Re: Tagging CVS for tdk-1.1a12

[Santiago Gala <sg...@hisitech.com>]

Jon Stevens wrote:

> on 3/28/01 3:42 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <jv...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> I can probably do that tomorrow night, I'll
>> just replace what's there.
> 
> 
> Please No! It must be a new version.
> 
> I don't care if we get to 1.1a1000.
> 

Yes +1024 here.

I remember fighting with a problem for days (I don't remember if it was 
JBuilder or a Windows DLL) only to find that this component had exactly 
the same name, the same internal version info (including i18n), but I 
had two versions, in two different machines, with different size, one 
working and one not.

They had updated something without tagging it properly. This is a real 
mess for maintenance.

BTW, I will try to update Jetspeed before leaving for the New World :)
Also, I'm thinking about having a Jetspeed 1.3a2, so that we have less 
but reports from new users downloading 1.3a1.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org