You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> on 2017/12/01 10:11:44 UTC
Lucene/Solr 7.2
Hello,
It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated a good
set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0.
There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC:
LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please
let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the
release.
I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of building
the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I meant SOLR-11662 and *not* SOLR-11698. Sorry for any confusion.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:55 AM Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> Did you mean SOLR-11662 rather than SOLR-11698? SOLR-11698 looks like a
> big change that isn't nearly ready yet.
>
>
> Le ven. 1 déc. 2017 à 16:59, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Doug's issue SOLR-11698 needs my final code review (probably final any
>> way) and I plan to commit that as late as Monday if it goes well.
>>
>> Erick... IMO:
>> * LUCENE-8048 probably needs some "bake" time IMO, plus it's not clear if
>> it's committable yet (waiting for other input).
>> * SOLR-11687 definitely include
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:41 AM Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> SOLR-11687 and LUCENE-8048 are ones I'd like to consider getting in to
>>> 7.2, should they have longer to bake though? Any opinions?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > +1. I have a couple of tickets that I should have wrapped up by Monday.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> --
>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
David,
Did you mean SOLR-11662 rather than SOLR-11698? SOLR-11698 looks like a big
change that isn't nearly ready yet.
Le ven. 1 déc. 2017 à 16:59, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Doug's issue SOLR-11698 needs my final code review (probably final any
> way) and I plan to commit that as late as Monday if it goes well.
>
> Erick... IMO:
> * LUCENE-8048 probably needs some "bake" time IMO, plus it's not clear if
> it's committable yet (waiting for other input).
> * SOLR-11687 definitely include
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:41 AM Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> SOLR-11687 and LUCENE-8048 are ones I'd like to consider getting in to
>> 7.2, should they have longer to bake though? Any opinions?
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > +1. I have a couple of tickets that I should have wrapped up by Monday.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
David:
Well, I can make LUCENE-8048 committable in about 30 seconds ;) On a
more serious note, I've already delayed 2 weeks to give people time to
respond but nobody has. I'll put some time into digging at why the
test failures happened and if they're a test artifact rather than a
fundamental problem I'll be more inclined to push forward on it. We'll
see what I can find in the next day or two.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:59 AM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Doug's issue SOLR-11698 needs my final code review (probably final any way)
> and I plan to commit that as late as Monday if it goes well.
>
> Erick... IMO:
> * LUCENE-8048 probably needs some "bake" time IMO, plus it's not clear if
> it's committable yet (waiting for other input).
> * SOLR-11687 definitely include
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:41 AM Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> SOLR-11687 and LUCENE-8048 are ones I'd like to consider getting in to
>> 7.2, should they have longer to bake though? Any opinions?
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +1. I have a couple of tickets that I should have wrapped up by Monday.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>.
Doug's issue SOLR-11698 needs my final code review (probably final any way)
and I plan to commit that as late as Monday if it goes well.
Erick... IMO:
* LUCENE-8048 probably needs some "bake" time IMO, plus it's not clear if
it's committable yet (waiting for other input).
* SOLR-11687 definitely include
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:41 AM Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> SOLR-11687 and LUCENE-8048 are ones I'd like to consider getting in to
> 7.2, should they have longer to bake though? Any opinions?
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1. I have a couple of tickets that I should have wrapped up by Monday.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
SOLR-11687 and LUCENE-8048 are ones I'd like to consider getting in to
7.2, should they have longer to bake though? Any opinions?
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. I have a couple of tickets that I should have wrapped up by Monday.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1. I have a couple of tickets that I should have wrapped up by Monday.
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
It is not too time-consuming. The whole process takes a lot of time, but
most of the time is actually spent waiting (for other people to vote, that
javadocs upload, that mirrors replicate, etc.). You can have a look at
https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo to see what kind of things
need to be done as part of the release process. If you'd like to give it a
try but you're not sure how much time you can allocate to it, it might be
easier to start with a bugfix release, which usually has fewer chances of
being respun since the set of chances is usually more contained.
Le ven. 1 déc. 2017 à 15:48, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Adrien,
>
> Thanks for doing this release. Just curious, how much time would you
> estimate is involved in being the RM? I've never done it before. I'm not
> offering to take over this release but maybe I'll do a future one.
>
> ~ David
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:11 AM Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated a
>> good set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0.
>>
>> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC:
>> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please
>> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the
>> release.
>>
>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of building
>> the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>.
Adrien,
Thanks for doing this release. Just curious, how much time would you
estimate is involved in being the RM? I've never done it before. I'm not
offering to take over this release but maybe I'll do a future one.
~ David
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:11 AM Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated a
> good set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0.
>
> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC:
> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please
> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the
> release.
>
> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of building
> the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043
>
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.
There's SOLR-11624 that I want to get in; I'm planning to have it in by
Monday/Tuesday.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated a
> good set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0.
>
> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC:
> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please
> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the
> release.
>
> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of building
> the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043
>