You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> on 2021/11/03 04:33:15 UTC
[Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing
Docs
Hi Pulsar Community,
I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
The issue for this PIP 109 is here https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and all details about Doc Bot.
Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
Anonymitaet
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by Hang Chen <ch...@apache.org>.
+1
Thanks,
Hang
tison <wa...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午4:33写道：
>
> Aha. Get it.
>
> +1
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午4:29写道：
>
> > Tison,
> > actually we already implemented it :-)
> >
> > I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the
> > work as a PIP
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <wa...@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> >> Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
> >> "We need a bot".
> >>
> >> But we already have a bot running online
> >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
> >> So it confuses me.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> tison.
> >>
> >>
> >> Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道：
> >>
> >>> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
> >>> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
> >>>
> >>> From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
> >>> Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
> >>> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
> >>> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
> >>> Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
> >>> Developing Docs
> >>>
> >>> Isn't
> >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
> >>> already into use?
> >>>
> >>> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> tison.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>>
> >>> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道：
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Penghui
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymitaet_@hotmail.com
> >>> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> >>> Hi Pulsar Community,
> >>>
> >>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
> >>>
> >>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
> >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
> >>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
> >>> all details about Doc Bot.
> >>>
> >>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Anonymitaet
> >>>
> >>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by Hang Chen <ch...@apache.org>.
+1
Thanks,
Hang
tison <wa...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午4:33写道：
>
> Aha. Get it.
>
> +1
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午4:29写道：
>
> > Tison,
> > actually we already implemented it :-)
> >
> > I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the
> > work as a PIP
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <wa...@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> >> Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
> >> "We need a bot".
> >>
> >> But we already have a bot running online
> >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
> >> So it confuses me.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> tison.
> >>
> >>
> >> Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道：
> >>
> >>> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
> >>> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
> >>>
> >>> From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
> >>> Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
> >>> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
> >>> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
> >>> Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
> >>> Developing Docs
> >>>
> >>> Isn't
> >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
> >>> already into use?
> >>>
> >>> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> tison.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>>
> >>> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道：
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Penghui
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymitaet_@hotmail.com
> >>> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> >>> Hi Pulsar Community,
> >>>
> >>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
> >>>
> >>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
> >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
> >>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
> >>> all details about Doc Bot.
> >>>
> >>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Anonymitaet
> >>>
> >>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by tison <wa...@gmail.com>.
Aha. Get it.
+1
Best,
tison.
Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午4:29写道：
> Tison,
> actually we already implemented it :-)
>
> I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the
> work as a PIP
>
>
> +1
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <wa...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
>> "We need a bot".
>>
>> But we already have a bot running online
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
>> So it confuses me.
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>>
>> Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道：
>>
>>> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
>>> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
>>>
>>> From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
>>> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
>>> Developing Docs
>>>
>>> Isn't
>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
>>> already into use?
>>>
>>> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> tison.
>>>
>>>
>>> PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>>
>>> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道：
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Penghui
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymitaet_@hotmail.com
>>> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Hi Pulsar Community,
>>>
>>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>>>
>>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
>>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
>>> all details about Doc Bot.
>>>
>>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Anonymitaet
>>>
>>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by tison <wa...@gmail.com>.
Aha. Get it.
+1
Best,
tison.
Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午4:29写道：
> Tison,
> actually we already implemented it :-)
>
> I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the
> work as a PIP
>
>
> +1
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <wa...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
>> "We need a bot".
>>
>> But we already have a bot running online
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
>> So it confuses me.
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>>
>> Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道：
>>
>>> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
>>> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
>>>
>>> From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
>>> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
>>> Developing Docs
>>>
>>> Isn't
>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
>>> already into use?
>>>
>>> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> tison.
>>>
>>>
>>> PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>>
>>> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道：
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Penghui
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymitaet_@hotmail.com
>>> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Hi Pulsar Community,
>>>
>>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>>>
>>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
>>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
>>> all details about Doc Bot.
>>>
>>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Anonymitaet
>>>
>>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Tison,
actually we already implemented it :-)
I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the
work as a PIP
+1
Enrico
Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <wa...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:
> Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
> "We need a bot".
>
> But we already have a bot running online
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
> So it confuses me.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道：
>
>> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
>> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
>>
>> From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
>> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>> Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
>> Developing Docs
>>
>> Isn't
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
>> already into use?
>>
>> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>>
>> PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>> 于2021年11月4日周四
>> 上午8:05写道：
>> +1
>>
>> Penghui
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymitaet_@hotmail.com
>> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Pulsar Community,
>>
>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>>
>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
>> all details about Doc Bot.
>>
>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>>
>> Anonymitaet
>>
>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Tison,
actually we already implemented it :-)
I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the
work as a PIP
+1
Enrico
Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <wa...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:
> Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
> "We need a bot".
>
> But we already have a bot running online
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
> So it confuses me.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道：
>
>> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
>> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
>>
>> From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
>> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>> Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
>> Developing Docs
>>
>> Isn't
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
>> already into use?
>>
>> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>>
>> PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>> 于2021年11月4日周四
>> 上午8:05写道：
>> +1
>>
>> Penghui
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymitaet_@hotmail.com
>> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Pulsar Community,
>>
>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>>
>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
>> all details about Doc Bot.
>>
>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>>
>> Anonymitaet
>>
>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by tison <wa...@gmail.com>.
Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
"We need a bot".
But we already have a bot running online
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
So it confuses me.
Best,
tison.
Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道：
> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
>
> From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
> Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
> Developing Docs
>
> Isn't
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
> already into use?
>
> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>> 于2021年11月4日周四
> 上午8:05写道：
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymitaet_@hotmail.com
> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>
> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
> all details about Doc Bot.
>
> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>
> Anonymitaet
>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by tison <wa...@gmail.com>.
Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
"We need a bot".
But we already have a bot running online
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
So it confuses me.
Best,
tison.
Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道：
> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
>
> From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
> Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
> Developing Docs
>
> Isn't
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
> already into use?
>
> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>> 于2021年11月4日周四
> 上午8:05写道：
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymitaet_@hotmail.com
> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>
> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
> all details about Doc Bot.
>
> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>
> Anonymitaet
>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing
Docs
Posted by Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)? It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Isn't https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml already into use?
From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
Best,
tison.
PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道：
+1
Penghui
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Pulsar Community,
I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
The issue for this PIP 109 is here https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and all details about Doc Bot.
Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
Anonymitaet
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing
Docs
Posted by Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)? It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
From: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "users@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
Cc: Dev <de...@pulsar.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Isn't https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml already into use?
From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
Best,
tison.
PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道：
+1
Penghui
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Pulsar Community,
I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
The issue for this PIP 109 is here https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and all details about Doc Bot.
Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
Anonymitaet
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by tison <wa...@gmail.com>.
Isn't
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
already into use?
From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
Best,
tison.
PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道：
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pulsar Community,
>>
>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>>
>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
>> all details about Doc Bot.
>>
>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>>
>> Anonymitaet
>>
>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by tison <wa...@gmail.com>.
Isn't
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
already into use?
From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
Best,
tison.
PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道：
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pulsar Community,
>>
>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>>
>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
>> all details about Doc Bot.
>>
>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>>
>> Anonymitaet
>>
>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>.
+1
Penghui
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>
> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
> all details about Doc Bot.
>
> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>
> Anonymitaet
>
Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of Developing Docs
Posted by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>.
+1
Penghui
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <an...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>
> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
> all details about Doc Bot.
>
> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>
> Anonymitaet
>