You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Benchao Li (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/02/19 12:57:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-5507) HAVING alias fails for mixed usage of alias and aggregate function
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Benchao Li updated CALCITE-5507:
--------------------------------
Summary: HAVING alias fails for mixed usage of alias and aggregate function (was: HAVING alias failed when aggregate function in condition)
> HAVING alias fails for mixed usage of alias and aggregate function
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-5507
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5507
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jiajun Xie
> Assignee: Jiajun Xie
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.34.0
>
> Time Spent: 3.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We know that calcite can support HAVING alias by setting SqlConformanceEnum.LENIENT
> {code:java}
> sql("select count(empno) as e from emp having e > 10")
> .withConformance(lenient).ok(); {code}
> but when I add one aggregate function in HAVING clause, it will fail.
> {code:java}
> sql("select count(empno) as e from emp having ^e^ > 10 and count(empno) > 10 ")
> .withConformance(lenient).fails("Column 'E' not found in any table");
> // I think it should be ok{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)