You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Benchao Li (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/02/19 12:57:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-5507) HAVING alias fails for mixed usage of alias and aggregate function

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Benchao Li updated CALCITE-5507:
--------------------------------
    Summary: HAVING alias fails for mixed usage of alias and aggregate function  (was: HAVING alias failed when aggregate function in condition)

> HAVING alias fails for mixed usage of alias and aggregate function
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-5507
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5507
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jiajun Xie
>            Assignee: Jiajun Xie
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.34.0
>
>          Time Spent: 3.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We know that calcite can support HAVING alias by setting SqlConformanceEnum.LENIENT
> {code:java}
> sql("select count(empno) as e from emp having e > 10")
>     .withConformance(lenient).ok(); {code}
> but when I add one aggregate function in HAVING clause, it will fail.
> {code:java}
> sql("select count(empno) as e from emp having ^e^ > 10 and count(empno) > 10 ")
>     .withConformance(lenient).fails("Column 'E' not found in any table"); 
> // I think it should be ok{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)