You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/12/18 12:37:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (JCR-4057) Improve performance of skipping offset
nodes for Lucene queries
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Julian Reschke closed JCR-4057.
-------------------------------
> Improve performance of skipping offset nodes for Lucene queries
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-4057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4057
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 2.10.4
> Reporter: Nils Breunese
> Priority: Major
> Labels: performance
> Attachments: JCR-4057-test.patch, JCR-4057.patch
>
>
> When doing Lucene-based queries with large offset values like 12000 I see pretty bad performance in our system. I have already enabled the {{sizeEstimate}} option to improve performance, but still see queries taking 6 to 66 seconds.
> I have identified the call to {{collectScoreNodes}} for offset nodes in {{org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.QueryResultImpl#getResults}} to be the cause of this. The {{collectScoreNodes}} method builds an anonymous {{ArrayList<ScoreNode[]>}} for the offset nodes, which is not used after building it, so it uses memory for nothing, and it also does access checks for these nodes which are not returned.
> I have attached a patch to Jackrabbit 2.10.4 which just calls {{skip}} on the {{MultiColumnQueryHits result}} and using this patch our query times seem to stay under 2 seconds.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)