You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/09/29 04:40:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCRVLT-172) Introduce Package Persistence Layer

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16185342#comment-16185342 ] 

Tobias Bocanegra edited comment on JCRVLT-172 at 9/29/17 4:39 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

note that a pure package persistence layer was not introduced. the abstraction will go via the registry api.


was (Author: tripod):
note that a pur package persistence layer was not introduced. the abstraction will go via the registry api.

> Introduce Package Persistence Layer
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCRVLT-172
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-172
>             Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Packaging
>            Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>             Fix For: 3.1.42
>
>
> In order to support instance local packages, it should be possible to store the uploaded packages in other persistences than JCR, for example on the filesystem. for this we create a abstract package persistence layer. it would also be possible to merge it with the package registry JCRVLT-170)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)