You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org> on 2024/03/29 16:05:46 UTC

[DISCUSS] Skip shaded packages in compatibility report?

In reviewing the compatibility report for 2.6.0, I missed a real issue. I
think part of the problem for me was the amount of noise in the report
related to changes in shaded zookeeper packages.

According to the usage report of japi-compliance-checker, we could provide
a "-skip-packages" argument which points at a file with package names to
exclude. I wonder if we should exclude org.apache.hadoop.hbase.shaded
and org.apache.hbase.thirdparty.

Thoughts? I can file a JIRA and get it done if there's consensus.

Re: [DISCUSS] Skip shaded packages in compatibility report?

Posted by "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.

+1

Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org> 于2024年3月30日周六 00:06写道：
>
> In reviewing the compatibility report for 2.6.0, I missed a real issue. I
> think part of the problem for me was the amount of noise in the report
> related to changes in shaded zookeeper packages.
>
> According to the usage report of japi-compliance-checker, we could provide
> a "-skip-packages" argument which points at a file with package names to
> exclude. I wonder if we should exclude org.apache.hadoop.hbase.shaded
> and org.apache.hbase.thirdparty.
>
> Thoughts? I can file a JIRA and get it done if there's consensus.