You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by jhair <js...@yahoo.com> on 2006/09/15 18:35:37 UTC
Deploying SUs
I need to poll a directory for files, transform the files using a stylesheet,
do some business logic, and then save the transformed to a file.
For polling, transforming, and writing to a file, I'd like to use the
FilePoller, XsltComponent, & FileWriter, respectively. For these components,
I'd like the configuration to exist within the servicemix.xml used when
starting ServiceMix (due to the need to specify local directories, etc).
For my business component, is it best to create a full jbi-component? If so,
how would I configure servicemix.xml for SM startup?
Should I create some classes and deploy using a SU? If so, it doesn't appear
as though I can configure the boot servicemix.xml using components
configured within an SU.
Or should my business component/jar file need to be a share file?
Thanx,
jsh
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6328844
Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Deploying SUs
Posted by jhair <js...@yahoo.com>.
I have to parse an XML file in my business component. Will ServiceMix not be
happy if I use/include dom4j on the container classpath? Or should I use W3C
DOM as it's already included in the libs dir?
Thanx,
jsh
gnodet wrote:
>
> If you configure components in the main xml configuration, all
> the components and SU code need to be available in the container
> classloader classpath. You can not have a separate classloader.
> You can not deploy SU and configure it in the main servicemix.xml
> configuration.
> The only way is to put all needed components and SU code in the
> container classpath but it mean it will also be available in all
> inherited classloaders (for all JBI artifacts).
>
> On 9/18/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> How do you deploy the artifacts to make them available for static
>> configuration? Am I able to place the SU in the deploy directory and have
>> the configuration within the static servicemix.xml? I started down this
>> path
>> and had problems. But that may have been something that I was missing. If
>> not, where/how do I deploy my business classes that they will be picked
>> up
>> in the classpath. I'm not crazy about mixing my classes/jar files with
>> ServiceMix's jar files. I'd like to keep the 2 separate to ensure no
>> class
>> loading issues occur.
>>
>> Thanx,
>> jsh
>>
>>
>> gnodet wrote:
>> >
>> > On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I was wondering if mixing the static configuration and runtime
>> deployment
>> >> was
>> >> even possible. That's what I was struggling with.
>> >>
>> >> If I go the route of writing a lightweight component, can I deploy it
>> >> outside of an SU and then configure the boot servicemix.xml? Or do I
>> >> still
>> >> need to deploy it as an SU and contain everything within the SU
>> >> servicemix.xml configuration?
>> >
>> > Lightweight components can be used from a static servicemix
>> > configuration file or from a SU on the lightweight container.
>> > You should be able to mix both configurations if needed.
>> > What kind of problems do you have ?
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Thanx,
>> >> jsh
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> gnodet wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm not sure mixing static configuration and runtime
>> >> > deployment is a good idea, even if it will work.
>> >> >
>> >> > I would recommend using only a static configuration
>> >> > or using only SUs and deploy them.
>> >> > It does not really affect which component you can use
>> >> > or write.
>> >> >
>> >> > For you business component, if you do not plan to create
>> >> > a container and support SUs, i would recommend to
>> >> > write a lightweight component instead of a full blown
>> >> > component.
>> >> >
>> >> > Take a look at the examples in recent snapshot distribution
>> >> > (or the non official yet 3.0), you will see different deployment
>> >> > style. If you plan to use SU, i would recommend the maven
>> >> > tooling to ease that and to create the basis for your component
>> >> > (if you write one).
>> >> >
>> >> > On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I need to poll a directory for files, transform the files using a
>> >> >> stylesheet,
>> >> >> do some business logic, and then save the transformed to a file.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For polling, transforming, and writing to a file, I'd like to use
>> the
>> >> >> FilePoller, XsltComponent, & FileWriter, respectively. For these
>> >> >> components,
>> >> >> I'd like the configuration to exist within the servicemix.xml used
>> >> when
>> >> >> starting ServiceMix (due to the need to specify local directories,
>> >> etc).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For my business component, is it best to create a full
>> jbi-component?
