[jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6361) Valid statements rejected if Derby has not implicitly created the current user's schema.

["Mike Matrigali (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13905966#comment-13905966 ] 

Mike Matrigali commented on DERBY-6361:
---------------------------------------

Is this issue fixed now in trunk?  does it make sense to put this in 10.10?

> Valid statements rejected if Derby has not implicitly created the current user's schema.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6361
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6361
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: d6361-ignore-missing-schema.diff, derby-6361-01-aa-createDefaultSchema.diff
>
>
> There are many examples of statements failing because Derby has not implicitly created the schema associated with the current user. You don't see this if the schema is the default APP schema. But if the user is anyone other than APP, then various statements can fail. Maybe we should implicitly create a schema even if the user isn't APP. Right now, you get an error like this:
> ERROR 42Y07: Schema 'ROOT' does not exist
> The following script shows an example of this problem:
> connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;create=true;user=esq';
> create table licreq( domain varchar( 10 ) );
> connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;user=root';
> -- fails
> ALTER TABLE esq.licreq ADD COLUMN u_domain GENERATED ALWAYS AS (UPPER(domain));
> connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;user=app';
> -- succeeds
> ALTER TABLE esq.licreq ADD COLUMN u_domain GENERATED ALWAYS AS (UPPER(domain));



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)