Re: WSIF and attachments

[Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>]

SOUILLARD CHARLES wrote:

>I don't know !
>It needs some work...
>I just wanted to give you an idea of new functionnality.
>  
>
ideas are good to discuss - and i do agree that attachments handling 
need improvements.

patches will be gladly accepted and applied ...

thanks,

alek

>Aleksander Slominski wrote:
>
>  
>
>>SOUILLARD CHARLES wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I saw in the mailing list archives that if someone has a new idea of
>>>development, he has to tell it.
>>>
>>>So why not support SAAJ ?
>>>I saw that by now, attachment are a little managed but lots of cases do
>>>not work.
>>>Unfortunately...
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>how would you like to incorporate SAAJ? how would it be exposed in WSIF API?
>>
>>alek
>>
>>--
>>The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
>>    
>>
>
>  
>


-- 
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay