You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@camel.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/09/28 10:23:40 UTC

[GitHub] [camel-quarkus] jamesnetherton commented on pull request #4144: Increase test coverage of ref extension

jamesnetherton commented on PR #4144:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/4144#issuecomment-1260701292

   > This PR introduce a second route in tests: Are the 2 routes testing exactly the same scenario ?
   
   Sort of. One case uses the `from("endpont-bean-id")` / `to(endpont-bean-id")` idiom. The other case explicitly specifies the `ref` scheme like `from("ref:endpont-bean-id")` / `to(ref:endpont-bean-id")`.
   
   > Also, we switch from requestBody+direct to sendBody+direct+seda: Is the purpose to test a kind of subtlety of the ref component?
   
   Not really - we just need to test routing with `from` & `to` so figured it was a simple enough way of doing that.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org