You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Lucene/Solr QA (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/24 23:59:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-9440) FieldInfo#checkConsistency called twice from Lucene50(60)FieldInfosFormat#read

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17164685#comment-17164685 ] 

Lucene/Solr QA commented on LUCENE-9440:
----------------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m 14s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m 16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  1m 16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} Release audit (RAT) {color} | {color:green}  1m 16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} Check forbidden APIs {color} | {color:green}  1m 16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} Validate source patterns {color} | {color:green}  1m 16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  6m 46s{color} | {color:green} core in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 11m 12s{color} | {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | LUCENE-9440 |
| JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13008365/LUCENE-9440.patch |
| Optional Tests |  compile  javac  unit  ratsources  checkforbiddenapis  validatesourcepatterns  |
| uname | Linux lucene2-us-west.apache.org 4.4.0-170-generic #199-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 14 01:45:04 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | ant |
| Personality | /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-LUCENE-Build/sourcedir/dev-tools/test-patch/lucene-solr-yetus-personality.sh |
| git revision | master / d064260 |
| ant | version: Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.6 compiled on July 20 2018 |
| Default Java | LTS |
|  Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-LUCENE-Build/290/testReport/ |
| modules | C: lucene lucene/core U: lucene |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-LUCENE-Build/290/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> FieldInfo#checkConsistency called twice from Lucene50(60)FieldInfosFormat#read
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9440
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9440
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/index
>    Affects Versions: master (9.0)
>            Reporter: Yauheni Putsykovich
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: LUCENE-9440.patch, LUCENE-9440.patch
>
>
> Reviewing code I noticed that we do call _infos[i].checkConsistency();_ method twice: first time inside the _FiledInfo_'s constructor and a second one just after we've created an object.
> org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene50/Lucene50FieldInfosFormat.java:150
> {code:java}
> infos[i] = new FieldInfo(name, fieldNumber, storeTermVector, omitNorms, storePayloads, indexOptions, docValuesType, dvGen, attributes, 0, 0, 0, false); 
> infos[i].checkConsistency();
> {code}
> _FileInfo_'s constructor(notice the last line)
> {code:java}
> public FieldInfo(String name, int number, boolean storeTermVector, boolean omitNorms, boolean storePayloads,
>                  IndexOptions indexOptions, DocValuesType docValues, long dvGen, Map<String,String> attributes,
>                  int pointDimensionCount, int pointIndexDimensionCount, int pointNumBytes, boolean softDeletesField) {
>   this.name = Objects.requireNonNull(name);
>   this.number = number;
>   this.docValuesType = Objects.requireNonNull(docValues, "DocValuesType must not be null (field: \"" + name + "\")");
>   this.indexOptions = Objects.requireNonNull(indexOptions, "IndexOptions must not be null (field: \"" + name + "\")");
>   if (indexOptions != IndexOptions.NONE) {
>     this.storeTermVector = storeTermVector;
>     this.storePayloads = storePayloads;
>     this.omitNorms = omitNorms;
>   } else { // for non-indexed fields, leave defaults
>     this.storeTermVector = false;
>     this.storePayloads = false;
>     this.omitNorms = false;
>   }
>   this.dvGen = dvGen;
>   this.attributes = Objects.requireNonNull(attributes);
>   this.pointDimensionCount = pointDimensionCount;
>   this.pointIndexDimensionCount = pointIndexDimensionCount;
>   this.pointNumBytes = pointNumBytes;
>   this.softDeletesField = softDeletesField;
>   assert checkConsistency();
> }
> {code}
>  
> By this patch, I will remove the second call and leave only one in the constructor.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org