You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Joe Zitnik <JZ...@hfcc.net> on 2007/06/29 17:28:51 UTC
Rulesemporium
Is it having troubles again? I'm having problems reaching the site.
Re: Rulesemporium
Posted by Yet Another Ninja <sa...@alexb.ch>.
On 6/29/2007 5:38 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
>
>> Same here :(
>
> He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
> wouldn't get a DoS attack?
>
> That's what happens when you do good work. :(
>
>
nah... he DOS'd himself
will be back in a few
Re: Rulesemporium
Posted by Yet Another Ninja <sa...@alexb.ch>.
On 6/29/2007 5:53 PM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:38:48 -0700, Jerry Durand
> <jd...@interstellar.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
>>
>>> Same here :(
>> He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
>> wouldn't get a DoS attack?
>>
>> That's what happens when you do good work. :(
>>
>
>
> True - but there's more of us than there are of them. OK, we play
> catch-up, but the user base is worldwide and there are some very, very
> sharp people doing the hard work. I guess the best we can do is
> support them however we can... unless we want to be inundated with
> spam.
Re: Rulesemporium
Posted by Yet Another Ninja <sa...@alexb.ch>.
On 6/29/2007 5:53 PM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:38:48 -0700, Jerry Durand
> <jd...@interstellar.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
>>
>>> Same here :(
>> He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
>> wouldn't get a DoS attack?
>>
>> That's what happens when you do good work. :(
>>
>
>
> True - but there's more of us than there are of them. OK, we play
> catch-up, but the user base is worldwide and there are some very, very
> sharp people doing the hard work. I guess the best we can do is
> support them however we can... unless we want to be inundated with
> spam.
Y'all press those Paypal buttons - every cent goes to hardware.
Re: Rulesemporium
Posted by Nigel Frankcom <ni...@blue-canoe.net>.
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:38:48 -0700, Jerry Durand
<jd...@interstellar.com> wrote:
>
>On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
>
>> Same here :(
>
>He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
>wouldn't get a DoS attack?
>
>That's what happens when you do good work. :(
>
True - but there's more of us than there are of them. OK, we play
catch-up, but the user base is worldwide and there are some very, very
sharp people doing the hard work. I guess the best we can do is
support them however we can... unless we want to be inundated with
spam. Ha! - my stats for year to date run at 82 ish% spam. Since
that's spam stopped I reckon SA isn't doing too badly at all -
admittedly not as much gets through to SA - a lot is stopped by
various 'toys' my MTA has but SA still accounts for a hell of a lot.
Even so - life without SA....?
McDonalds applications anyone? :-D
Kind regards
Nigel
Re: Rulesemporium
Posted by Jerry Durand <jd...@interstellar.com>.
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
> Same here :(
He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
wouldn't get a DoS attack?
That's what happens when you do good work. :(
Re: Rulesemporium
Posted by Lindsay Haisley <fm...@fmp.com>.
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 16:36 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> Is it worth adding mirrors for the rules? I'm more than happy to do so
> and can probably rope in a few others.
>
> I should imagine a fair few others on list would be prepared to act as
> mirrors too.
It's worth mentioning that, as someone pointed out to me yesterday,
there's a mirroring service for SARE rules at
http://saupdates.openprotect.com, along with instructions on
incorporating these into sa-update, thus avoiding problems with
rules_du_jour altogether.
--
Lindsay Haisley |"Fighting against human | PGP public key
FMP Computer Services | creativity is like | available at
512-259-1190 | trying to eradicate |<http://pubkeys.fmp.com>
http://www.fmp.com | dandelions" |
| (Pamela Jones) |
Re: Rulesemporium
Posted by Nigel Frankcom <ni...@blue-canoe.net>.
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:30:25 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- <ux...@splatnix.net>
wrote:
>Same here :(
>
>On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:28:51 -0400, "Joe Zitnik" <JZ...@hfcc.net> wrote:
>> Is it having troubles again? I'm having problems reaching the site.
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>--
>--[ UxBoD ]--
>// PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
>// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
>// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
>// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod@sip.splatnix.net
Is it worth adding mirrors for the rules? I'm more than happy to do so
and can probably rope in a few others.
I should imagine a fair few others on list would be prepared to act as
mirrors too.
Just a thought.
Kind regards
Nigel
Re: Rulesemporium
Posted by --,
,
UxBoD,
,
-- <ux...@splatnix.net>.
Same here :(
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:28:51 -0400, "Joe Zitnik" <JZ...@hfcc.net> wrote:
> Is it having troubles again? I'm having problems reaching the site.
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod@sip.splatnix.net
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.