You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@velocity.apache.org by pl...@netscape.net on 2002/09/03 20:52:29 UTC
Nested Macro Efficiency
Suppose you have:
#macro(a)
Hi.
#end
#macro(b)
#a()
#end
#macro(c)
#b()
#end
After the file is parsed, would calling #c() be any less efficient than
calling #a()?
--Paul
__________________________________________________________________
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Nested Macro Efficiency
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>.
On 9/4/02 6:50 AM, "Marco Papini" <mp...@cinetica.it> wrote:
> I think you should read it PROCESSING cost ...
>
> Marco
>
> Claude Brisson wrote:
>>> Of course. The call through c to call b to call a costs something.
>>
>>
>> Ah ? I thought it was freeware ?
>>
>> CloD
>>
Hilarious bunch.
Yes, processing cost, because each invocation of the VM costs something. We
don't do anything clever like try to collapse or inline VM calls. Never
figured that there was much point...
--
Geir Magnusson Jr.
Research & Development, Adeptra Inc.
geirm@adeptra.com
+1-203-247-1713
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Nested Macro Efficiency
Posted by Marco Papini <mp...@cinetica.it>.
I think you should read it PROCESSING cost ...
Marco
Claude Brisson wrote:
>>Of course. The call through c to call b to call a costs something.
>
>
> Ah ? I thought it was freeware ?
>
> CloD
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Nested Macro Efficiency
Posted by Claude Brisson <cl...@savoirweb.com>.
> Of course. The call through c to call b to call a costs something.
Ah ? I thought it was freeware ?
CloD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>
To: <ve...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: mardi 3 septembre 2002 23:29
Subject: Re: Nested Macro Efficiency
> On 9/3/02 2:52 PM, "plynchnlm@netscape.net" <pl...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> > Suppose you have:
> >
> > #macro(a)
> > Hi.
> > #end
> >
> > #macro(b)
> > #a()
> > #end
> >
> > #macro(c)
> > #b()
> > #end
> >
> > After the file is parsed, would calling #c() be any less efficient than
> > calling #a()?
>
> Of course. The call through c to call b to call a costs something.
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr.
> Research & Development, Adeptra Inc.
> geirm@adeptra.com
> +1-203-247-1713
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Powered by
Posted by Grant Goodale <gr...@inktomi.com>.
Hi there,
Another app to add to your "powered by" list, though I doubt
you'll ever see it in the wild: Inktomi's Traffic Controller is an
enterprise network management application used to monitor large groups
of streaming media and static caching appliances from a single console.
As one of the lead developers on the project, I chose Velocity for its
performance and ease of use. Thanks to a well-disciplined team and the
great user groups for both Tomcat and Velocity, we were able to complete
the application in record time, with far fewer bugs than previous web
applications based on JSP.
Sadly, Inktomi has almost completely exited the content
networking business, so I can't really point you to a web page for the
product. Here's the press release:
http://www.inktomi.com/company/news/press/2001/expands.html
Thanks for a great tool - I'm now evangelizing Velocity to
anyone who'll listen. :)
Regards,
Grant Goodale
grant@inktomi.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Nested Macro Efficiency
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>.
On 9/3/02 2:52 PM, "plynchnlm@netscape.net" <pl...@netscape.net> wrote:
> Suppose you have:
>
> #macro(a)
> Hi.
> #end
>
> #macro(b)
> #a()
> #end
>
> #macro(c)
> #b()
> #end
>
> After the file is parsed, would calling #c() be any less efficient than
> calling #a()?
Of course. The call through c to call b to call a costs something.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr.
Research & Development, Adeptra Inc.
geirm@adeptra.com
+1-203-247-1713
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>