Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] OpenTracing in Artemis

[yw yw <wy...@gmail.com>]

Hi!  Did you have checked against the latest code? It's ActiveMQServerPlugin,
something like that:

public interface ActiveMQServerPlugin extends

ActiveMQServerBasePlugin,

ActiveMQServerConnectionPlugin,

ActiveMQServerSessionPlugin,

ActiveMQServerConsumerPlugin,

ActiveMQServerAddressPlugin,

ActiveMQServerQueuePlugin,

ActiveMQServerBindingPlugin,

ActiveMQServerMessagePlugin,

ActiveMQServerBridgePlugin,

ActiveMQServerCriticalPlugin {
}

Jiri Daněk <jd...@redhat.com> 于2019年8月1日周四 上午4:48写道：

> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:23 PM Lohmann Carsten (INST/ECS4) <
> Carsten.Lohmann@bosch-si.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > This kind of distributed tracing seems almost like logging frameworks
> > where
> > > eventually a facade like slf4j was developed to support all the
> different
> > > individual frameworks.
> > >
> > > In any event, I definitely think it's best at this point simply for the
> > > broker to expose hooks (e.g. ActiveMQServerPlugin) rather than
> integrate
> > a
> > > particular solution (as Michael has already suggested).
> >
> > ok, makes sense. I can understand the points made previously about not
> > wanting to integrate it in the broker at this point.
> >
> > > I also think the code should be hosted in a separate repository so it
> can
> > > have its own release cycle, etc.  The broker documentation could
> > certainly
> > > have a chapter on distributed tracing which links to the other repo,
> > though.
> >
> > Good. So, it'll be a solution based on a broker plugin/interceptors. And
> > opentracing-contrib looks like the preferred place to put it.
> >
>
> Where does the Artemis plugin/interceptor live at this moment? I looked for
> it but did not find it. Thanks.
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
> Jiri Daněk
>

Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] OpenTracing in Artemis

[Jiri Daněk <jd...@redhat.com>]

Jiri Daněk <jd...@redhat.com> 于2019年8月1日周四 上午4:48写道：
> Where does the Artemis plugin/interceptor live at this moment? I looked
for
> it but did not find it. Thanks.

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:22 PM yw yw <wy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi!  Did you have checked against the latest code? It's
> ActiveMQServerPlugin,
> something like that:
>
> public interface ActiveMQServerPlugin extends
>

I meant _the_ plugin or interceptor, that integrates with OpenTracing. It
was at some point called OpenTracingActiveMQServerPlugin.
-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Jiri Daněk