You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2007/12/21 14:20:34 UTC
[Build-Tools] java packages
Hi,
should we always start with this package ?
org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven2
or
org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven
than
-plugin.wagon
-plugin.jdev
-plugin.faces
-plugin.javascript
that would be similar to the maven-plugins, provided by the maven-folks;
not really sure on maven vs maven2
thx!
Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Build-Tools] java packages
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
+0.5 on maven
I am a bit indifferent, but I think that a package should be version
agnostic, and only be used for area of functionality. The JAR should
be version specific.
Don't you think that it would be invalid to import maven1 and maven2
jars at the same time?
So I would see as the package:
org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven
And the release as something like:
apache-myfaces-maven1-1.x.x with dependency on maven 1 and
apache-myfaces-maven2-1.x.x with dependency on maven 2 and
apache-myfaces-maven3-1.x.x with dependency on maven 3.
So the artifact ID would have the maven version somewhere in it.
-Andrew
On Dec 21, 2007 6:48 AM, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> maven2 is ok I think
>
> at least it makes sure we have a namespace for incompatible maven3
> plugins in the future... ;-)
>
> --Manfred
>
>
>
> On 12/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > should we always start with this package ?
> >
> > org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven2
> >
> > or
> >
> > org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven
> >
> > than
> >
> > -plugin.wagon
> > -plugin.jdev
> > -plugin.faces
> > -plugin.javascript
> >
> > that would be similar to the maven-plugins, provided by the maven-folks;
> >
> > not really sure on maven vs maven2
> >
> > thx!
> > Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.irian.at
> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
> Development and Courses in English and
> German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: [Build-Tools] java packages
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
maven2 is ok I think
at least it makes sure we have a namespace for incompatible maven3
plugins in the future... ;-)
--Manfred
On 12/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> should we always start with this package ?
>
> org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven2
>
> or
>
> org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven
>
> than
>
> -plugin.wagon
> -plugin.jdev
> -plugin.faces
> -plugin.javascript
>
> that would be similar to the maven-plugins, provided by the maven-folks;
>
> not really sure on maven vs maven2
>
> thx!
> Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
Development and Courses in English and
German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces