You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by boris <bs...@eunet.yu> on 2006/08/10 18:23:06 UTC
Problem with SA deployment
Hi,
since I compiled the last version of SM-core from SVN, I'm not able to
deploy my Service Asembly any more. The problem:
"The JBI descriptor is not valid, please correct these violations [The jbi
descriptor does not contain any informations]"
With the SM-core version that I've used before, everything was running fine.
The method "checkDescriptor" in class "DescriptorFactory" has some new
features!!! Could you check it?
Many thanks,
boris
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5747645
Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Problem with SA deployment
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Well, I had the same problem after I added the validation checks ;)
On 8/11/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
>
>
> Your guess was OK, Guillaume. Actually, every one of my SU's had a jbi.xml
> with following content;
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <jbi xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jbi" version="1.0">
>
> </jbi>
>
> This is endeed (since latest Version of SM-core) not wanted any more!!
>
> Many thanks,
>
> boris
>
>
>
> gnodet wrote:
> >
> > I think the problem does not come from the SA jbi descriptor, but from
> one
> > of the SU jbi descriptor.
> > ServiceMix does not mandate the existence of the SU jbi.xml, but if
> > present,
> > the descriptor must
> > be valid. For example, an empty descriptor (<jbi />) won't pass the
> > tests.
> >
> > On 8/11/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Sure,
> >>
> >> the jbi.xml follows (it's in META-INF):
> >>
> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >> <jbi xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jbi" version="1.0">
> >>
> >> <service-assembly>
> >> <identification>
> >> <name>test</name>
> >> <description>test</description>
> >> </identification>
> >>
> >> <service-unit>
> >> <identification>
> >> <name>jms</name>
> >> <description>JMS Component</description>
> >> </identification>
> >> <target>
> >> <artifacts-zip>jms-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
> >> <component-name>servicemix-jms</component-name>
> >> </target>
> >> </service-unit>
> >>
> >> <service-unit>
> >> <identification>
> >> <name>test-jsr181</name>
> >> <description>Contains the service</description>
> >> </identification>
> >> <target>
> >> <artifacts-zip>test-jsr181-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
> >> <component-name>servicemix-jsr181</component-name>
> >> </target>
> >> </service-unit>
> >>
> >> <service-unit>
> >> <identification>
> >> <name>test-http</name>
> >> <description>Contains the service</description>
> >> </identification>
> >> <target>
> >> <artifacts-zip>test-http-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
> >> <component-name>servicemix-http</component-name>
> >> </target>
> >> </service-unit>
> >>
> >> </service-assembly>
> >> </jbi>
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >>
> >> boris
> >>
> >>
> >> Philip Dodds-2 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Can you provide a copy of the service assembly jbi.xml that is
> failing?
> >> >
> >> > P
> >> >
> >> > On 8/10/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> since I compiled the last version of SM-core from SVN, I'm not able
> to
> >> >> deploy my Service Asembly any more. The problem:
> >> >>
> >> >> "The JBI descriptor is not valid, please correct these violations
> [The
> >> >> jbi
> >> >> descriptor does not contain any informations]"
> >> >>
> >> >> With the SM-core version that I've used before, everything was
> running
> >> >> fine.
> >> >> The method "checkDescriptor" in class "DescriptorFactory" has some
> new
> >> >> features!!! Could you check it?
> >> >>
> >> >> Many thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> boris
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5747645
> >> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5757649
> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5763560
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Problem with SA deployment
Posted by boris <bs...@eunet.yu>.
Your guess was OK, Guillaume. Actually, every one of my SU's had a jbi.xml
with following content;
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jbi xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jbi" version="1.0">
</jbi>
This is endeed (since latest Version of SM-core) not wanted any more!!
Many thanks,
boris
gnodet wrote:
>
> I think the problem does not come from the SA jbi descriptor, but from one
> of the SU jbi descriptor.
> ServiceMix does not mandate the existence of the SU jbi.xml, but if
> present,
> the descriptor must
> be valid. For example, an empty descriptor (<jbi />) won't pass the
> tests.
>
> On 8/11/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sure,
>>
>> the jbi.xml follows (it's in META-INF):
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <jbi xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jbi" version="1.0">
>>
>> <service-assembly>
>> <identification>
>> <name>test</name>
>> <description>test</description>
>> </identification>
>>
>> <service-unit>
>> <identification>
>> <name>jms</name>
>> <description>JMS Component</description>
>> </identification>
>> <target>
>> <artifacts-zip>jms-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
>> <component-name>servicemix-jms</component-name>
>> </target>
>> </service-unit>
>>
>> <service-unit>
>> <identification>
>> <name>test-jsr181</name>
>> <description>Contains the service</description>
>> </identification>
>> <target>
>> <artifacts-zip>test-jsr181-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
>> <component-name>servicemix-jsr181</component-name>
>> </target>
>> </service-unit>
>>
>> <service-unit>
>> <identification>
>> <name>test-http</name>
>> <description>Contains the service</description>
>> </identification>
>> <target>
>> <artifacts-zip>test-http-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
>> <component-name>servicemix-http</component-name>
>> </target>
>> </service-unit>
>>
>> </service-assembly>
>> </jbi>
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> boris
>>
>>
>> Philip Dodds-2 wrote:
>> >
>> > Can you provide a copy of the service assembly jbi.xml that is failing?
>> >
>> > P
>> >
>> > On 8/10/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> since I compiled the last version of SM-core from SVN, I'm not able to
>> >> deploy my Service Asembly any more. The problem:
>> >>
>> >> "The JBI descriptor is not valid, please correct these violations [The
>> >> jbi
>> >> descriptor does not contain any informations]"
>> >>
>> >> With the SM-core version that I've used before, everything was running
>> >> fine.
>> >> The method "checkDescriptor" in class "DescriptorFactory" has some new
>> >> features!!! Could you check it?
>> >>
>> >> Many thanks,
>> >>
>> >> boris
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5747645
>> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5757649
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5763560
Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Pure JBI Compliant component
Posted by Soumadeep-Infravio <so...@infravio.com>.
Thanks, let me work on it and will file a JIRA.
Best regards
Soumadeep
----- Original Message -----
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
To: <se...@geronimo.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: Pure JBI Compliant component
> On 8/11/06, Soumadeep-Infravio <so...@infravio.com> wrote:
>>
>> Guillaume/All
>>
>> Can we develop a fully JBI compliant component which has no direct
>> reference
>> to Servicemix libs? So that components can be deployed in any JBI
>> container.
>> Specially, using SMX tools to generate component stubs.
>
>
> ServiceMix components created using servicemix-common use a Shared
> Library.
> (this SL has been recently renamed to servicemix-shared). Shared
> Libraries
> are pre-requisite for installing the JBI component and will be part of
> the
> component class loader. This library currently does not include
> servicemix-core
> where most of the ServiceMix specific classes are, but I had already
> planned
> to
> put it in servicemix-shared. This won't affect the current deployment if
> we
> take
> care of specifiying the right class loader delegation (when deployed in
> ServiceMix,
> the components should use the container classes instead of the ones in
> servicemix-shared). This would allow all ServiceMix standard JBI
> components
> to be
> deployed in any JBI container.
> Please raise a JIRA and provide a patch ;)
>
> And secondly, can this component be deployed in SMX?
>
>
> If you deploy a component which solely relies on the JBI spec, you won't
> have any
> problem in using it. There are already a few components which do this
> (see
> http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/components.html#Components-ExternalstandardJBIcomponents
> )
>
> Thanks
>> Soumadeep
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
Re: Pure JBI Compliant component
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
On 8/11/06, Soumadeep-Infravio <so...@infravio.com> wrote:
>
> Guillaume/All
>
> Can we develop a fully JBI compliant component which has no direct
> reference
> to Servicemix libs? So that components can be deployed in any JBI
> container.
> Specially, using SMX tools to generate component stubs.
ServiceMix components created using servicemix-common use a Shared Library.
(this SL has been recently renamed to servicemix-shared). Shared Libraries
are pre-requisite for installing the JBI component and will be part of the
component class loader. This library currently does not include
servicemix-core
where most of the ServiceMix specific classes are, but I had already planned
to
put it in servicemix-shared. This won't affect the current deployment if we
take
care of specifiying the right class loader delegation (when deployed in
ServiceMix,
the components should use the container classes instead of the ones in
servicemix-shared). This would allow all ServiceMix standard JBI components
to be
deployed in any JBI container.
Please raise a JIRA and provide a patch ;)
And secondly, can this component be deployed in SMX?
If you deploy a component which solely relies on the JBI spec, you won't
have any
problem in using it. There are already a few components which do this
(see
http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/components.html#Components-ExternalstandardJBIcomponents
)
Thanks
> Soumadeep
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Pure JBI Compliant component
Posted by Soumadeep-Infravio <so...@infravio.com>.
Guillaume/All
Can we develop a fully JBI compliant component which has no direct reference
to Servicemix libs? So that components can be deployed in any JBI container.
