You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by jostbg <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/01/23 09:09:55 UTC

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID ...

GitHub user jostbg opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806

    [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before executing ...

    connection#validateUser

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jostbg/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-1629

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1806
    
----
commit 7b92bbef1c708671a87cc97ec6501f8b72d6601c
Author: Johan Stenberg <35...@...>
Date:   2018-01-23T09:09:02Z

    [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before executing connection#validateUser

----


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before ...

Posted by jostbg <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jostbg commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806
  
    @jbertram Ok, done.


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before ...

Posted by jbertram <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806
  
    @jostbg, that's what I was looking for.  Although I would expect the commits to be squashed together.


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before ...

Posted by michaelandrepearce <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806
  
    @jostbg thanks for the test :) +1.


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before ...

Posted by michaelandrepearce <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806
  
    Can there be a test case to a) show why this needs to be changed, b) avoid any future regression.


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID ...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before ...

Posted by jbertram <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806
  
    @jostbg, you can extend StompTestBase and override the createServer() method.  Look at the implementation of createServer() in StompTestBase to get an idea how to create/configure the server.  The method `org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.ActiveMQServers#newActiveMQServer(org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.config.Configuration, javax.management.MBeanServer, org.apache.activemq.artemis.spi.core.security.ActiveMQSecurityManager, boolean)` will likely come in handy for you when creating your server.


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before ...

Posted by jostbg <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jostbg commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806
  
    @michaelandrepearce @jbertram  I added a test case to the JIRA that outlines the issue but I have no idea how to get it into the same form that is used in the stomp test cases in the integration-tests project. There seems to obvious way how to use a different SecurityManager when extending StompTestBase class.


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #1806: [ARTEMIS-1629] Set connection.clientID before ...

Posted by jostbg <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jostbg commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1806
  
    @michaelandrepearce @jbertram Is that kind of test what you are having in mind?


---