You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Ajith Ranabahu <aj...@gmail.com> on 2004/12/15 04:04:10 UTC

[Axis2][OM] change to the OM API

Hi all,
I made some changes to the code to make it more easy-to-use.

OMElement has been added a new method , getPullParser(), that returns
a stax pull parser. the returned one is actually the staxParserWrapper
who knows how to switch between the actual underlying parser and the
Object Model.

To make this approach much safer, I have moved the staxWrapper impl to
the same package as the OMElement implementations and made the
constructor default (package access).

thoughts?

-- 
Ajith Ranabahu

Re: [Axis2][OM] change to the OM API

Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
Very nice .. +1!

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <aj...@gmail.com>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Axis2][OM] change to the OM API


> Hi,
> Yeah, this has the added advantage of not having to know anything
> about the other object such as the builders that need to be provided
> when creating the stax wrapper. Now it is very straight-forward.
> 
> -- 
> Ajith Ranabahu
>

Re: [Axis2][OM] change to the OM API

Posted by Ajith Ranabahu <aj...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Yeah, this has the added advantage of not having to know anything
about the other object such as the builders that need to be provided
when creating the stax wrapper. Now it is very straight-forward.

-- 
Ajith Ranabahu

RE: [Axis2][OM] change to the OM API

Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk>.

Hi Ajith and all!!

>>
>>Hi all,
>>I made some changes to the code to make it more easy-to-use.
>>
>>OMElement has been added a new method , getPullParser(), that returns
>>a stax pull parser. the returned one is actually the staxParserWrapper
>>who knows how to switch between the actual underlying parser and the
>>Object Model.

[Chinthaka] Yeah, this is good Ajith. Earlier we had to give an OMElement to
some other class to get the stax pull parser. I think now we can get a
reference to the pull parser from the Element itself.

Chinthaka

>>
>>To make this approach much safer, I have moved the staxWrapper impl to
>>the same package as the OMElement implementations and made the
>>constructor default (package access).
>>
>>thoughts?
>>
>>--
>>Ajith Ranabahu