>> >> If
>> >> >> so,
>> >> >> how would I configure servicemix.xml for SM startup?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Should I create some classes and deploy using a SU? If so, it
>> doesn't
>> >> >> appear
>> >> >> as though I can configure the boot servicemix.xml using components
>> >> >> configured within an SU.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Or should my business component/jar file need to be a share file?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanx,
>> >> >> jsh
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6328844
>> >> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> > Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6329820
>> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6356039
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6380778
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Deploying SUs
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
If you configure components in the main xml configuration, all
the components and SU code need to be available in the container
classloader classpath. You can not have a separate classloader.
You can not deploy SU and configure it in the main servicemix.xml
configuration.
The only way is to put all needed components and SU code in the
container classpath but it mean it will also be available in all
inherited classloaders (for all JBI artifacts).
On 9/18/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> How do you deploy the artifacts to make them available for static
> configuration? Am I able to place the SU in the deploy directory and have
> the configuration within the static servicemix.xml? I started down this path
> and had problems. But that may have been something that I was missing. If
> not, where/how do I deploy my business classes that they will be picked up
> in the classpath. I'm not crazy about mixing my classes/jar files with
> ServiceMix's jar files. I'd like to keep the 2 separate to ensure no class
> loading issues occur.
>
> Thanx,
> jsh
>
>
> gnodet wrote:
> >
> > On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I was wondering if mixing the static configuration and runtime deployment
> >> was
> >> even possible. That's what I was struggling with.
> >>
> >> If I go the route of writing a lightweight component, can I deploy it
> >> outside of an SU and then configure the boot servicemix.xml? Or do I
> >> still
> >> need to deploy it as an SU and contain everything within the SU
> >> servicemix.xml configuration?
> >
> > Lightweight components can be used from a static servicemix
> > configuration file or from a SU on the lightweight container.
> > You should be able to mix both configurations if needed.
> > What kind of problems do you have ?
> >
> >>
> >> Thanx,
> >> jsh
> >>
> >>
> >> gnodet wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure mixing static configuration and runtime
> >> > deployment is a good idea, even if it will work.
> >> >
> >> > I would recommend using only a static configuration
> >> > or using only SUs and deploy them.
> >> > It does not really affect which component you can use
> >> > or write.
> >> >
> >> > For you business component, if you do not plan to create
> >> > a container and support SUs, i would recommend to
> >> > write a lightweight component instead of a full blown
> >> > component.
> >> >
> >> > Take a look at the examples in recent snapshot distribution
> >> > (or the non official yet 3.0), you will see different deployment
> >> > style. If you plan to use SU, i would recommend the maven
> >> > tooling to ease that and to create the basis for your component
> >> > (if you write one).
> >> >
> >> > On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I need to poll a directory for files, transform the files using a
> >> >> stylesheet,
> >> >> do some business logic, and then save the transformed to a file.
> >> >>
> >> >> For polling, transforming, and writing to a file, I'd like to use the
> >> >> FilePoller, XsltComponent, & FileWriter, respectively. For these
> >> >> components,
> >> >> I'd like the configuration to exist within the servicemix.xml used
> >> when
> >> >> starting ServiceMix (due to the need to specify local directories,
> >> etc).
> >> >>
> >> >> For my business component, is it best to create a full jbi-component?
> >> If
> >> >> so,
> >> >> how would I configure servicemix.xml for SM startup?
> >> >>
> >> >> Should I create some classes and deploy using a SU? If so, it doesn't
> >> >> appear
> >> >> as though I can configure the boot servicemix.xml using components
> >> >> configured within an SU.
> >> >>
> >> >> Or should my business component/jar file need to be a share file?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanx,
> >> >> jsh
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6328844
> >> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Guillaume Nodet
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6329820
> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6356039
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Deploying SUs
Posted by jhair <js...@yahoo.com>.
