You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Peter Schuller (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/21 01:58:45 UTC

[jira] Updated: (CASSANDRA-2023) fix regression in 1968 (young gen sizing logic)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Peter Schuller updated CASSANDRA-2023:
--------------------------------------

    Attachment: 2023.txt

> fix regression in 1968 (young gen sizing logic)
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-2023
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2023
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Peter Schuller
>            Assignee: Peter Schuller
>         Attachments: 2023.txt
>
>
> 1968 introduced a regression (there was still cleanup to do). In particular it broke when an explicit MAX_HEAP_SIZE was set. Attaching *draft* patch (needs more testing).
> Allowing automatic newsize calculation in the face of a manually specified MAX_HEAP_SIZE was problematic. Either one has to duplicate JVM parsing of MAX_HEAP_SIZE or ask the user to set MAX_HEAP_SIZE_IN_MB (or similar) instead.
> In this patch (consider it a draft) i opted for the latter + picking up MAX_HEAP_SIZE for backwards compatibility (but with the effect that it disables new size calculation). I tried to make it slightly more posixly correct, but as usual no guarantees given that I have no posix shell to test it on.
> I'm not really happy about the shell acrobatics and my confidence that there is not some left-over issue is not high. Should we just not worry about MAX_HEAP_SIZE compatibility and remove all that compatibility cruft? Plenty of acrobatics left still, but it would remove the more hideous parts.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.