Specially, using SMX tools to generate component stubs.
And secondly, can this component be deployed in SMX?
Thanks
Soumadeep
Re: Problem with SA deployment
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I think the problem does not come from the SA jbi descriptor, but from one
of the SU jbi descriptor.
ServiceMix does not mandate the existence of the SU jbi.xml, but if present,
the descriptor must
be valid. For example, an empty descriptor (<jbi />) won't pass the tests.
On 8/11/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
>
>
> Sure,
>
> the jbi.xml follows (it's in META-INF):
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <jbi xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jbi" version="1.0">
>
> <service-assembly>
> <identification>
> <name>test</name>
> <description>test</description>
> </identification>
>
> <service-unit>
> <identification>
> <name>jms</name>
> <description>JMS Component</description>
> </identification>
> <target>
> <artifacts-zip>jms-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
> <component-name>servicemix-jms</component-name>
> </target>
> </service-unit>
>
> <service-unit>
> <identification>
> <name>test-jsr181</name>
> <description>Contains the service</description>
> </identification>
> <target>
> <artifacts-zip>test-jsr181-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
> <component-name>servicemix-jsr181</component-name>
> </target>
> </service-unit>
>
> <service-unit>
> <identification>
> <name>test-http</name>
> <description>Contains the service</description>
> </identification>
> <target>
> <artifacts-zip>test-http-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
> <component-name>servicemix-http</component-name>
> </target>
> </service-unit>
>
> </service-assembly>
> </jbi>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> boris
>
>
> Philip Dodds-2 wrote:
> >
> > Can you provide a copy of the service assembly jbi.xml that is failing?
> >
> > P
> >
> > On 8/10/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> since I compiled the last version of SM-core from SVN, I'm not able to
> >> deploy my Service Asembly any more. The problem:
> >>
> >> "The JBI descriptor is not valid, please correct these violations [The
> >> jbi
> >> descriptor does not contain any informations]"
> >>
> >> With the SM-core version that I've used before, everything was running
> >> fine.
> >> The method "checkDescriptor" in class "DescriptorFactory" has some new
> >> features!!! Could you check it?
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >>
> >> boris
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5747645
> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5757649
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Problem with SA deployment
Posted by boris <bs...@eunet.yu>.
Sure,
the jbi.xml follows (it's in META-INF):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jbi xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jbi" version="1.0">
<service-assembly>
<identification>
<name>test</name>
<description>test</description>
</identification>
<service-unit>
<identification>
<name>jms</name>
<description>JMS Component</description>
</identification>
<target>
<artifacts-zip>jms-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
<component-name>servicemix-jms</component-name>
</target>
</service-unit>
<service-unit>
<identification>
<name>test-jsr181</name>
<description>Contains the service</description>
</identification>
<target>
<artifacts-zip>test-jsr181-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
<component-name>servicemix-jsr181</component-name>
</target>
</service-unit>
<service-unit>
<identification>
<name>test-http</name>
<description>Contains the service</description>
</identification>
<target>
<artifacts-zip>test-http-su.zip</artifacts-zip>
<component-name>servicemix-http</component-name>
</target>
</service-unit>
</service-assembly>
</jbi>
Many thanks,
boris
Philip Dodds-2 wrote:
>
> Can you provide a copy of the service assembly jbi.xml that is failing?
>
> P
>
> On 8/10/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> since I compiled the last version of SM-core from SVN, I'm not able to
>> deploy my Service Asembly any more. The problem:
>>
>> "The JBI descriptor is not valid, please correct these violations [The
>> jbi
>> descriptor does not contain any informations]"
>>
>> With the SM-core version that I've used before, everything was running
>> fine.
>> The method "checkDescriptor" in class "DescriptorFactory" has some new
>> features!!! Could you check it?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> boris
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5747645
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5757649
Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Problem with SA deployment
Posted by Philip Dodds <ph...@gmail.com>.
Can you provide a copy of the service assembly jbi.xml that is failing?
P
On 8/10/06, boris <bs...@eunet.yu> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> since I compiled the last version of SM-core from SVN, I'm not able to
> deploy my Service Asembly any more. The problem:
>
> "The JBI descriptor is not valid, please correct these violations [The jbi
> descriptor does not contain any informations]"
>
> With the SM-core version that I've used before, everything was running
> fine.
> The method "checkDescriptor" in class "DescriptorFactory" has some new
> features!!! Could you check it?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> boris
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-SA-deployment-tf2085662.html#a5747645
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>