You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@spamassassin.apache.org by jh...@apache.org on 2014/09/08 04:36:11 UTC
svn commit: r1623253 -
/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf
Author: jhardin
Date: Mon Sep 8 02:36:10 2014
New Revision: 1623253
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1623253
Log:
FP avoidance tuning
Modified:
spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf
Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf?rev=1623253&r1=1623252&r2=1623253&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf (original)
+++ spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf Mon Sep 8 02:36:10 2014
@@ -285,9 +285,10 @@ describe __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN To: usernam
# let's see if we can get those low-scored spams some more points
# FP observation: __TO_EQ_FROM overlaps ~60% of _USER_NN ham hits;
# this suggests the primary spam indicator is having *different* suffixes
-# Most of the rest are fairly reliable ham indicators
+# Unfortunately the spam % for that can hit 10%
+# Many of the rest are fairly reliable ham indicators
# suggested scored FP avoidance rule:
-meta __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN_MINFP __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN && !__TO_EQ_FROM && !__LCL__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH && !__DKIM_EXISTS && !__NOT_SPOOFED
+meta __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN_MINFP __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN && !__TO_EQ_FROM && !__LCL__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH && !__DKIM_EXISTS && !__NOT_SPOOFED && !__RCD_RDNS_SMTP && !__RCD_RDNS_MX_MESSY && !__THREADED
header __SUBJ_NOT_SHORT Subject =~ /^.{16}/