You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by decoder <de...@own-hero.net> on 2006/08/17 17:48:32 UTC
FuzzyOcr mailing list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
because I feel that the spamassassin mailing list shouldn't be
spammed/bothered with further help requests to install FuzzyOcr or to
solve problems with it, I created a mailing list for it (and possibly
other small tools that I write). It will definetly be a low traffic
list (especially when I am studying again and having less time to work
on these things), but I will make regular announcements when new
versions are there without annoying the main mailing list and people
that don't want to know about it ;). It should also serve as a place
to think about new methods/technologies to detect spam (in conjuction
with SA or without it) and so on.
If you are interested, feel free to subscribe at:
http://lists.own-hero.net/mailman/listinfo/devel-spam
Please use this list for all future problems, feature/help requests or
bug reports.
Developers of other plugins can also utilize this list for their
plugins, if they wish :)
Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE5I/PJQIKXnJyDxURAi7dAJ4v9QOxUoJpW0D0QohonH3y4sD3nwCgwaZ8
bmRLdYT2dvygRTQ80jVXtS8=
=U2P7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list
Posted by "Expertsites, Inc." <sp...@expertsites.com>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Allen" <jo...@barumtrading.co.uk>
To: <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list
> Chris wrote:
>> because I feel that the spamassassin mailing list shouldn't be
>> spammed/bothered with further help requests to install FuzzyOcr or to
>> solve problems with it, I created a mailing list for it (and possibly
>> other small tools that I write). It will definetly be a low traffic
>> list (especially when I am studying again and having less time to work
>> on these things), but I will make regular announcements when new
>> versions are there without annoying the main mailing list and people
>> that don't want to know about it ;). It should also serve as a place
>> to think about new methods/technologies to detect spam (in conjuction
>> with SA or without it) and so on.
>
> I am sorry to see this. I don't think the FuzzyOCR traffic was that
> high, but *MOST* of all, if this had been discussed only at the new
> list, I wouldn't have found it and been able to install it.
>
> My vote, for what it's worth, is to keep it all here ...
>
> Jonathan
I agree! Regardless, I did subscribe to the new list.
Tom Green
--
Expertsites, Inc.
Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list
Posted by jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>.
From: "Jonathan Allen" <jo...@barumtrading.co.uk>
> Chris wrote:
>> because I feel that the spamassassin mailing list shouldn't be
>> spammed/bothered with further help requests to install FuzzyOcr or to
>> solve problems with it, I created a mailing list for it (and possibly
>> other small tools that I write). It will definetly be a low traffic
>> list (especially when I am studying again and having less time to work
>> on these things), but I will make regular announcements when new
>> versions are there without annoying the main mailing list and people
>> that don't want to know about it ;). It should also serve as a place
>> to think about new methods/technologies to detect spam (in conjuction
>> with SA or without it) and so on.
>
> I am sorry to see this. I don't think the FuzzyOCR traffic was that
> high, but *MOST* of all, if this had been discussed only at the new
> list, I wouldn't have found it and been able to install it.
>
> My vote, for what it's worth, is to keep it all here ...
I'd vote that way, too. The extra exposure will do it some good.
{^_^}
Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list
Posted by Jonathan Allen <jo...@barumtrading.co.uk>.
Chris,
> I just felt like I am annoying some people here that aren't
> interested in this because more and more people keep writing to the
> mailing list about it with, sometimes, trivial problems or requests,
I have learned several other things in the process, so I felt that the
whole experience had been worthwhile. I certainly wasn't upset about
people askign questions - like I had to do myself some while ago ...
> I thought it might be better to do at least the support stuff
> somewhere else. I can still send an email to the list if there is a
> new version available, if the people here don't mind that...
I'd still keep it all here, myself. You'll still get lots of questions
here anyway, from people who don't know about your list, so I'm not sure
what benefit there will be to moving to a new list.
Sending a new-version message here would be mandatory !
Jonathan
Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list
Posted by decoder <de...@own-hero.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Allen wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>> because I feel that the spamassassin mailing list shouldn't be
>> spammed/bothered with further help requests to install FuzzyOcr
>> or to solve problems with it, I created a mailing list for it
>> (and possibly other small tools that I write). It will definetly
>> be a low traffic list (especially when I am studying again and
>> having less time to work on these things), but I will make
>> regular announcements when new versions are there without
>> annoying the main mailing list and people that don't want to know
>> about it ;). It should also serve as a place to think about new
>> methods/technologies to detect spam (in conjuction with SA or
>> without it) and so on.
>
> I am sorry to see this. I don't think the FuzzyOCR traffic was
> that high, but *MOST* of all, if this had been discussed only at
> the new list, I wouldn't have found it and been able to install it.
>
>
> My vote, for what it's worth, is to keep it all here ...
>
> Jonathan
Well, I just felt like I am annoying some people here that aren't
interested in this because more and more people keep writing to the
mailing list about it with, sometimes, trivial problems or requests,
so I thought it might be better to do at least the support stuff
somewhere else. I can still send an email to the list if there is a
new version available, if the people here don't mind that...
Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE5JnNJQIKXnJyDxURAiSPAJ9ICeA83LrcSGOp1ytAQN5GnqNMywCfZUCV
o9oRdLg8e5pj97e5HdLKmso=
=bWLG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list
Posted by "John D. Hardin" <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Jonathan Allen wrote:
> I am sorry to see this. I don't think the FuzzyOCR traffic was that
> high, but *MOST* of all, if this had been discussed only at the new
> list, I wouldn't have found it and been able to install it.
>
> My vote, for what it's worth, is to keep it all here ...
+1
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently the Bush/Rove idea of being a "fiscal conservative" is
to spend money like there's no tomorrow, run up huge deficits, and
pray the Rapture happens before the bills come due.
-- atul666 in Y! SCOX forum
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: FuzzyOcr mailing list
Posted by Jonathan Allen <jo...@barumtrading.co.uk>.
Chris wrote:
> because I feel that the spamassassin mailing list shouldn't be
> spammed/bothered with further help requests to install FuzzyOcr or to
> solve problems with it, I created a mailing list for it (and possibly
> other small tools that I write). It will definetly be a low traffic
> list (especially when I am studying again and having less time to work
> on these things), but I will make regular announcements when new
> versions are there without annoying the main mailing list and people
> that don't want to know about it ;). It should also serve as a place
> to think about new methods/technologies to detect spam (in conjuction
> with SA or without it) and so on.
I am sorry to see this. I don't think the FuzzyOCR traffic was that
high, but *MOST* of all, if this had been discussed only at the new
list, I wouldn't have found it and been able to install it.
My vote, for what it's worth, is to keep it all here ...
Jonathan