You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@johnzon.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2014/11/10 19:26:45 UTC

support private/protected constructors?

Hi guys,

do we add/want to support private/protected constructors for mapper?
This is the case for jaxb, jackson etc..?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau

Re: support private/protected constructors?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
about fields? should be aligned on current access through methods


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-11-10 20:18 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> what about superclasses?
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> PS: suppose we should think about fields as well
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-10 19:26 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> do we add/want to support private/protected constructors for mapper?
>>> This is the case for jaxb, jackson etc..?
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: support private/protected constructors?

Posted by Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>.
+1

what about superclasses?

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PS: suppose we should think about fields as well
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-11-10 19:26 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> do we add/want to support private/protected constructors for mapper?
>> This is the case for jaxb, jackson etc..?
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau



-- 
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: support private/protected constructors?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
PS: suppose we should think about fields as well


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-11-10 19:26 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> Hi guys,
>
> do we add/want to support private/protected constructors for mapper?
> This is the case for jaxb, jackson etc..?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau