You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geode.apache.org by Jason Huynh <hu...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/08 20:37:42 UTC

Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.


Repository: geode


Description
-------

Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...


Diffs
-----

  geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Jason Huynh


Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Barry Oglesby <bo...@pivotal.io>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/#review127870
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Barry Oglesby


On April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>


Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Nabarun Nag <nn...@pivotal.io>.
As per Jason's advice I will open a new ticket for rewriting the test case
design as tests are not suppose to wait for 4 min.
Also, while running all the WAN tests on IntelliJ I was able to find more
tests with timing issue which Jason and me solved earlier. (Running two
IntelliJ instances simultaneously )
Will create the ticket and push in the changes.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:45 PM Barry Oglesby <bo...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
>
> Ship it!
>
> Ship It!
>
>
> - Barry Oglesby
>
> On April 8th, 2016, 8:26 p.m. UTC, Jason Huynh wrote:
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag,
> Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> By Jason Huynh.
>
> *Updated April 8, 2016, 8:26 p.m.*
> *Repository: * geode
> Description
>
> Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...
>
> Diffs
>
>    - geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java
>    (130f960)
>
> View Diff <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/>
>

Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Barry Oglesby <bo...@pivotal.io>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/#review127879
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Barry Oglesby


On April 8, 2016, 8:26 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2016, 8:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>


Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Jason Huynh <hu...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated April 8, 2016, 8:26 p.m.)


Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.


Changes
-------

Updated diff to add a new method signature.  Any tests that are failing due to the defaulted 30 seconds can now be changed on a per test basis to wait for however long the test thinks it needs.


Repository: geode


Description
-------

Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...


Diffs (updated)
-----

  geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Jason Huynh


Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Jason Huynh <hu...@gmail.com>.

> On April 8, 2016, 8:02 p.m., Barry Oglesby wrote:
> > Maybe that timeout should be configurable? Most times 4 minutes might as well be forever.

Yes, that would be a good idea.  I'm trying to revert this one change in the big refactoring I did earlier for GEODE-1062.  I didn't think anything would need to wait 4 minutes but Naba found a test that fails for him on his machine.  Most of the properly passing tests will actually complete before the 4 minutes due to this being a wait criterion.


- Jason


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/#review127865
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>


Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Jason Huynh <hu...@gmail.com>.

> On April 8, 2016, 8:02 p.m., Barry Oglesby wrote:
> > Maybe that timeout should be configurable? Most times 4 minutes might as well be forever.
> 
> Jason Huynh wrote:
>     Yes, that would be a good idea.  I'm trying to revert this one change in the big refactoring I did earlier for GEODE-1062.  I didn't think anything would need to wait 4 minutes but Naba found a test that fails for him on his machine.  Most of the properly passing tests will actually complete before the 4 minutes due to this being a wait criterion.
> 
> Barry Oglesby wrote:
>     Right, but if it isn't a "properly passing test," then you're stuck waiting for 4 minutes for it to fail. I'm sure all our tests will pass from now on, so we don't have to worry about this wait time.

Or maybe I can leave this change at 30 seconds and any test that fails from this can be rewritten to not rely on the full 4 minutes?


- Jason


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/#review127865
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>


Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Barry Oglesby <bo...@pivotal.io>.

> On April 8, 2016, 8:02 p.m., Barry Oglesby wrote:
> > Maybe that timeout should be configurable? Most times 4 minutes might as well be forever.
> 
> Jason Huynh wrote:
>     Yes, that would be a good idea.  I'm trying to revert this one change in the big refactoring I did earlier for GEODE-1062.  I didn't think anything would need to wait 4 minutes but Naba found a test that fails for him on his machine.  Most of the properly passing tests will actually complete before the 4 minutes due to this being a wait criterion.

Right, but if it isn't a "properly passing test," then you're stuck waiting for 4 minutes for it to fail. I'm sure all our tests will pass from now on, so we don't have to worry about this wait time.


- Barry


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/#review127865
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>


Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Barry Oglesby <bo...@pivotal.io>.

> On April 8, 2016, 8:02 p.m., Barry Oglesby wrote:
> > Maybe that timeout should be configurable? Most times 4 minutes might as well be forever.
> 
> Jason Huynh wrote:
>     Yes, that would be a good idea.  I'm trying to revert this one change in the big refactoring I did earlier for GEODE-1062.  I didn't think anything would need to wait 4 minutes but Naba found a test that fails for him on his machine.  Most of the properly passing tests will actually complete before the 4 minutes due to this being a wait criterion.
> 
> Barry Oglesby wrote:
>     Right, but if it isn't a "properly passing test," then you're stuck waiting for 4 minutes for it to fail. I'm sure all our tests will pass from now on, so we don't have to worry about this wait time.
> 
> Jason Huynh wrote:
>     Or maybe I can leave this change at 30 seconds and any test that fails from this can be rewritten to not rely on the full 4 minutes?

Thats a good idea. I guess it depends on why the test needs 4 minutes to validateRegionSize. I wouldn't worry about it too much. Your change is just fine.


- Barry


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/#review127865
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>


Re: Review Request 45938: GEODE-1062: Undoing reduction in wait time

Posted by Barry Oglesby <bo...@pivotal.io>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/#review127865
-----------------------------------------------------------



Maybe that timeout should be configurable? Most times 4 minutes might as well be forever.

- Barry Oglesby


On April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2016, 6:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some tests with overflow require the full 240000 millisecond timeout...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/WANTestBase.java 130f960 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45938/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>