How do you deploy the artifacts to make them available for static
configuration? Am I able to place the SU in the deploy directory and have
the configuration within the static servicemix.xml? I started down this path
and had problems. But that may have been something that I was missing. If
not, where/how do I deploy my business classes that they will be picked up
in the classpath. I'm not crazy about mixing my classes/jar files with
ServiceMix's jar files. I'd like to keep the 2 separate to ensure no class
loading issues occur.
Thanx,
jsh
gnodet wrote:
>
> On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering if mixing the static configuration and runtime deployment
>> was
>> even possible. That's what I was struggling with.
>>
>> If I go the route of writing a lightweight component, can I deploy it
>> outside of an SU and then configure the boot servicemix.xml? Or do I
>> still
>> need to deploy it as an SU and contain everything within the SU
>> servicemix.xml configuration?
>
> Lightweight components can be used from a static servicemix
> configuration file or from a SU on the lightweight container.
> You should be able to mix both configurations if needed.
> What kind of problems do you have ?
>
>>
>> Thanx,
>> jsh
>>
>>
>> gnodet wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm not sure mixing static configuration and runtime
>> > deployment is a good idea, even if it will work.
>> >
>> > I would recommend using only a static configuration
>> > or using only SUs and deploy them.
>> > It does not really affect which component you can use
>> > or write.
>> >
>> > For you business component, if you do not plan to create
>> > a container and support SUs, i would recommend to
>> > write a lightweight component instead of a full blown
>> > component.
>> >
>> > Take a look at the examples in recent snapshot distribution
>> > (or the non official yet 3.0), you will see different deployment
>> > style. If you plan to use SU, i would recommend the maven
>> > tooling to ease that and to create the basis for your component
>> > (if you write one).
>> >
>> > On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I need to poll a directory for files, transform the files using a
>> >> stylesheet,
>> >> do some business logic, and then save the transformed to a file.
>> >>
>> >> For polling, transforming, and writing to a file, I'd like to use the
>> >> FilePoller, XsltComponent, & FileWriter, respectively. For these
>> >> components,
>> >> I'd like the configuration to exist within the servicemix.xml used
>> when
>> >> starting ServiceMix (due to the need to specify local directories,
>> etc).
>> >>
>> >> For my business component, is it best to create a full jbi-component?
>> If
>> >> so,
>> >> how would I configure servicemix.xml for SM startup?
>> >>
>> >> Should I create some classes and deploy using a SU? If so, it doesn't
>> >> appear
>> >> as though I can configure the boot servicemix.xml using components
>> >> configured within an SU.
>> >>
>> >> Or should my business component/jar file need to be a share file?
>> >>
>> >> Thanx,
>> >> jsh
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6328844
>> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6329820
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6356039
Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Deploying SUs
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I was wondering if mixing the static configuration and runtime deployment was
> even possible. That's what I was struggling with.
>
> If I go the route of writing a lightweight component, can I deploy it
> outside of an SU and then configure the boot servicemix.xml? Or do I still
> need to deploy it as an SU and contain everything within the SU
> servicemix.xml configuration?
Lightweight components can be used from a static servicemix
configuration file or from a SU on the lightweight container.
You should be able to mix both configurations if needed.
What kind of problems do you have ?
>
> Thanx,
> jsh
>
>
> gnodet wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure mixing static configuration and runtime
> > deployment is a good idea, even if it will work.
> >
> > I would recommend using only a static configuration
> > or using only SUs and deploy them.
> > It does not really affect which component you can use
> > or write.
> >
> > For you business component, if you do not plan to create
> > a container and support SUs, i would recommend to
> > write a lightweight component instead of a full blown
> > component.
> >
> > Take a look at the examples in recent snapshot distribution
> > (or the non official yet 3.0), you will see different deployment
> > style. If you plan to use SU, i would recommend the maven
> > tooling to ease that and to create the basis for your component
> > (if you write one).
> >
> > On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I need to poll a directory for files, transform the files using a
> >> stylesheet,
> >> do some business logic, and then save the transformed to a file.
