You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by "Adam D. Moss" <ad...@gimp.org> on 2004/11/30 22:03:29 UTC
svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Hi!
Interrupted svn switch operations have utterly 'busticated'
my WC three times in the past week (that is, the period in
which I've been actively using 'svn switch'). Needless to
say (but I'll say it) that's a... serious matter. Extricating
local changes from a busted WC hurts a lot.
I haven't been able to test the r11708 fix yet but would
welcome any change in 1.1.2 which might improve matters.
Thanks,
--Adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
ark-d@betasystems.com writes:
> does this version support locks?
No.
> does anybody recommend this version for production use?
It should be as stable as 1.1.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by ar...@betasystems.com.
does this version support locks?
does anybody recommend this version for production use?
1.1.1is pretty safe on *nix :-)
best ragards
Arash
kfogel@collab.net
Sent by:
kfogel@newton.ch. To
collab.net "Adam D. Moss" <ad...@gimp.org>
cc
users@subversion.tigris.org
02.12.2004 18:08 Subject
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Please respond to
kfogel@collab.net
"Adam D. Moss" <ad...@gimp.org> writes:
> Adam D. Moss wrote:
> > I haven't been able to test the r11708 fix yet
>
> Tested now. No bustication observed!
Thanks, that's good to know.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
"Adam D. Moss" <ad...@gimp.org> writes:
> Adam D. Moss wrote:
> > I haven't been able to test the r11708 fix yet
>
> Tested now. No bustication observed!
Thanks, that's good to know.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by "Adam D. Moss" <ad...@gimp.org>.
Adam D. Moss wrote:
> I haven't been able to test the r11708 fix yet
Tested now. No bustication observed!
Thanks,
--Adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by Max Bowsher <ma...@ukf.net>.
Adam D. Moss wrote:
> Ah, I may have understood the meaning of 'candidate' here.
> The layout of the STATUS doc implies that these revisions are
> the candidates for 1.1.2, but I suspect that what is meant
> is that these are revisions that are in the candidate for 1.1.2
> (whew).
>
> Move along, nothing to see here...
No, your first supposition was correct - the revisions are candidates for
1.1.2
However, don't worry, because candidates are virtually always approved.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by "Adam D. Moss" <ad...@gimp.org>.
Ah, I may have understood the meaning of 'candidate' here.
The layout of the STATUS doc implies that these revisions are
the candidates for 1.1.2, but I suspect that what is meant
is that these are revisions that are in the candidate for 1.1.2
(whew).
Move along, nothing to see here...
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ adam@gimp.org http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
On Dec 1, 2004, at 9:44 AM, Adam D. Moss wrote:
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>> It's already nominated for 1.1.2, take a look:
>> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.1.x/STATUS
>
> Hi Ben.
>
> This says that it's a candidate, but not approved. I was
> hoping in some small way to tip the balance. :)
>
It 'candidate' means: it's been nominated for backport into 1.1.2. It
needs three votes (code reviews) to happen.
That said, whenever we do a 'push' for a new bugfix release, nearly
every nominee gets approved. Developers nag each other to review
patches, until they're all merged. We like to see the STATUS file
completely empty. :-)
In other words, if this patch doesn't get into 1.1.2, it's because
somebody found something wrong with it, not because it was neglected
and didn't get enough votes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by "Adam D. Moss" <ad...@gimp.org>.
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> It's already nominated for 1.1.2, take a look:
>
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.1.x/STATUS
Hi Ben.
This says that it's a candidate, but not approved. I was
hoping in some small way to tip the balance. :)
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ adam@gimp.org http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
On Nov 30, 2004, at 4:03 PM, Adam D. Moss wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Interrupted svn switch operations have utterly 'busticated'
> my WC three times in the past week (that is, the period in
> which I've been actively using 'svn switch'). Needless to
> say (but I'll say it) that's a... serious matter. Extricating
> local changes from a busted WC hurts a lot.
>
> I haven't been able to test the r11708 fix yet but would
> welcome any change in 1.1.2 which might improve matters.
>
It's already nominated for 1.1.2, take a look:
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.1.x/STATUS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
"Adam D. Moss" <ad...@gimp.org> writes:
> Interrupted svn switch operations have utterly 'busticated'
> my WC three times in the past week (that is, the period in
> which I've been actively using 'svn switch'). Needless to
> say (but I'll say it) that's a... serious matter. Extricating
> local changes from a busted WC hurts a lot.
Oooh, yeah, I know it.
> I haven't been able to test the r11708 fix yet but would
> welcome any change in 1.1.2 which might improve matters.
It would be very helpful if you *could* test it, and confirm that it
solves your problem. Is that possible?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org