New modules like overdraft/buy now pay later or scalable savings/current/checking accounts should not be built in Fineract just because of maturity of reporting module, UI components and other similar reasoning.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Dailey <ja...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1 binding
(Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes)
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <bg...@mifos.org>> wrote:
+1 binding
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid> wrote:
+1 binding
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <ch...@monkeysintown.com>> wrote:
+1 binding
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jd...@apache.org>> wrote:
Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w the Fineract-CN project?
discussion was held on list in December.
Vote +1 , -1, or 0
Members of PMC indicate as binding
Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
Posted by Avik Ganguly <av...@fynarfin.io>.
-1 binding
All repos should not be archived (Ex:- accounting, template, provisioner).
Regression across modules, flaky integration tests, difficult to refactor
code are consequences of the architecture and current architecture is not a
long term sustainable solution.
New modules like overdraft/buy now pay later or scalable
savings/current/checking accounts should not be built in Fineract just
because of maturity of reporting module, UI components and other similar
reasoning.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Dailey <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> (Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes)
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <bg...@mifos.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <
>>> cheetah@monkeysintown.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jd...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w
>>>>> the Fineract-CN project?
>>>>> discussion was held on list in December.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote +1 , -1, or 0
>>>>> Members of PMC indicate as binding
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
Posted by James Dailey <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
(Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes)
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <bg...@mifos.org> wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <
>> cheetah@monkeysintown.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w
>>>> the Fineract-CN project?
>>>> discussion was held on list in December.
>>>>
>>>> Vote +1 , -1, or 0
>>>> Members of PMC indicate as binding
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
Posted by Bharath Gowda <bg...@mifos.org>.
+1 binding
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <
> cheetah@monkeysintown.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w
>>> the Fineract-CN project?
>>> discussion was held on list in December.
>>>
>>> Vote +1 , -1, or 0
>>> Members of PMC indicate as binding
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
Posted by Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.INVALID>.
+1 binding
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <ch...@monkeysintown.com>
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w
>> the Fineract-CN project?
>> discussion was held on list in December.
>>
>> Vote +1 , -1, or 0
>> Members of PMC indicate as binding
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos
Posted by Aleksandar Vidakovic <ch...@monkeysintown.com>.
+1 binding
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w the
> Fineract-CN project?
> discussion was held on list in December.
>
> Vote +1 , -1, or 0
> Members of PMC indicate as binding
>
>
>