> >>
> >> For polling, transforming, and writing to a file, I'd like to use the
> >> FilePoller, XsltComponent, & FileWriter, respectively. For these
> >> components,
> >> I'd like the configuration to exist within the servicemix.xml used when
> >> starting ServiceMix (due to the need to specify local directories, etc).
> >>
> >> For my business component, is it best to create a full jbi-component? If
> >> so,
> >> how would I configure servicemix.xml for SM startup?
> >>
> >> Should I create some classes and deploy using a SU? If so, it doesn't
> >> appear
> >> as though I can configure the boot servicemix.xml using components
> >> configured within an SU.
> >>
> >> Or should my business component/jar file need to be a share file?
> >>
> >> Thanx,
> >> jsh
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6328844
> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6329820
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Deploying SUs
Posted by jhair <js...@yahoo.com>.
I was wondering if mixing the static configuration and runtime deployment was
even possible. That's what I was struggling with.
If I go the route of writing a lightweight component, can I deploy it
outside of an SU and then configure the boot servicemix.xml? Or do I still
need to deploy it as an SU and contain everything within the SU
servicemix.xml configuration?
Thanx,
jsh
gnodet wrote:
>
> I'm not sure mixing static configuration and runtime
> deployment is a good idea, even if it will work.
>
> I would recommend using only a static configuration
> or using only SUs and deploy them.
> It does not really affect which component you can use
> or write.
>
> For you business component, if you do not plan to create
> a container and support SUs, i would recommend to
> write a lightweight component instead of a full blown
> component.
>
> Take a look at the examples in recent snapshot distribution
> (or the non official yet 3.0), you will see different deployment
> style. If you plan to use SU, i would recommend the maven
> tooling to ease that and to create the basis for your component
> (if you write one).
>
> On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> I need to poll a directory for files, transform the files using a
>> stylesheet,
>> do some business logic, and then save the transformed to a file.
>>
>> For polling, transforming, and writing to a file, I'd like to use the
>> FilePoller, XsltComponent, & FileWriter, respectively. For these
>> components,
>> I'd like the configuration to exist within the servicemix.xml used when
>> starting ServiceMix (due to the need to specify local directories, etc).
>>
>> For my business component, is it best to create a full jbi-component? If
>> so,
>> how would I configure servicemix.xml for SM startup?
>>
>> Should I create some classes and deploy using a SU? If so, it doesn't
>> appear
>> as though I can configure the boot servicemix.xml using components
>> configured within an SU.
>>
>> Or should my business component/jar file need to be a share file?
>>
>> Thanx,
>> jsh
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6328844
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6329820
Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Deploying SUs
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I'm not sure mixing static configuration and runtime
deployment is a good idea, even if it will work.
I would recommend using only a static configuration
or using only SUs and deploy them.
It does not really affect which component you can use
or write.
For you business component, if you do not plan to create
a container and support SUs, i would recommend to
write a lightweight component instead of a full blown
component.
Take a look at the examples in recent snapshot distribution
(or the non official yet 3.0), you will see different deployment
style. If you plan to use SU, i would recommend the maven
tooling to ease that and to create the basis for your component
(if you write one).
On 9/15/06, jhair <js...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I need to poll a directory for files, transform the files using a stylesheet,
> do some business logic, and then save the transformed to a file.
>
> For polling, transforming, and writing to a file, I'd like to use the
> FilePoller, XsltComponent, & FileWriter, respectively. For these components,
> I'd like the configuration to exist within the servicemix.xml used when
> starting ServiceMix (due to the need to specify local directories, etc).
>
> For my business component, is it best to create a full jbi-component? If so,
> how would I configure servicemix.xml for SM startup?
>
> Should I create some classes and deploy using a SU? If so, it doesn't appear
> as though I can configure the boot servicemix.xml using components
> configured within an SU.
>
> Or should my business component/jar file need to be a share file?
>
> Thanx,
> jsh
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-SUs-tf2278624.html#a6328844
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet