You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Vladimir Sitnikov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/09/01 08:27:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3782) Bitwise operator Bit_And, Bit_OR
and Bit_XOR support binary and varbinary type
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17188258#comment-17188258 ]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-3782:
--------------------------------------------
[~julianhyde], I agree byteString.size() == 0 looks like a bug (e.g. it would produce wrong results for bitand(empty, non-empty)). It looks like an optimization, however, I'm not sure.
Regarding CalciteResource.properties, it looks we could reduce conflicts on the resources file if we add merge=union to gitattributes.
> Bitwise operator Bit_And, Bit_OR and Bit_XOR support binary and varbinary type
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3782
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3782
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.22.0
> Reporter: hailong wang
> Assignee: hailong wang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
> Time Spent: 4h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> According to the discussion link CALCITE-3732 , We should make bitwise operators work on all integer types, BINARY and VARBINARY. So Bit_And, Bit_OR and Bit_XOR agg operator should also support BINARY and VARBINARY.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)