You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/23 09:19:55 UTC
Deleting branches
We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to delete them.
Anyone have any problems with this?
D.
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <ak...@gmail.com>.
Thanks! :-)
On 23. nov. 2009, at 11.11, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> "webui" branch is back
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> <ak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks!
>> Just needed the old codebase so that I can take a look at what Mrinal
>> already did.
>> (the web-ui branch is most important, I can create a new branch for
>> the new
>> UI)
>>
>> /Anne
>>
>>
>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 11.02, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>
>>> I'll ressurrect them for you.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> <ak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I wish you'd asked before you deleted.
>>>> I needed/need the UI branches :(
>>>>
>>>> /Anne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 10.57, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 2 for UI work, one for actions and one for pools.
>>>>>
>>>>> D.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>>> <yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which branches are those four?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Anne Kathrine
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 09.19, Richard Hirsch
>>>>>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to
>>>>>>> delete
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
"webui" branch is back
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<ak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
> Just needed the old codebase so that I can take a look at what Mrinal
> already did.
> (the web-ui branch is most important, I can create a new branch for the new
> UI)
>
> /Anne
>
>
> On 23. nov. 2009, at 11.02, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>
>> I'll ressurrect them for you.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> <ak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wish you'd asked before you deleted.
>>> I needed/need the UI branches :(
>>>
>>> /Anne
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 10.57, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2 for UI work, one for actions and one for pools.
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>>> <yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Which branches are those four?
>>>>>
>>>>> /Anne Kathrine
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 09.19, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to delete
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> D.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <ak...@gmail.com>.
Thanks!
Just needed the old codebase so that I can take a look at what Mrinal
already did.
(the web-ui branch is most important, I can create a new branch for
the new UI)
/Anne
On 23. nov. 2009, at 11.02, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> I'll ressurrect them for you.
>
> D.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> <ak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I wish you'd asked before you deleted.
>> I needed/need the UI branches :(
>>
>> /Anne
>>
>>
>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 10.57, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>
>>> 2 for UI work, one for actions and one for pools.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>>> <yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Which branches are those four?
>>>>
>>>> /Anne Kathrine
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 09.19, Richard Hirsch
>>>> <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to
>>>>> delete
>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>>>>
>>>>> D.
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
I'll ressurrect them for you.
D.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<ak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wish you'd asked before you deleted.
> I needed/need the UI branches :(
>
> /Anne
>
>
> On 23. nov. 2009, at 10.57, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>
>> 2 for UI work, one for actions and one for pools.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> <yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Which branches are those four?
>>>
>>> /Anne Kathrine
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 09.19, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to delete
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>
>
>
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <ak...@gmail.com>.
I wish you'd asked before you deleted.
I needed/need the UI branches :(
/Anne
On 23. nov. 2009, at 10.57, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> 2 for UI work, one for actions and one for pools.
>
> D.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> <yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Which branches are those four?
>>
>> /Anne Kathrine
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 23. nov. 2009, at 09.19, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to
>>> delete them.
>>>
>>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>>
>>> D.
>>
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
2 for UI work, one for actions and one for pools.
D.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<yo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Which branches are those four?
>
> /Anne Kathrine
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 23. nov. 2009, at 09.19, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to delete them.
>>
>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>
>> D.
>
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
Which branches are those four?
/Anne Kathrine
Sent from my iPhone
On 23. nov. 2009, at 09.19, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to delete
> them.
>
> Anyone have any problems with this?
>
> D.
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
I've deleted all branches, because they were based on such an old code
base that they were no longer relevant.
D.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Since the branches were created for experimenting with new features
> (at least mine: access-pools and hooks-actions) and not tied to a
> version, you can safely delete them.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to delete them.
>>
>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>
>> D.
>>
>
Re: Deleting branches
Posted by Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>.
Since the branches were created for experimenting with new features
(at least mine: access-pools and hooks-actions) and not tied to a
version, you can safely delete them.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We currently have 4 branches that aren't be used. I'd like to delete them.
>
> Anyone have any problems with this?
>
> D.
>