Bug or backcompat example: Solr example/multicore/solr.xml in legacy format?

[Jack Krupansky <ja...@basetechnology.com>]

I just happened to notice that the solr.xml file in the Solr example/multicore in branch_4x (and 4.4 as well) is still in the old legacy format (with <cores>/<core>). Is that merely an oversight or intentional for demonstrating backwards compatibility?

-- Jack Krupansky

Re: Bug or backcompat example: Solr example/multicore/solr.xml in legacy format?

[Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>]

+1 for nuking multi core example. And "schema less" should become the new default too, nuking yet another set of parallel configs!

--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com

28. aug. 2013 kl. 16:47 skrev Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>:

> I have an old JIRA where I started working on this, but I cannot find it.
> 
> There has been no need for the multi core example for years now. I did a bunch of work taking it out at one point, but I'm sure that work is old enough to be useless now. Never go around to committing it.
> 
> A few tests tie into those configs and I think there was some other flotsam and jettsom to clean up.
> 
> - Mark
> 
> On Aug 27, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> bq:  I think we should just get rid of it entirely
>> 
>> +1, especially since we're going to core discovery, the collections API, etc.
>> 
>> FWIW,
>> Erick
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>> On 8/27/2013 11:24 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
>> I just happened to notice that the solr.xml file in the Solr
>> example/multicore in branch_4x (and 4.4 as well) is still in the old
>> legacy format (with <cores>/<core>). Is that merely an oversight or
>> intentional for demonstrating backwards compatibility?
>> 
>> The example/multicore directory seems to generally very out of date. The schema uses an ancient version, and doesn't have any good examples of how to use analyzers effectively.  I'm fairly sure that all the examples use solr.xml and are therefore inherently multicore.
>> 
>> Unless we plan to thoroughly update the multicore example so it's as modern as the main example, I think we should just get rid of it entirely.
>> 
>> If we need an example that uses legacy config methods, I think we should make a new subdirectory.  It should come with an extensive README and the solrconfig/schema should be more heavily commented than the standard example.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 

Re: Bug or backcompat example: Solr example/multicore/solr.xml in legacy format?

[Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>]

I have an old JIRA where I started working on this, but I cannot find it.

There has been no need for the multi core example for years now. I did a bunch of work taking it out at one point, but I'm sure that work is old enough to be useless now. Never go around to committing it.

A few tests tie into those configs and I think there was some other flotsam and jettsom to clean up.

- Mark

On Aug 27, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com> wrote:

> bq:  I think we should just get rid of it entirely
> 
> +1, especially since we're going to core discovery, the collections API, etc.
> 
> FWIW,
> Erick
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 8/27/2013 11:24 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> I just happened to notice that the solr.xml file in the Solr
> example/multicore in branch_4x (and 4.4 as well) is still in the old
> legacy format (with <cores>/<core>). Is that merely an oversight or
> intentional for demonstrating backwards compatibility?
> 
> The example/multicore directory seems to generally very out of date. The schema uses an ancient version, and doesn't have any good examples of how to use analyzers effectively.  I'm fairly sure that all the examples use solr.xml and are therefore inherently multicore.
> 
> Unless we plan to thoroughly update the multicore example so it's as modern as the main example, I think we should just get rid of it entirely.
> 
> If we need an example that uses legacy config methods, I think we should make a new subdirectory.  It should come with an extensive README and the solrconfig/schema should be more heavily commented than the standard example.
> 
> Thanks,
> Shawn
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 

Re: Bug or backcompat example: Solr example/multicore/solr.xml in legacy format?

[Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>]

bq:  I think we should just get rid of it entirely

+1, especially since we're going to core discovery, the collections API,
etc.

FWIW,
Erick


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 8/27/2013 11:24 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
>
>> I just happened to notice that the solr.xml file in the Solr
>> example/multicore in branch_4x (and 4.4 as well) is still in the old
>> legacy format (with <cores>/<core>). Is that merely an oversight or
>> intentional for demonstrating backwards compatibility?
>>
>
> The example/multicore directory seems to generally very out of date. The
> schema uses an ancient version, and doesn't have any good examples of how
> to use analyzers effectively.  I'm fairly sure that all the examples use
> solr.xml and are therefore inherently multicore.
>
> Unless we plan to thoroughly update the multicore example so it's as
> modern as the main example, I think we should just get rid of it entirely.
>
> If we need an example that uses legacy config methods, I think we should
> make a new subdirectory.  It should come with an extensive README and the
> solrconfig/schema should be more heavily commented than the standard
> example.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.**org<de...@lucene.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Bug or backcompat example: Solr example/multicore/solr.xml in legacy format?

[Shawn Heisey <so...@elyograg.org>]

On 8/27/2013 11:24 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> I just happened to notice that the solr.xml file in the Solr
> example/multicore in branch_4x (and 4.4 as well) is still in the old
> legacy format (with <cores>/<core>). Is that merely an oversight or
> intentional for demonstrating backwards compatibility?

The example/multicore directory seems to generally very out of date. 
The schema uses an ancient version, and doesn't have any good examples 
of how to use analyzers effectively.  I'm fairly sure that all the 
examples use solr.xml and are therefore inherently multicore.

Unless we plan to thoroughly update the multicore example so it's as 
modern as the main example, I think we should just get rid of it entirely.

If we need an example that uses legacy config methods, I think we should 
make a new subdirectory.  It should come with an extensive README and 
the solrconfig/schema should be more heavily commented than the standard 
example.

Thanks,
Shawn


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org