You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by sebb <se...@gmail.com> on 2008/03/31 22:09:49 UTC
Fixes to Abdera SVN properties
Thanks.
There are quite a few problems with the SVN properties; see script at
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/SVNfixes/
(which should work on Unix - and in a DOS box if suitably
named)
These are not critical to the release, but not having them causes
problems when working across systems with different EOLs.
On 31/03/2008, Dan Diephouse <da...@mulesource.com> wrote:
> Oops hit "ctrl enter" instead of "ctrl-v enter". Here's the tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/java/tags/abdera-0.4.0-incubating/
>
>
> Dan
>
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > I removed the empty sources jar and tagged the release:
> >
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>> On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> -1: There are MD5 and SHA1 digests in the directory, but the archives
> >>> have no signatures.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> OK, I will fix this.
> >>>> Maven Repository: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take6/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> -0: The abdera-bundle-0.4.0-incubating-sources.jar does not appear to
> >>> have any content - only the META-INF directory is present. Is that
> >>> correct?
> >>>
> >> This is just a by-product of Maven. We can delete it.
> >>> -1: The NOTICE files in that jar (and others) contains far too much.
> >>> The NOTICE file is for required attribtions ONLY (e.g. as per an
> >>> About box)
> >>> There's really no need to repeat ASF for each project used by Abdera.
> >>>
> >> Having too much information in the NOTICE files is not a crime. The
> >> Maven remote-resources plugin aggregates all this stuff for us so we
> >> never miss any notice that we need to put in.
> >>> -1: The LICENSE files need to either contain copies of the 3rd party
> >>> licenses, or they need to have a reference to the 3rd party licences.
> >>> Equally, there is no need for the lib directory to contain copies of
> >>> the AL for every ASF product.
> >>>
> >> Why does the LICENSE file need to have a copy of all the other
> >> licenses? These are contained in the lib/ directory like many other
> >> ASF projects.
> >>
> >> Re: the ASL license in lib/ - once again having too much information
> >> is not a crime. This is a service to uesrs so they know where the
> >> libraries came from.
> >>> -1: RAT report says:
> >>>
> >>> 99 Unknown Licenses
> >>>
> >>> Some of these are trivial, but most require an AL header.
> >>>
> >> Not true - there is not consensus that properties/xml files need to
> >> have headers. All the Java source code files have headers. If there
> >> are specific files that you feel should have a license that don't
> >> please list them and explain why. I'm not saying that we didn't miss
> >> something, but I am saying that the ones that I know about don't
> >> necessarily require a header.
> >>> What is the SVN tag that corresponds with the archives?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> the branch will be tagged once its released.
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> MuleSource
> http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org