You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@river.apache.org by jg...@simulexinc.com on 2011/01/11 09:15:32 UTC
updated refactor patch (Jira 388)
Before the discussion ended, the consensus seemed to be affirmative that Java 5+ would be used at least server-side.
Without getting into the various forks of that discussion, is something like what I posted for 388 valuable? Should I continue on to other packages (focused primarily on outrigger for this round)?
As a reminder, the bulk of the refactor was in correcting (not all, but some) compiler warnings and updating the classes to use Java 5 idioms (generics, for-each, etc.).
The updates to the patch that I made were as follows:
1) Added suppressed warnings in points where the "unused" method was used by Serialization or reflection.
2) Fixed error in initial patch (had nixed readNoData, now it's back; screwed up on context, because it was a Serialization-read, not a space-read).
3) Added WeakHashSet class. The majority of WeakHashMap usage in Outrigger used only the keyset. The WeakHashSet class is a small wrapper of WeakHashMap that clarifies the intent a little (by implementing Set). I isolated this change somewhat (submitting a patch with and without), in case there were any objections.
jamesG
Re: updated refactor patch (Jira 388)
Posted by Peter Firmstone <ji...@zeus.net.au>.
Thanks James,
Yes I think this effort will be valuable, I'm currently putting time I
have into the modular build effort (River-300) and source rename, I'll
add your River-388 patches after.
Cheers,
Peter.
jgrahn@simulexinc.com wrote:
> Before the discussion ended, the consensus seemed to be affirmative that Java 5+ would be used at least server-side.
>
> Without getting into the various forks of that discussion, is something like what I posted for 388 valuable? Should I continue on to other packages (focused primarily on outrigger for this round)?
>
> As a reminder, the bulk of the refactor was in correcting (not all, but some) compiler warnings and updating the classes to use Java 5 idioms (generics, for-each, etc.).
>
> The updates to the patch that I made were as follows:
> 1) Added suppressed warnings in points where the "unused" method was used by Serialization or reflection.
> 2) Fixed error in initial patch (had nixed readNoData, now it's back; screwed up on context, because it was a Serialization-read, not a space-read).
> 3) Added WeakHashSet class. The majority of WeakHashMap usage in Outrigger used only the keyset. The WeakHashSet class is a small wrapper of WeakHashMap that clarifies the intent a little (by implementing Set). I isolated this change somewhat (submitting a patch with and without), in case there were any objections.
>
> jamesG
>
>
>